Trial Outcomes & Findings for Experiencing Loss and Planning Ahead Study (NCT NCT03332979)

NCT ID: NCT03332979

Last Updated: 2020-10-19

Results Overview

Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory Short Form (MMCGI-SF) (Marwit and Meuser 2005). 18 items with a score range from 18-90. Higher scores indicate higher levels of grief from carers of people with dementia.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

150 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline

Results posted on

2020-10-19

Participant Flow

11/01/2018-31/01/2019 Carers were recruited via a number of avenues including; 9 NHS hospital trusts across England who acted as Participant Identification Centres, the Join Dementia Research (JDR) website and through Alzheimer's Society avenues such as the Alzheimer's Society research network and the Care and Cure magazine.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Study Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Overall Study
STARTED
150
Overall Study
COMPLETED
150
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Experiencing Loss and Planning Ahead Study

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Age, Continuous
63.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
116 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · White British
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · White Other
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Mixed race- White and Asian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Asian/Asian British - Indian
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Asian/Asian British - Pakistani
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · African
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity · Declined to answer
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
150 participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
Single
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
Married/cohabitating
124 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
Divorced/separated
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Marital status
Widowed
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Relationship to person with dementia
Spouse/partner
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Relationship to person with dementia
Adult child
72 Participants
n=5 Participants
Relationship to person with dementia
Other
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Urban Major Conurbation
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Urban City and Town
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Urban City and Town in a sparse setting
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Rural Town and Fringe
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Rural Village
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Rural Hamlets and Isolated Dwellings
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
Rurality
Missing
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
1
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
2
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
3
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
4
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
5
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
6
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
7
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
8
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
9
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
10
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Deprivation
Missing
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Employment status
Yes
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
Employment status
No
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
Support provided by carer
Emotional support
147 Participants
n=5 Participants
Support provided by carer
ADLs
54 Participants
n=5 Participants
Support provided by carer
IADL
144 Participants
n=5 Participants
Support provided by carer
Supervision
114 Participants
n=5 Participants
Years of education
16.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4 • n=5 Participants
Person with dementia gender
Male
82 Participants
n=5 Participants
Person with dementia gender
Female
68 Participants
n=5 Participants
Person with dementia age
80.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 • n=5 Participants
Does the person with dementia require constant supervision
Yes
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Does the person with dementia require constant supervision
No
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
Does the person with dementia require constant supervision
Other
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Does the person with dementia require constant supervision
Missing
1 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory Short Form (MMCGI-SF) (Marwit and Meuser 2005). 18 items with a score range from 18-90. Higher scores indicate higher levels of grief from carers of people with dementia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Pre-death Grief in Dementia Caregiving
57.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale (Annear, Toye et al. 2015). Possible score range 0-50 with a higher score indicating better knowledge of dementia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Knowledge of How Dementia Progresses
34.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Two categorical questions will be used: 'Have you had discussions with the person with dementia regarding their wishes at the end of life? (yes/no). Do you feel you have a good understanding of their wishes for end of life care? (yes/not sure/no).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Knowledge of the Person With Dementia's End of Life Preferences
Yes
110 Participants
Knowledge of the Person With Dementia's End of Life Preferences
Not sure
29 Participants
Knowledge of the Person With Dementia's End of Life Preferences
No
11 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Binary variable - either have or do not have any form of advance plan (such as Power of Attorney, Advance decisions to refuse treatment, Do Not attempt Resuscitation, Advance Care plan) in place for the person with dementia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Advance Decisions in Place for Person With Dementia
Not sure
8 Participants
Advance Decisions in Place for Person With Dementia
No
79 Participants
Advance Decisions in Place for Person With Dementia
Yes
63 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Health Literacy Questionnaire (Osborne et al. 2013) Subscale 1 'Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers' a Average score of 4 items leading to a range of 1-4 with higher scores indicating areas of strength.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Communication With Healthcare Providers
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Health Literacy Questionnaire (Osborne, Batterham et al. 2013) Sub-scale examines satisfaction with support for health from social network. Score is calculated as an average of the 5 items of the subscale leading to a score range of 1-4 with higher scores indicating that a person's social system provides them with all the support they want or need.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Social Support for Health Subscale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Carer report of their relative/friend's severity of dementia using the Clinical Dementia Rating scale (Morris 1993). This scale leads to scores 5 possible scores; 0=no dementia, 0.5=questionable dementia, 1=mild dementia, 2=moderate dementia and 3=severe dementia.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Dementia Severity
Severe dementia
48 Participants
Dementia Severity
Questionable dementia
4 Participants
Dementia Severity
Mild dementia
34 Participants
Dementia Severity
Moderate dementia
64 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline

Duke University Religion Index (Koenig and Büssing 2010). Using the subscale 'Intrinsic religiosity' which assesses degree of personal religious commitment or motivation which has been more strongly associated with protecting from psychological distress. Possible score range is 0-12 with a higher score indicating a stronger personal religious commitment/motivation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
All Study Participants
n=150 Participants
All Study Participants/Usual care
Intrinsic Religiosity
6.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3

Adverse Events

All Study Participants

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr Kirsten Moore

Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London

Phone: 020 7679 9488

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place