Different Concentrations of Potassium Nitrate in In-office Tooth Bleaching Sensitivity

NCT ID: NCT03323372

Last Updated: 2017-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-21

Study Completion Date

2017-05-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical study was to evaluate the absolute risk and intensity of sensitivity to dental bleaching in adults on the application of two different gels based on potassium nitrate and sodium fluoride from a prospective randomized clinical study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For this study, 56 volunteers who had an equal allocation rate between the groups (G1-control and G2-experimental) were selected for this study. Both gels act in the same way, the difference between them is the concentration. In both groups, the different desensitizing gels were applied to the vestibular surface of the anterior superior teeth with the aid of a tray, remaining in position according to the time specified by the manufacturers. In the control group, a gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride was used, while in the experimental group, the gel was based on 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride. After removal of the desensitizing gel, both groups were subjected to bleaching with 40% hydrogen peroxide gel for 40 minutes. Patients recorded an occurrence or not of dental sensitivity (SD) in a sensitivity diary for 48 hours. A Verbal Evaluation Scale (VRS) and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used for pain assessment. The values were organized into two categories: percentage of patients who presented SD at some time of treatment (absolute risk of sensitivity) and SD intensity. To evaluate the color before the first bleaching session, and after 7, 14 and 28 days, two methods were used: objective evaluation using the spectrophotometer and subjective evaluation using two color scales: Vita Classical and Vita Bleachedguide 3D-MASTER. An analysis of the data followed the intent-to-treat protocol and involved all randomly allocated participants. The absolute risk of SD was compared using Fisher's exact test (α = 5%). The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the intensity of SD.

Student's t test was used to compare the color change. The level of significance adopted in all tests was 5%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Sensitivity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The design of this randomized, double blind, intervention study was structured based on the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) standards.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

In group 1 (G1-control), the operator applied a desensitizing gel based on 5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride (Desensibilize KF 2% ®, FGM , Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil) with the aid of a custom silicone tray, which was made from a model obtained from the patient, with a vacuum plasticizer. A small layer of the gel was placed on the surface of the tray that was in contact with the vestibular face of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 10 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride

Intervention Type DRUG

experimental group

In group 2 (G2-intervention group), the operator applied a desensitizing gel containing 3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride (Ultra EZ®, Ultradent Products Inc, South Jordan, UT, Estados Unidos) with the help of a tray in which the material is stored on the vestibular surfaces of the upper anterior teeth of the participants. The tray remained in position in the mouth for 15 minutes, according to the manufacturer's specifications.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3% potassium nitrate and 0.25% sodium fluoride

Intervention Type DRUG

5% potassium nitrate and 2% sodium fluoride

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultra EZ Desensibilize KF 2%

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years and older, of both sexes, who had to present at least six upper anterior teeth free of caries and restorations on the vestibular face, and at least one central or canine incisor showing coloration A2 or darker, evaluated in comparison to a visual value-oriented color scale of the teeth (Vita Classical®, Vita-Zahnfabrik- Germany).

Prior to the interventions, the signing of each participant's free and informed consent form (Appendix I) was obtained after due explanations about the nature of the study and the possible risks of the proposed treatments.

Exclusion Criteria

* The individuals excluded from the study were: users of fixed orthodontic appliances, patients with periodontal disease, pregnant or lactating, with severe intrinsic stains on the teeth (spots on the use of tetracycline, fluorosis and depolluted teeth), consuming any Anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant drugs, using desensitizing dentifrice and participants with previous history of SD or any associated pathology (bruxism, gingival recession, non-carious lesion with dentin exposure).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade Federal do Amazonas

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

larissa alves de lima e souza

master student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leandro M Martins, doctorate

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

amazon federal university

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UFAmazonas

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id