Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
3 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-08-30
2019-10-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis underlying this research is that repeated measurements of tissue oxygen levels can be used to optimize cancer therapy, including combined therapy, and to minimize normal tissue side effects or complications. Because studies have found that tumors vary both in their initial levels of oxygen and exhibit changing patterns during growth and treatment, we propose to monitor oxygen levels in tumors and their responsiveness to hyperoxygenation procedures. Such knowledge about oxygen levels in tumor tissues and their responsiveness to hyper-oxygenation could potentially be used to select subjects for particular types of treatment, or otherwise to adjust routine care for patients known to have hypoxic but unresponsive tumors in order to improve their outcomes.
The overall objectives of this study are to establish the clinical feasibility and efficacy of using in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry-a technique related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-to obtain direct and repeated measurements of clinically useful information about tumor tissue oxygenation in specific groups of subjects with the same types of tumors, and to establish the clinical feasibility and efficacy of using inhalation of enriched oxygen to gain additional clinically useful information about responsiveness of tumors to hyper-oxygenation. Two devices are used: a paramagnetic charcoal suspension (Carlo Erba India ink) and in vivo EPR oximetry to assess oxygen levels. The ink is injected and becomes permanent in the tissue at the site of injection unless removed; thereafter, the in vivo oximetry measurements are noninvasive and can be repeated indefinitely.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is split into four cohorts, with a minimum of 1-5 patients expected to be enrolled annually in each cohort, and a total of approximately 10 subjects expected for each cohort. The cohorts are defined by the type of tumor and by scenarios when our measurements will be made relative to the patient's standard therapies: 1) intraoral tumors with planned resection and adjuvant radiation therapy; 2) cutaneous malignant tumors receiving surgical resection only, receiving radiation therapy only, or receiving both surgical resection and adjuvant radiation therapy; 3) breast tumor receiving radiation therapy following surgery; and 4) other tumors receiving radiation therapy. The diagnosis for patients in all cases assumes that an eligible tumor (or the postsurgical area receiving radiation) occurs within approximately one-half centimeter of the surface, as determined by physical exam or imaging if available. All potentially eligible subjects are approached by their treating physician; those who agree to be contacted and are subsequently consented are assigned to the cohort for which they qualify. There is no randomization and no stratification within the cohorts.
Our interest in in situ tumor oxygenation relates to the clinical need to measure oxygen in tumors prior to therapy, to understand tumor oxygen dynamics over the course of therapy, and to assess the effectiveness of oxygen modulation therapy during treatment. Our interest in the postsurgical radiation field relates to the clinical need to understand whether the temporal dynamics of oxygen within the postsurgical radiation field has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies, and to understand how changes in short and long term oxygenation within the postsurgical radiation field may facilitate diminishment of late side effects from surgery and/or radiotherapy.
Following enrollment in the study, each subject will receive an initial placement of one or more geographically separate injections of India ink into the tissue of interest (i.e., tumor and/or tumor bed and/or adjacent tissue) using the established procedures for the injection of the ink. The subject is expected to agree to periodic measurements of all injection sites (unless the ink injection has been surgically removed); the subject will be told to expect six or more visits for measurements during treatment, but must agree to have at least one measurement per injection site. Each measurement will typically consist of 3 ten minute consecutive periods during which the subject initially breathes room air, then 100% oxygen delivered through a non-rebreather face mask followed by a period breathing room air.
Patients will be evaluated during clinical and oximetry appointments with respect to the presence of any adverse events.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1: Intraoral Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Intraoral squamous cell carcinomas that are resected and receive adjuvant radiation therapy. These patients may receive a Carlo Erba Ink injection before surgical tumor resection, after tumor resection (in the postsurgical radiation field), or in both instances. Patients whose tumor is within 5 mm of the surface will have injections of India ink into the tumor itself and measurements made in the tumor prior to surgery. Patients whose tumor is deeper than 5 mm of the surface could participate only in the measurements of the postsurgical radiation field. EPR Oximetry measurements will be made in the tumor and/or, if applicable, over the course of radiation in the postsurgical radiation field as appropriate.
Carlo Erba Ink Injection
Carlo Erba India ink is used in this study as a paramagnetic oxygen sensor that is injected into tissue, and which, when measured using EPR Oximetry, can provide sensitive, repeated, and direct measurements of tissue oxygen. Each study participant will receive at least one ink injection of 20-50µL of Carlo Erba India Ink. The ink injection will occur within 5mm of the body surface (i.e., skin or mucosa), and may be injected into tumor, postsurgical field of radiation, and/or adjacent normal tissue. Carlo Erba Ink is an aqueous suspension composed of charcoal powder, water for injection, and a suspending agent. Carlo Erba is the name of the manufacturer that supplies the charcoal.
