Prospective Study of the Evaluation of Disease contRol and the Quality of Life of Patients With depressiOn and With or Without aNxiety disOrders in the Greek populatIon
NCT ID: NCT03317262
Last Updated: 2019-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
800 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-03-01
2019-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) is the psychiatric disorder characterized by a multitude of diverse organic responses as well as a generalized, persistent and indeterminate anxiety that covers almost all of the individual's activities. It is a diffuse and intense negative mood and anxiety that is present for most of the day and whose exact causes are often undetectable.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treatment of Mild and Subthreshold Depressive Disorders
NCT00226642
Effects of Citalopram on Hostility and CHD Risk
NCT00217828
Pipamperone/Citalopram (PNB01) Versus Citalopram (CIT) and Versus Pipamperone (PIP) in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
NCT01312922
Antidepressant Controlled Trial for Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia
NCT01032083
Study of Medication and Placebo Response in Major Depression
NCT00229476
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The scores are scored through the symptoms reported by the patient during the interview, the evaluator's observations and the information collected from third parties (relatives, nurses). The markings do not distinguish between the intensity and frequency of the symptoms, but these two should be equally at the discretion of the assessor. The scale covers the condition of the patient in the week preceding the mark for most symptoms, except for sleep disorders related to the last three days.Health-related quality of life is calculated using weighted questionnaires focusing on the general health level of the individual or the impact of specific diseases on the quality of life of the patient.
These questionnaires are based on a common theoretical background, according to which the measurement of biological functionality is a basic, but not sufficient, assessment of health. Apart from the good functioning of organic systems, which represents the traditional biomedical model of health, the need for an assessment of the general well-being and functioning of the individual in all areas of his life is also important.
The EQ-5D questionnaire is a self-completed tool for measuring the quality of life and consists of two parts:
The first part records the person's health profile. Five dimensions are used, referring to (a) mobility, (b) self-handling, (c) routine activities, (d) pain-discomfort and (e) stress-depression. Each of these dimensions takes three values: 1 = no problem, 2 = some problems, 3 = significant problems. Altogether, three health situations are recorded, representing 243 cases. The best mental state is described as "11111", meaning that there is no problem in terms of mobility, self-care, routine activities, pain and anxiety. The worst mental health status gets the "33333" values, which means significant problems in the above five dimensions.
The second part presents a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the form of a "health thermometer", which takes values from 0 = worse mental health to 100 = excellent mental health. Intermediate values of the optical proportional scale indicate intermediate health status. This scale is based on the person's subjective assessments of his / her state of health.
Using the EQ-5D, it is possible to estimate the benefit enjoyed by the individual from different health situations.
The HAM-A scale was one of the first assessment scales developed to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms and is still used up to now in both clinical and research environments.
The scale consists of 14 elements, which are determined by a series of symptoms, and measures both mental (mental stimulation and psychological discomfort as well as physical anxiety (physical anxiety disorders).
Each question is scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very serious), with a total score of 0 to 56. A score of less than 17 indicates mild severity, 18-24 mild to moderate severity and 25-30 mild to severe.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female asthma patients over 18 years of age
* Compliance with treatment
* Compliance with study procedures
* Patients already receiving or to receive citalopram
* Patients not adequately controlled by citalopram
* Patients not adequately controlled by citalopram and at the same time having a generalized anxiety disorder
* Patients not regulated at all
Exclusion Criteria
* Male or female asthma patients under 18 years of age
* Non-compliance with treatment
* Non-compliance in study procedures
* Patients who do not meet the Product SmPC criteria
* Patients receiving MAO inhibitors
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Elpen Pharmaceutical Co. Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Private Office
Larissa, , Greece
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-CTL-EL-76
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.