Ultrasound Guided Versus Landmark Guided Small & Medium Joint Arthrocentesis

NCT ID: NCT03327584

Last Updated: 2020-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Arthrocentesis is the removal of synovial fluid for analysis of pathologic processes. Small \& medium joint arthrocentesis will be defined as the following joints: elbow, wrist, finger, ankle and toe. Ultrasound (US) and landmark (LM) small \& medium joint arthrocentesis are both performed within the clinical setting. Both techniques are considered standard of care. Selection of which technique to use is dependent upon the physician's preference. There is currently limited data comparing the two methods. The investigators hope to determine if one modality is more effective in terms of success rate, number of attempts, and time to complete the procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients presenting to the Emergency Department who are 18 years old or older, who do not belong to a vulnerable group, requiring small or medium joint arthrocentesis will be included in this trial. The investigators will randomize each patient into LM vs US. Data collected will include number of attempts to tap the joint, success rate, and time for procedure to be completed. The arthrocentesis will be performed by PGY-3 residents only. A 21 gauge needle will be used for the arthrocentesis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Effusion Joint

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound Guided Arthrocentesis

The patients in this group will have ultrasound guided arthrocentesis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arthrocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Athrocentesis

Landmark Guided Arthrocentesis

The patients in this group will have landmark guided arthrocentesis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arthrocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Athrocentesis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arthrocentesis

Athrocentesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients who require an arthrocentesis of a small and/or medium joint (defined previously)

Exclusion Criteria

* Coagulopathic patients
* Patients on anticoagulants
* Patients with cellulitis overlying the joint.
* Patients with artificial joints
* Adults Unable to Consent
* Vulnerable Populations
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Temple University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ryan C Gibbons, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gibbons RC, Zanaboni A, Genninger J, Costantino TG. Ultrasound-versus landmark-guided medium-sized joint arthrocentesis: A randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Feb;29(2):159-163. doi: 10.1111/acem.14396. Epub 2021 Oct 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34608713 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24623

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tuberoplasty Versus Balloon Spacer
NCT06735170 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2
LRTI vs Internal Brace for CMC OA
NCT03971188 COMPLETED NA