EPR Oximetry Measurement
An oximetry measurement visit consists of \~ 30 minutes of continuous scans of tissue oxygen in vivo, using an oxygen sensor (i.e., India ink) injected into the tumor that is noninvasively scanned using EPR oximetry. Scans, converted into measurements of pO2, characterize the current tumor oxygen level at: (1) 'steady state' (while breathing room air), 2) response to hyperoxygenation therapy (inhaling oxygen-enriched air for 10 min), and 3) response to resuming inhaling room air. EPR measurements are repeated noninvasively throughout radiation or chemotherapy, to examine changes. The minimum number of visits depends on the patient's cohort; all may have additional measurements. If the ink injection is not surgically removed, EPR oximetry measurements can be repeated indefinitely.
2: Cutaneous Malignant Tumors
Patients with primary cutaneous malignant tumors (including but not limited to squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, or melanoma) whose tumor is within 5 mm of the surface and whose treatment plan includes surgical resection and/or postsurgical radiation therapy. These patients may receive a Carlo Erba Ink injection before surgical tumor resection, after tumor resection (in the postsurgical radiation field), in both the tumor and the postsurgical radiation field, or in the tumor prior to radiation therapy. EPR Oximetry measurements will be made in the tumor and/or, if applicable, over the course of radiation in the tumor or postsurgical radiation field as appropriate.
Carlo Erba Ink Injection
Carlo Erba India ink is used in this study as a paramagnetic oxygen sensor that is injected into tissue, and which, when measured using EPR Oximetry, can provide sensitive, repeated, and direct measurements of tissue oxygen. Each study participant will receive at least one ink injection of 20-50µL of Carlo Erba India Ink. The ink injection will occur within 5mm of the body surface (i.e., skin or mucosa), and may be injected into tumor, postsurgical field of radiation, and/or adjacent normal tissue. Carlo Erba Ink is an aqueous suspension composed of charcoal powder, water for injection, and a suspending agent. Carlo Erba is the name of the manufacturer that supplies the charcoal.
EPR Oximetry Measurement
An oximetry measurement visit consists of \~ 30 minutes of continuous scans of tissue oxygen in vivo, using an oxygen sensor (i.e., India ink) injected into the tumor that is noninvasively scanned using EPR oximetry. Scans, converted into measurements of pO2, characterize the current tumor oxygen level at: (1) 'steady state' (while breathing room air), 2) response to hyperoxygenation therapy (inhaling oxygen-enriched air for 10 min), and 3) response to resuming inhaling room air. EPR measurements are repeated noninvasively throughout radiation or chemotherapy, to examine changes. The minimum number of visits depends on the patient's cohort; all may have additional measurements. If the ink injection is not surgically removed, EPR oximetry measurements can be repeated indefinitely.
3: Breast Cancers
Breast cancer patients whose treatment plan includes surgical resection followed by radiation therapy. All patients who receive a surgical resection will receive a Carlo Erba Ink injection in the radiation field after sufficient healing has occurred to the area to be injected, as determined in consultation with the treating physicians, and using topical anesthetic or local anesthetic, if the patient so desires. All patients in this cohort will be expected to agree to a minimum of one EPR Oximetry measurement in the planned radiation field prior to radiation and a minimum of one measurement made over the course of radiation therapy.
Carlo Erba Ink Injection
Carlo Erba India ink is used in this study as a paramagnetic oxygen sensor that is injected into tissue, and which, when measured using EPR Oximetry, can provide sensitive, repeated, and direct measurements of tissue oxygen. Each study participant will receive at least one ink injection of 20-50µL of Carlo Erba India Ink. The ink injection will occur within 5mm of the body surface (i.e., skin or mucosa), and may be injected into tumor, postsurgical field of radiation, and/or adjacent normal tissue. Carlo Erba Ink is an aqueous suspension composed of charcoal powder, water for injection, and a suspending agent. Carlo Erba is the name of the manufacturer that supplies the charcoal.
