Transcultural Validation of the Oxford Shoulder Score for the French-speaking Population

NCT ID: NCT03320356

Last Updated: 2017-11-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

144 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Degenerative lesions of the shoulder occur very frequently and their incidence increases with age. The Constant-Murley score is currently considered the gold standard in Europe to assess the shoulder and is widely used by the orthopaedic community to follow up on shoulder pathologies. However, healthcare professionals are taking an increasing interest in self-administered patient-reported out-come measures. Several self-administered questionnaires are available to assess the shoulder. Among these questionnaires, the OSS (Oxford Shoulder Score) is considered to be quick, simple, and reliable for the English-speaking population. This score was initially developed at the University of Oxford in 1996. It is a self-administered questionnaire designed to evaluate pain and shoulder function through 12 questions. This score has since been adapted in different languages but not in French.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim was to develop a translation and a transcultural adaptation of the OSS and to assess its validity in native French-speaker patients with shoulder pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

shoulder pain

Patients presenting inflammatory, degenerative, or post-traumatic shoulder pain and consulting at Orthopaedic Department, Reims Teaching Hospital.

the French version of the Oxford Shoulder Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

the French version of the Oxford Shoulder Score

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tumors in Ambulatory Medicine Unit of the Reims University Hospital (France) between May 14, 2012 and July 31, 2013
* native French speakers

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who presented shoulder's instability problems
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

CHU de Reims

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tuton D, Barbe C, Salmon JH, Drame M, Nerot C, Ohl X. Transcultural validation of the Oxford Shoulder Score for the French-speaking population. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Sep;102(5):555-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27460650 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016Ao001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id