Long-term Efficacy of Ablative Fractional Laser-assisted Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Lower Extremity Bowen's Disease

NCT ID: NCT03320447

Last Updated: 2017-10-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-10-30

Study Completion Date

2017-10-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Er:YAG ablative fractional laser-assisted methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (AFL-PDT) has shown significantly higher efficacy and a lower recurrence rate at 12 months than methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT) for treatment of Bowen's disease (BD). However, long-term follow up data are not available.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To compare the long-term efficacy and recurrence rates of AFL-PDT and standard MAL-PDT for the treatment of lower extremity BD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bowen's Disease

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ablative fractional laser photodynamic therapy protoporphyrin IX methy-aminolevulinate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MAL-PDT

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either AFL-PDT or MAL-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. As result, the patients were randomized to treatment with AFL-PDT or MAL-PDT

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

methyl-aminolevulinate application

Intervention Type DRUG

Immediately after the AFL, a 1-mm thick layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (16% Metvix® cream; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of the surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm; 3M, Co., Saint Paul, MN, USA) for 3 h, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light.

Illuminating using red light-emitting diode lamps

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each treatment area was then separately illuminated using red light-emitting diode lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma S.A., Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and a total light dose of 37 J/cm2. Areas scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later. During the illumination, patients were asked to evaluate pain intensity using an 11-point visual analog scale.

AFL-PDT

Patients were randomly assigned to receive either AFL-PDT or MAL-PDT in a 1:1 ratio. As result, the patients were randomized to treatment with AFL-PDT or MAL-PDT

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

lidocaine-prilocaine 5% cream application

Intervention Type DRUG

The lesions were then cleansed with saline gauze, and a lidocaine-prilocaine 5% cream (EMLA®; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area for 30 min under occlusion

2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

After the anesthetic cream was removed, AFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a 500 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse

methyl-aminolevulinate application

Intervention Type DRUG

Immediately after the AFL, a 1-mm thick layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (16% Metvix® cream; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of the surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm; 3M, Co., Saint Paul, MN, USA) for 3 h, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light.

Illuminating using red light-emitting diode lamps

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each treatment area was then separately illuminated using red light-emitting diode lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma S.A., Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and a total light dose of 37 J/cm2. Areas scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later. During the illumination, patients were asked to evaluate pain intensity using an 11-point visual analog scale.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

lidocaine-prilocaine 5% cream application

The lesions were then cleansed with saline gauze, and a lidocaine-prilocaine 5% cream (EMLA®; Astra Pharmaceuticals, LP, Westborough, MA, USA) was applied to the treatment area for 30 min under occlusion

Intervention Type DRUG

2940-nm Er:YAG AFL pretreatment

After the anesthetic cream was removed, AFL was performed using a 2940-nm Er:YAG AFL (Joule; Sciton, Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA) with a 500 µm ablation depth, level 1 coagulation, 22% treatment density, and a single pulse

Intervention Type DEVICE

methyl-aminolevulinate application

Immediately after the AFL, a 1-mm thick layer of methyl-aminolevulinate (16% Metvix® cream; PhotoCure ASA, Oslo, Norway) was applied to the lesion and to 5 mm of the surrounding healthy tissue. The area was covered with an occlusive dressing (Tegaderm; 3M, Co., Saint Paul, MN, USA) for 3 h, after which the remaining cream was removed with saline gauze, and the red fluorescence of porphyrins was visualized with Wood's light.

Intervention Type DRUG

Illuminating using red light-emitting diode lamps

Each treatment area was then separately illuminated using red light-emitting diode lamps (Aktilite CL128; Galderma S.A., Bruchsal, Germany) with peak emission at 632 nm and a total light dose of 37 J/cm2. Areas scheduled to receive MAL-PDT received the second treatment 7 days later. During the illumination, patients were asked to evaluate pain intensity using an 11-point visual analog scale.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* •Patients aged 18 years or more who diagnosed as bowen's disease

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy or lactation
* active systemic infectious disease
* other inflammatory, infectious, or neoplastic skin diseases in the treated area
* allergy to MAL,other topical photosensitizers, or excipients of the cream
* history of photosensitivity
* use of immunosuppressive or photosensitizing drugs
* participation in any other investigational study in the preceding 30 days
* history or indicators of poor compliance
Minimum Eligible Age

42 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dong-A University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Song Ki-Hoon

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DAUderma-09

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id