EPR Oximetry Measurement
An oximetry measurement visit consists of \~ 30 minutes of continuous scans of tissue oxygen in vivo, using an oxygen sensor (i.e., India ink) injected into the tumor that is noninvasively scanned using EPR oximetry. Scans, converted into measurements of pO2, characterize the current tumor oxygen level at: (1) 'steady state' (while breathing room air), 2) response to hyperoxygenation therapy (inhaling oxygen-enriched air for 10 min), and 3) response to resuming inhaling room air. EPR measurements are repeated noninvasively throughout radiation or chemotherapy, to examine changes. The minimum number of visits depends on the patient's cohort; all may have additional measurements. If the ink injection is not surgically removed, EPR oximetry measurements can be repeated indefinitely.
4: Other tumors
Other tumors within 5 mm of the surface, whose planned treatment includes radiotherapy of the tumor and does not include a planned resection of the tumor. As these other qualifying malignancies are expected to occur only rarely, they will be grouped into a single cohort despite potential varied histology. These patients will receive a Carlo Erba Ink injection in their tumor prior to radiation therapy. All patients in this cohort will be expected to agree to a minimum of one EPR Oximetry measurement in the planned radiation field prior to radiation and a minimum of one measurement made over the course of radiation therapy.
Carlo Erba Ink Injection
Carlo Erba India ink is used in this study as a paramagnetic oxygen sensor that is injected into tissue, and which, when measured using EPR Oximetry, can provide sensitive, repeated, and direct measurements of tissue oxygen. Each study participant will receive at least one ink injection of 20-50µL of Carlo Erba India Ink. The ink injection will occur within 5mm of the body surface (i.e., skin or mucosa), and may be injected into tumor, postsurgical field of radiation, and/or adjacent normal tissue. Carlo Erba Ink is an aqueous suspension composed of charcoal powder, water for injection, and a suspending agent. Carlo Erba is the name of the manufacturer that supplies the charcoal.
EPR Oximetry Measurement
An oximetry measurement visit consists of \~ 30 minutes of continuous scans of tissue oxygen in vivo, using an oxygen sensor (i.e., India ink) injected into the tumor that is noninvasively scanned using EPR oximetry. Scans, converted into measurements of pO2, characterize the current tumor oxygen level at: (1) 'steady state' (while breathing room air), 2) response to hyperoxygenation therapy (inhaling oxygen-enriched air for 10 min), and 3) response to resuming inhaling room air. EPR measurements are repeated noninvasively throughout radiation or chemotherapy, to examine changes. The minimum number of visits depends on the patient's cohort; all may have additional measurements. If the ink injection is not surgically removed, EPR oximetry measurements can be repeated indefinitely.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Carlo Erba Ink Injection
Carlo Erba India ink is used in this study as a paramagnetic oxygen sensor that is injected into tissue, and which, when measured using EPR Oximetry, can provide sensitive, repeated, and direct measurements of tissue oxygen. Each study participant will receive at least one ink injection of 20-50µL of Carlo Erba India Ink. The ink injection will occur within 5mm of the body surface (i.e., skin or mucosa), and may be injected into tumor, postsurgical field of radiation, and/or adjacent normal tissue. Carlo Erba Ink is an aqueous suspension composed of charcoal powder, water for injection, and a suspending agent. Carlo Erba is the name of the manufacturer that supplies the charcoal.
EPR Oximetry Measurement
An oximetry measurement visit consists of \~ 30 minutes of continuous scans of tissue oxygen in vivo, using an oxygen sensor (i.e., India ink) injected into the tumor that is noninvasively scanned using EPR oximetry. Scans, converted into measurements of pO2, characterize the current tumor oxygen level at: (1) 'steady state' (while breathing room air), 2) response to hyperoxygenation therapy (inhaling oxygen-enriched air for 10 min), and 3) response to resuming inhaling room air. EPR measurements are repeated noninvasively throughout radiation or chemotherapy, to examine changes. The minimum number of visits depends on the patient's cohort; all may have additional measurements. If the ink injection is not surgically removed, EPR oximetry measurements can be repeated indefinitely.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has an eligible tumor that is within 5 mm of the surface (either skin or mucosa) or has had a tumor removed with a tumor bed that is within 5 mm of the surface.
