Neuraxial Anaesthesia: Does BMI Relate to Ease of Neuraxial Anaesthesia?
NCT ID: NCT03315845
Last Updated: 2017-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-23
2018-01-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In our institution, there is a 'standard practice' for neuraxial procedures, with a 'standard' needle used for first attempts (Whitacre 25G 90mm for spinal, Tuohy 18G 80mm for epidural). If the operator has not reached the desired space (spinal or epidural) with the needle inserted to 8cm, a longer needle is then considered for further attempts. This exposes the patient to at least one extra neuraxial needle insertion. Studies have shown that increased needle insertions and redirections are associated with increased complications.
We hypothesised that a large number of patients with BMI\>30kg/m2 would have a depth of spinal/epidural space that is greater than the length of the 'standard' needle used. Therefore we suggest that practice should change to use the longer needle or a combined spinal-epidural on the first attempt in these patients.
To test our hypothesis, we will assess the ease of palpation of the following anatomical landmarks: anterior and posterior iliac crests; lumbar spinous processes; scapulae; and sacral cornua. We will then perform neuraxial sonography of the lumbar spine, measuring depth to epidural space. Finally we will measure waist circumference in those patients with BMI \<30kg/m2.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Palpation of bony landmarks for neuraxial anaesthesia.
Manual palpation of anterior and posterior iliac crests; lumbar spinous processes; scapulae; and sacral cornua.
Ultrasound of neuraxial anatomy to assess depth to epidural space.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Maternity Hospital, Ireland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Moninne Creaney
Dr. Moninne Creaney, Specialist Registrar in Anaesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin McKeating
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
National Maternity Hospital, Ireland
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arzola C, Mikhael R, Margarido C, Carvalho JC. Spinal ultrasound versus palpation for epidural catheter insertion in labour: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):499-505. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000119.
Ansari T, Yousef A, El Gamassy A, Fayez M. Ultrasound-guided spinal anaesthesia in obstetrics: is there an advantage over the landmark technique in patients with easily palpable spines? Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Aug;23(3):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
Srinivasan KK, Lee PJ, Iohom G. Ultrasound for neuraxial blockade. Med Ultrason. 2014 Dec;16(4):356-63.
Grau T, Leipold RW, Delorme S, Martin E, Motsch J. Ultrasound imaging of the thoracic epidural space. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):200-6. doi: 10.1053/rapm.2002.29239.
Carnie J, Boden J, Gao Smith F. Prediction by computerised tomography of distance from skin to epidural space during thoracic epidural insertion. Anaesthesia. 2002 Jul;57(7):701-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02572_4.x.
Gnaho A, Nguyen V, Villevielle T, Frota M, Marret E, Gentili ME. Assessing the depth of the subarachnoid space by ultrasound. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Jul;62(4):520-30. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(12)70150-2.
Seligman KM, Weiniger CF, Carvalho B. The Accuracy of a Handheld Ultrasound Device for Neuraxial Depth and Landmark Assessment: A Prospective Cohort Trial. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jun;126(6):1995-1998. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002407.
Balki M, Lee Y, Halpern S, Carvalho JC. Ultrasound imaging of the lumbar spine in the transverse plane: the correlation between estimated and actual depth to the epidural space in obese parturients. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jun;108(6):1876-81. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a323f6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NationalMHI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id