Sparing Diaphragm; ISO Block Versus Low Volume Scalene Block
NCT ID: NCT03331237
Last Updated: 2017-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-09
2018-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of HDP and the analgesic efficacy of the LVS block versus ISO block.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LVS group
interscalene injection
scalene block
scalene block using 5ml of ropivacaine
ISO group
in this group all patients will receive ISO block.
ISO block
ISO block is a combined block of suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus cords using a single puncture
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
scalene block
scalene block using 5ml of ropivacaine
ISO block
ISO block is a combined block of suprascapular nerve and brachial plexus cords using a single puncture
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \>35,
* ASA greater \>III,
* an infection at the injection site
* has a contraindication for laryngeal mask or the medications used in this study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Healthpoint Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmad Muhammad Taha
Consultant of aneathesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Healthpoint Hospital
Abu Dhabi, , United Arab Emirates
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Sabah Zahooruddin
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Taha AM, Yurdi NA, Elahl MI, Abd-Elmaksoud AM. Diaphragm-sparing effect of the infraclavicular subomohyoid block vs low volume interscalene block. A randomized blinded study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 May;63(5):653-658. doi: 10.1111/aas.13322. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id