Assessing the Effectiveness of Midazolam Premedication

NCT ID: NCT03325335

Last Updated: 2017-10-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-07-19

Study Completion Date

2017-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pre-anesthetic dosing of midazolam is commonly used in many hospitals for the induction of anesthesia, but the effect is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of midazolam premedication in four aspects: anxiety reduction, pain relief, sedation and hemodynamic stability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background

* Midazolam premedication is a routine practice in many hospitals, but its efficacy remains controversial. We evaluated the effectiveness of midazolam premedication with respect to anxiety and sedation levels, hemodynamic parameters, and analgesic profiles.

Methods

* Subjects

* This randomized, prospective, open-label study was approved by IRB. After written informed consent, a total of 128 female patients aged between 20 and 65 years, ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective thyroidectomy were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were: central nervous system disorders, major cardiovascular disease, chronic pain disorders, peripheral neuropathy, diabetes mellitus neuropathy, nephropathy, hepatopathy, taking any medication affecting the central nervous system or heart rate, alcohol or drug abuse, pregnancy, and contraindication to midazolam premedication. Enrolled all subjects were randomly allocated to either midazolam premedication group (Group P, n=64) or control group (Group N, n=64). Patients of group P were premedicated with intramuscular glycopyrrolate 0.2mg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg 30 minutes before surgery, while patients assigned to Group N were only received glycopyrrolate.
* Anesthetic management

* In the operating room, we did standard monitoring(ECG, pulse oximetry, noninvasive blood pressure, esophageal stethoscope temperature), train of four (TOF) and entropy and surgical pleth index(SPI). Target controlled infusion of propofol (4.0 μg/ml) and remifentanil (4 ng/ml) were used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Marsh and Minto, respectively. Intravenous rocuronium 1.0 mg/kg was administered for muscle relaxation. After intubation, propofol (3.0μg/ml) and remifentanil (2 ng/ml) were infused until incision time. 30 mg of ketorolac was administered 30 minutes before the end of the operation to control postoperative pain.
* Assessment of response to midazolam

* To evaluate the degree of anxiety, the Beck anxiety inventory was conducted at the preoperative day before surgery and immediately after arrival at the operating room. For analgesic profile assessment, SPI monitoring was performed in the operating room and NRS (numeric rating scale) measured in the recovery room and the general ward until the transition to oral analgesics. Also, additional medications for pain control were reviewed. Noninvasive blood pressure, heart rate, and entropy value were recorded at each measuring points in order to evaluate the hemodynamic stability and sedation level during anesthesia induction. Measuring points were initial time, prior to intubation, intubation, prior to incision and incision time. The time taken to induce anesthesia was also recorded.
* Sample size and statistical analysis

* In this study, sample size was determined based on Cohen's study. According to this analysis, when comparing the mean of two groups with α (significance criterion) = 0.05, β (probability of occurring type II error) = 0.2 and medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.5), 64 subjects were needed per group.
* After a normality test, continuous variables were analyzed with the use of an independent t-test, paired t-test, and repeated-measures ANOVA. Differences between categorical variables were calculated with the use of the chi-square test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Midazolam Premedication Anxiety Preoperative Premedication

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

midazolam premedication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Midazolam premedication group (Group P)

Patients of group P were premedicated with intramuscular midazolam 0.05 mg/kg 30 minutes before surgery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Midazolam premedication

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in Group P received midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, intramuscular injection) 30 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Remifentanil infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Target controlled infusion of remifentanil (4ng/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Minto. After intubation, remifentanil (2 ng/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Propofol infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Target controlled infusion of propofol (4.0 μg/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Marsh. After intubation, propofol (3.0μg/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Control group (Group N)

Patients of group N were not premedicated with midazolam (Do not use placebo). \[Treatment of Glycopyrrolate (0.2 mg, IM) 30 minutes prior to surgery is not intervention because it is a routine practice of this center. (-\> removed from interventions)\]

Group Type OTHER

Remifentanil infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Target controlled infusion of remifentanil (4ng/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Minto. After intubation, remifentanil (2 ng/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Propofol infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Target controlled infusion of propofol (4.0 μg/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Marsh. After intubation, propofol (3.0μg/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Midazolam premedication

Patients in Group P received midazolam (0.05 mg/kg, intramuscular injection) 30 minutes before induction of general anesthesia.

Intervention Type DRUG

Remifentanil infusion

Target controlled infusion of remifentanil (4ng/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Minto. After intubation, remifentanil (2 ng/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

Propofol infusion

Target controlled infusion of propofol (4.0 μg/ml) was used for induction of anesthesia based on the pharmacological models of Marsh. After intubation, propofol (3.0μg/ml) was infused until incision time. (Both groups)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Intramuscular midazolam Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of remifentanil Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I or II
* Scheduled for elective thyroidectomy under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* Central nervous system disorders
* Major cardiovascular disease
* Chronic pain disorders
* Peripheral neuropathy
* Diabetes mellitus neuropathy
* Nephropathy
* Hepatopathy
* Taking any medication affecting the central nervous system or heart rate
* Alcohol or drug abuse
* Pregnancy
* Contraindication to midazolam premedication
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pusan National University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hyeon-Jeong Lee

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hyeon-Jeong Lee, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pusan National University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Pusan national university hospital

Busan, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1607-003-057

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id