1. Eligible tumors types:
* Intraoral tumors: squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), melanoma;
* Primary cutaneous tumors (including, but not limited to): SCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC,) melanoma;
* Breast malignancies post surgery;
* Other tumors: any tumor within 5 mm of the surface and with planned radiation therapy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Previous adverse reaction to the suspending agent
3. Subject has a pacemaker that is not known to be MRI compatible
4. Subject has a non-removable implant or device with metal that is not known to be MRI compatible
5. Subject is pregnant or has a likelihood for becoming pregnant during the basic study timeframe.
Note: There is no known harm to the woman or her fetus from participating; this is precautionary only.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Philip Schaner
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philip Schaner
M.D., Ph.D., Associate Professor of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philip E Schaner, M.D., Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bacic G, Liu KJ, O'Hara JA, Harris RD, Szybinski K, Goda F, Swartz HM. Oxygen tension in a murine tumor: a combined EPR and MRI study. Magn Reson Med. 1993 Nov;30(5):568-72. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300507.
Baudelet C, Gallez B. How does blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast correlate with oxygen partial pressure (pO2) inside tumors? Magn Reson Med. 2002 Dec;48(6):980-6. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10318.
Brizel DM, Scully SP, Harrelson JM, Layfield LJ, Dodge RK, Charles HC, Samulski TV, Prosnitz LR, Dewhirst MW. Radiation therapy and hyperthermia improve the oxygenation of human soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Res. 1996 Dec 1;56(23):5347-50.
Brizel DM, Sibley GS, Prosnitz LR, Scher RL, Dewhirst MW. Tumor hypoxia adversely affects the prognosis of carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 May 1;38(2):285-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00101-6.
Charlier N, Beghein N, Gallez B. Development and evaluation of biocompatible inks for the local measurement of oxygen using in vivo EPR. NMR Biomed. 2004 Aug;17(5):303-10. doi: 10.1002/nbm.902.
Chaplin DJ, Horsman MR. Tumor blood flow changes induced by chemical modifiers of radiation response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;22(3):459-62. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90853-a.
Dardzinski BJ, Sotak CH. Rapid tissue oxygen tension mapping using 19F inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging of perfluoro-15-crown-5-ether. Magn Reson Med. 1994 Jul;32(1):88-97. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320112.
Demidenko E. Mixed models: theory and applications with R. John Wiley & Sons; 2013 Aug 26.
Dewhirst MW, Poulson JM, Yu D, Sanders L, Lora-Michiels M, Vujaskovic Z, Jones EL, Samulski TV, Powers BE, Brizel DM, Prosnitz LR, Charles HC. Relation between pO2, 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy parameters and treatment outcome in patients with high-grade soft tissue sarcomas treated with thermoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Feb 1;61(2):480-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.211.
Dunn JF, Ding S, O'Hara JA, Liu KJ, Rhodes E, Weaver JB, Swartz HM. The apparent diffusion constant measured by MRI correlates with pO2 in a RIF-1 tumor. Magn Reson Med. 1995 Oct;34(4):515-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340405.
Flood AB, Satinsky VA, Swartz HM. Comparing the Effectiveness of Methods to Measure Oxygen in Tissues for Prognosis and Treatment of Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;923:113-120. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38810-6_15.
Gallez B, Baudelet C, Jordan BF. Assessment of tumor oxygenation by electron paramagnetic resonance: principles and applications. NMR Biomed. 2004 Aug;17(5):240-62. doi: 10.1002/nbm.900.
Gallez B, Debuyst R, Dejehet F, Liu KJ, Walczak T, Goda F, Demeure R, Taper H, Swartz HM. Small particles of fusinite and carbohydrate chars coated with aqueous soluble polymers: preparation and applications for in vivo EPR oximetry. Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jul;40(1):152-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400120.
Gallez B, Swartz HM. In vivo EPR: when, how and why? NMR Biomed. 2004 Aug;17(5):223-5. doi: 10.1002/nbm.913.
Gatenby RA, Kessler HB, Rosenblum JS, Coia LR, Moldofsky PJ, Hartz WH, Broder GJ. Oxygen distribution in squamous cell carcinoma metastases and its relationship to outcome of radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988 May;14(5):831-8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(88)90002-8.
Glockner JF, Swartz HM. In vivo EPR oximetry using two novel probes: fusinite and lithium phthalocyanine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1992;317:229-34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-3428-0_24. No abstract available.
Glockner JF, Norby SW, Swartz HM. Simultaneous measurement of intracellular and extracellular oxygen concentrations using a nitroxide-liposome system. Magn Reson Med. 1993 Jan;29(1):12-8. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910290105.
