Treatment of Ex-vivo Small Bowel Mucosa With a Dedicated Radiofrequency Ablation (SB-RFA) Catheter.

NCT ID: NCT03320395

Last Updated: 2017-10-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-30

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia (GIAD, a.k.a. angioectasia, arteriovenous malformations or AVM, and vascular ectasia) are mucosal or submucosal dilated blood vessels, usually multifocal, and a frequent cause of obscure GI bleeding, especially mid-small bowel hemorrhage.

Endoscopic treatment using argon plasma coagulation (APC) is popular but presents limitations as application of the therapy is not uniform, and passing the catheter repetitively through the enteroscope may not be possible. Despite endoscopic treatment rebleeding rates are high, between 25 to 50%.

An improvement in our ability to treat GIAD endoscopically is desirable. An ablation catheter would need to be easy to use repetitively through the enteroscope, be more maneuverable to direct treatment to the lesions, and also cover more area of intestinal mucosa per treatment compared to APC, and it should be low risk for damage to the healthy intestinal mucosa.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may hold the answer. It's efficacy for treatment of superficial Barrett esophagus is undisputed, and it has recently been used with success to treat gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) a condition which is remarkably similar to GIAD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia (GIAD, a.k.a. angioectasia, arteriovenous malformations or AVM, and vascular ectasia) are mucosal or submucosal dilated blood vessels lined by epithelium with no overlying mucosal lesion formed due to a combination of sub-mucosal vein obstruction, hypoxemia and neovascularization. It is a frequent cause of obscure GI bleeding, and the most common finding when evaluating mid-small bowel hemorrhage. It is also more common in patients with underlying valvular heart disease (especially aortic stenosis), end-stage renal disease, and von Willebrand disease (acquired or congenital). These lesions are usually multifocal as forty to 60% of the patients will have more than one About half stop bleeding spontaneously but at least a quarter of patients will suffer recurrent GI bleeding manifested by overt bleeding (melena or hematochezia), persistent fecal occult blood or persistent iron deficiency anemia.

Management includes endoscopic therapy, surgery, therapeutic angiography, and pharmacological treatment. Endoscopic therapy including thermal methods (multi-polar electrocoagulation, argon plasma coagulation, laser), injections (sclerosants, saline, epinephrine), and mechanical methods (hemostatic clips, band ligators) are widely used to treat all causes of GI bleeding including GIAD. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is the preferred mode of endoscopic therapy for GIAD due to availability, relative ease of use, and a perceived superficial rather than deep depth of burn; however, studies have shown that depth of tissue injury can be substantial. APC therapy may not be uniform as adequacy and depth of ablation depends on the presence of debris, mucous or blood between the APC probe and tissue, and the ability to target the tissue in the presence of breathing, intestinal peristalsis, and scope position. The APC catheter can also bend during repeated insertions, a necessary maneuver to remove the burned tissue debris on the tip of the catheter which otherwise affects the argon plasma beam and this may terminally damage it.

Angioectasia rebleeding rates are high, at least 25 to over 50%. An improvement in our ability to treat small bowel GIAD is desirable. An ablation catheter would need to be easy to use repetitively through the enteroscope, be more maneuverable to direct treatment to the lesions, and also cover more area of intestinal mucosa per treatment compared to APC, and it should be low risk for damage to the healthy intestinal mucosa while treating GIAD.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may hold the answer. It's efficacy for treatment of superficial Barrett esophagus is undisputed, and it has recently been used with success to treat gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) a condition which is remarkably similar to GIAD.

This study will determine the depth of burn achieved on fresh and healthy small bowel explants using a dedicated small bowel RFA catheter at usual RFA settings.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Angiodysplasia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Small bowel RFA treatment

Five small bowel samples each of the duodenum, jejunum and ileum will be recruited treated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Small bowel RFA treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

The samples will be spread and fixed using needles. The prototype RFA-SB ablation catheter will be applied by the PI as follows to each section of duodenum, jejunum and ileum.

The treating paddle of the prototype RFA-SB catheter will be pushed on the small bowel mucosa exerting the same pressure that would be applied endoscopically.

12 J/cm2 will be applied every time with a 20 second interval between applications to simulate clinical practice.

There will be two single applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two double applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two triple applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two quadruple applications to two separate specimen sites.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Small bowel RFA treatment

The samples will be spread and fixed using needles. The prototype RFA-SB ablation catheter will be applied by the PI as follows to each section of duodenum, jejunum and ileum.

The treating paddle of the prototype RFA-SB catheter will be pushed on the small bowel mucosa exerting the same pressure that would be applied endoscopically.

12 J/cm2 will be applied every time with a 20 second interval between applications to simulate clinical practice.

There will be two single applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two double applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two triple applications to two separate specimen sites. There will be two quadruple applications to two separate specimen sites.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Understand and provide informed consent.
* All patients must be over 18 years of age, otherwise no age restrictions.
* Healthy small bowel tissue has cleared by pathology as tissue that would otherwise be discarded.
* Patients who are undergoing planned resection of the small bowel will be recruited until the study endpoints are met.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to provide informed consent.
* Inability to isolate disease free section of small bowel or sufficient small bowel to perform SB-RFA treatment..
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Cleveland Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FLA 16-032

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id