Goda F, Liu KJ, Walczak T, O'Hara JA, Jiang J, Swartz HM. In vivo oximetry using EPR and India ink. Magn Reson Med. 1995 Feb;33(2):237-45. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330214.
Goda F, O'Hara JA, Rhodes ES, Liu KJ, Dunn JF, Bacic G, Swartz HM. Changes of oxygen tension in experimental tumors after a single dose of X-ray irradiation. Cancer Res. 1995 Jun 1;55(11):2249-52.
Goda F, O'Hara JA, Liu KJ, Rhodes ES, Dunn JF, Swartz HM. Comparisons of measurements of pO2 in tissue in vivo by EPR oximetry and microelectrodes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;411:543-9. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5865-1_67. No abstract available.
Haga T, Hirata H, Lesniewski P, Rychert KM, Williams BB, Flood AN, Swartz HM. L-band surface-coil resonator with voltage-control impedance-matching for EPR tooth dosimetry. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering. 2013 Feb 1;43(1):32-40.2013).
Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott. 1988.
Hees PS, Sotak CH. Assessment of changes in murine tumor oxygenation in response to nicotinamide using 19F NMR relaxometry of a perfluorocarbon emulsion. Magn Reson Med. 1993 Mar;29(3):303-10. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910290305.
Hirata H, Walczak T, Swartz HM. Electronically tunable surface-coil-type resonator for L-band EPR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 2000 Jan;142(1):159-67. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1927.
Hockel M, Schlenger K, Mitze M, Schaffer U, Vaupel P. Hypoxia and Radiation Response in Human Tumors. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1996 Jan;6(1):3-9. doi: 10.1053/SRAO0060003.
Hockel M, Vorndran B, Schlenger K, Baussmann E, Knapstein PG. Tumor oxygenation: a new predictive parameter in locally advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1993 Nov;51(2):141-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1993.1262.
Hyde JS and Subczynski, WK. Spin-label oximetry. (1989). Pp 399-425. In: Berliner LJ, Reuben J (ed). Spin Labeling: Theory and Applications. New York: Plenum Press. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0743-3_8
Islam PS, Chang C, Selmi C, Generali E, Huntley A, Teuber SS, Gershwin ME. Medical Complications of Tattoos: A Comprehensive Review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016 Apr;50(2):273-86. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8532-0.
Jordan BF, Baudelet C, Gallez B. Carbon-centered radicals as oxygen sensors for in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance: screening for an optimal probe among commercially available charcoals. MAGMA. 1998 Dec;7(2):121-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02592236.
Jordan BF, Gregoire V, Demeure RJ, Sonveaux P, Feron O, O'Hara J, Vanhulle VP, Delzenne N, Gallez B. Insulin increases the sensitivity of tumors to irradiation: involvement of an increase in tumor oxygenation mediated by a nitric oxide-dependent decrease of the tumor cells oxygen consumption. Cancer Res. 2002 Jun 15;62(12):3555-61.
Jordan BF, Misson P, Demeure R, Baudelet C, Beghein N, Gallez B. Changes in tumor oxygenation/perfusion induced by the no donor, isosorbide dinitrate, in comparison with carbogen: monitoring by EPR and MRI. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Sep 1;48(2):565-70. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00694-5.
Jordan BF, Sonveaux P, Feron O, Gregoire V, Beghein N, Gallez B. Nitric oxide-mediated increase in tumor blood flow and oxygenation of tumors implanted in muscles stimulated by electric pulses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 Mar 15;55(4):1066-73. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)04505-4.
Lartigau E, Randrianarivelo H, Avril MF, Margulis A, Spatz A, Eschwege F, Guichard M. Intratumoral oxygen tension in metastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1997 Oct;7(5):400-6. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199710000-00006.
Lartigau E, Lusinchi A, Eschwege F, Guichard M. Tumor oxygenation: the Institut Gustave Roussy experience. In: Vaupel P, Kelleher DK (ed). Tumor hypoxia pathophysiology, clinical significance and therapeutic perspectives. Stuttgart, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. 1999:47-52.
Liu KJ, Gast P, Moussavi M, Norby SW, Vahidi N, Walczak T, Wu M, Swartz HM. Lithium phthalocyanine: a probe for electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry in viable biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jun 15;90(12):5438-42. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.12.5438.
Nakashima T, Goda F, Jiang J, Shima T, Swartz HM. Use of EPR oximetry with India ink to measure the pO2 in the liver in vivo in mice. Magn Reson Med. 1995 Dec;34(6):888-92. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340614.
Nilges MJ, Walczak T, Swartz HM. GHz in vivo ESR spectrometer operating with a surface probe. Phys. Med. 1989;5:195-201.
Nordsmark M, Alsner J, Keller J, Nielsen OS, Jensen OM, Horsman MR, Overgaard J. Hypoxia in human soft tissue sarcomas: adverse impact on survival and no association with p53 mutations. Br J Cancer. 2001 Apr 20;84(8):1070-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1728.
Nordsmark M, Bentzen SM, Rudat V, Brizel D, Lartigau E, Stadler P, Becker A, Adam M, Molls M, Dunst J, Terris DJ, Overgaard J. Prognostic value of tumor oxygenation in 397 head and neck tumors after primary radiation therapy. An international multi-center study. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Oct;77(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
O'Hara JA, Goda F, Demidenko E, Swartz HM. Effect on regrowth delay in a murine tumor of scheduling split-dose irradiation based on direct pO2 measurements by electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry. Radiat Res. 1998 Nov;150(5):549-56.
O'Hara JA, Goda F, Liu KJ, Bacic G, Hoopes PJ, Swartz HM. The pO2 in a murine tumor after irradiation: an in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry study. Radiat Res. 1995 Nov;144(2):222-9.
O'Hara JA, Hou H, Demidenko E, Springett RJ, Khan N, Swartz HM. Simultaneous measurement of rat brain cortex PtO2 using EPR oximetry and a fluorescence fiber-optic sensor during normoxia and hyperoxia. Physiol Meas. 2005 Jun;26(3):203-13. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/26/3/006. Epub 2005 Feb 25.
O'Hara JA, Khan N, Hou H, Wilmo CM, Demidenko E, Dunn JF, Swartz HM. Comparison of EPR oximetry and Eppendorf polarographic electrode assessments of rat brain PtO2. Physiol Meas. 2004 Dec;25(6):1413-23. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/25/6/007.
Petryakov SV, Schreiber W, Kmiec MM, Williams BB, Swartz HM. Surface Dielectric Resonators for X-band EPR Spectroscopy. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2016 Dec;172(1-3):127-132. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw167. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
Salikhov I, Hirata H, Walczak T, Swartz HM. An improved external loop resonator for in vivo L-band EPR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 2003 Sep;164(1):54-9. doi: 10.1016/s1090-7807(03)00175-7.
Salikhov IK, Swartz HM. Measurement of specific absorption rate for clinical EPR at 1200 MHz. Applied Magnetic Resonance. 2005 Jun 1;29(2):287-91.
Smirnov AI, Norby SW, Clarkson RB, Walczak T, Swartz HM. Simultaneous multi-site EPR spectroscopy in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 1993 Aug;30(2):213-20. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300210.
Smirnov AI, Norby SW, Walczak T, Liu KJ, Swartz HM. Physical and instrumental considerations in the use of lithium phthalocyanine for measurements of the concentration of the oxygen. J Magn Reson B. 1994 Feb;103(2):95-102. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1994.1016.
Swartz HM. Using EPR to measure a critical but often unmeasured component of oxidative damage: oxygen. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2004 Jun;6(3):677-86. doi: 10.1089/152308604773934440.
Swartz HM. EPR Studies of Cells and Tissue. In: Foundations Of Modern EPR 1998 (pp. 451-459).
Swartz HM. Potential Medical (Clinical) Applications of EPR: Overview & Perspectives. InIn Vivo EPR (ESR) 2003 (pp. 599-621). Springer US.
Swartz HM, Clarkson RB. The measurement of oxygen in vivo using EPR techniques. Phys Med Biol. 1998 Jul;43(7):1957-75. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/43/7/017.
Swartz HM, Dunn JF. Measurements of oxygen in tissues: overview and perspectives on methods. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2003;530:1-12. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0075-9_1.
Swartz HM, Dunn J, Grinberg O, O'Hara J, Walczak T. What does EPR oximetry with solid particles measure--and how does this relate to other measures of PO2? Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;428:663-70. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5399-1_93. No abstract available.
Swartz HM, Halpern H. EPR studies of living animals and related model systems (in vivo EPR). InBiological magnetic resonance 2002 (pp. 367-404). Springer US.
Swartz HM, Hou H, Khan N, Jarvis LA, Chen EY, Williams BB, Kuppusamy P. Advances in probes and methods for clinical EPR oximetry. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;812:73-79. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0620-8_10.
Khan N, Grinberg O, Wilmot C, Kiefer H, Swartz HM. "Distant spin trapping": a method for expanding the availability of spin trapping measurements. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2005 Feb 28;62(2):125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2004.10.001. Epub 2004 Nov 13.
Swartz HM, Khan N, Buckey J, Comi R, Gould L, Grinberg O, Hartford A, Hopf H, Hou H, Hug E, Iwasaki A, Lesniewski P, Salikhov I, Walczak T. Clinical applications of EPR: overview and perspectives. NMR Biomed. 2004 Aug;17(5):335-51. doi: 10.1002/nbm.911.
Swartz, HM, N. Khan, B.B. Williams, A.C. Hartford, B. Zaki, M. Ernstoff, J.C. Buckey, F.F. Gubaidullin, H. Hou, P. Lesniewski, M. Kmiec, O.Y. Grinberg, A. Sucheta, and T. Walczak, Clinical Applications of In Vivo EPR: EPR Oximetry in Treasures of Eureka, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance From Fundamental Research To Pioneering Applications & Zavoisky Award, Volume 1, Axas Publishing, New Zealand, pp. 178-179 (2009).
Swartz HM, Iwasaki A, Walczak T, Demidenko E, Salikov I, Lesniewski P, Starewicz P, Schauer D, Romanyukha A. Measurements of clinically significant doses of ionizing radiation using non-invasive in vivo EPR spectroscopy of teeth in situ. Appl Radiat Isot. 2005 Feb;62(2):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.08.016.
Swartz HM, Liu KJ, Goda F, Walczak T. India ink: a potential clinically applicable EPR oximetry probe. Magn Reson Med. 1994 Feb;31(2):229-32. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310218.
Swartz, HM, R.P. Mason, N. Hogg, B. Kalyanaraman, T. Sarna, P.M. Plonka, M. Zareb, P.L. Gutierrez, and L.J. Berliner, Free Radicals and Medicine, in Biomedical ESR a volume in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Series (S.S. Eaton, G.R. Eaton, L.J. Berliner, eds.), Kluwer Publisher (The Netherlands, New York, Boston), Chapter 3, pp. 25-74 (2004a).
Swartz HM, Williams BB, Jarvis LA, Zaki BI, Gladstone DJ. Repeated monitoring of tumor oxygen while breathing carbogen to determine the therapeutic potential of hyperoxic therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2013 Apr-Jun;3(2 Suppl 1):S23-4. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2013.01.084. Epub 2013 Mar 25. No abstract available.
Swartz HM, Williams BB, Hou H, Khan N, Jarvis LA, Chen EY, Schaner PE, Ali A, Gallez B, Kuppusamy P, Flood AB. Direct and Repeated Clinical Measurements of pO2 for Enhancing Cancer Therapy and Other Applications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;923:95-104. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-38810-6_13.
Swartz HM, Williams BB, Zaki BI, Hartford AC, Jarvis LA, Chen EY, Comi RJ, Ernstoff MS, Hou H, Khan N, Swarts SG, Flood AB, Kuppusamy P. Clinical EPR: unique opportunities and some challenges. Acad Radiol. 2014 Feb;21(2):197-206. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.10.011.
Tremper KK, Friedman AE, Levine EM, Lapin R, Camarillo D. The preoperative treatment of severely anemic patients with a perfluorochemical oxygen-transport fluid, Fluosol-DA. N Engl J Med. 1982 Jul 29;307(5):277-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198207293070503.
Vaeth JM. Hyperbaric oxygen and radiation therapy of cancer. Frontiers of Radiation Therapy and Oncology. 1: 195 (1968).
Vahidi N, Clarkson RB, Liu KJ, Norby SW, Wu M, Swartz HM. In vivo and in vitro EPR oximetry with fusinite: a new coal-derived, particulate EPR probe. Magn Reson Med. 1994 Feb;31(2):139-46. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310207.
Vaupel P. Tumor microenvironmental physiology and its implications for radiation oncology. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jul;14(3):198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2004.04.008.
Vaupel P, Hockel M, Mayer A. Detection and characterization of tumor hypoxia using pO2 histography. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007 Aug;9(8):1221-35. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.1628.
Williams BB, Khan N, Zaki B, Hartford A, Ernstoff MS, Swartz HM. Clinical electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry using India ink. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;662:149-56. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1241-1_21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29880 D17008
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id