Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of a Transdiagnostic, Emotion-focused Group Intervention for Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders (NCT NCT03315208)
NCT ID: NCT03315208
Last Updated: 2021-04-01
Results Overview
Participants in the UP condition will complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) at post-treatment to assess acceptability of and satisfaction with the experimental intervention. Range of the scale is 8 (minimum) to 32 (maximum), with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with treatment received.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
At the end of the 8-week treatment period
2021-04-01
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from November 2017 to July 2019 from an outpatient treatment program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Participants were randomized in cohorts of 5. Thus, participants underwent a "waiting to be randomized" period from enrollment until the date they were randomized. 9 participants were excluded between the point of enrollment to randomization; 8 due to not meeting inclusion criteria, and 1 withdrawn by the PI while waiting to be randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
29
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16
|
12
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
11
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of a Transdiagnostic, Emotion-focused Group Intervention for Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=29 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=18 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Total
n=47 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=5 Participants
|
21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=7 Participants
|
21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
ODSIS
|
8.90 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.18 • n=5 Participants
|
9.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.84 • n=7 Participants
|
8.96 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.00 • n=5 Participants
|
|
PHQ-9
|
12.69 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.79 • n=5 Participants
|
12.89 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.28 • n=7 Participants
|
12.77 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.67 • n=5 Participants
|
|
GAD-7
|
10.52 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.13 • n=5 Participants
|
9.28 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.85 • n=7 Participants
|
10.04 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.39 • n=5 Participants
|
|
OASIS
|
9.03 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.19 • n=5 Participants
|
9.11 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.24 • n=7 Participants
|
9.06 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.16 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BSS
|
3.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.11 • n=5 Participants
|
3.23 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.41 • n=7 Participants
|
3.61 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.80 • n=5 Participants
|
|
CSS
|
15.24 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.95 • n=5 Participants
|
16.72 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.26 • n=7 Participants
|
15.81 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.06 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Craving Scale
|
17.48 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.64 • n=5 Participants
|
14.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96 • n=7 Participants
|
16.47 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.21 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Past 30-day PDA
|
51.84 percentage of days abstinent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 34.44 • n=5 Participants
|
61.30 percentage of days abstinent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 36.61 • n=7 Participants
|
55.46 percentage of days abstinent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.20 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Past-month NSSI (SITBI)
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Past-month SI (SITBI)
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: 13 participants who attended at least 1 Unified Protocol session completed the CSQ-8.
Participants in the UP condition will complete the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) at post-treatment to assess acceptability of and satisfaction with the experimental intervention. Range of the scale is 8 (minimum) to 32 (maximum), with higher scores indicating greater levels of satisfaction with treatment received.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=13 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU
|
28.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Total numbers randomized to each condition
Percentage of participants who dropout from treatment during the 8 week study period in the UP+TAU condition will be compared to the percentage of those who drop out from treatment in the TAU condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=29 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=18 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Adding UP Group Intervention to TAU
|
13 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the OASIS at the post-treatment assessment (means at post-treatment reported below).
Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) administered at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
OASIS
|
5.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.80
|
6.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the post-treatment assessments (means reported below).
Measured with the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-20; higher scores indicate higher levels of depressive symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Depressive Symptoms Scale (ODSIS)
|
6.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.54
|
4.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.93
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the post-treatment assessment (means reported below).
Measured with the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSI) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate higher levels of suicidal ideation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Suicidal Ideation
|
2.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.56
|
1.09 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.47
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodMeasured with the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI) at post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Reported Nonsuicidal Self-injury in the Past Month
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the post-treatment assessment (means reported below).
Measured with the Commitment to Sobriety Scale (CSS) at post-treatment. Total scores range from 5-30; higher scores indicate higher levels of commitment to sobriety.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Commitment to Sobriety
|
16.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.55
|
17.27 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.90
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the post-treatment assessment (means reported below).
Measured with a three-item craving scale at post-treatment. Total scores range from 0-27; higher scores indicate higher levels of substance craving.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Substance Craving
|
12.88 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
8.45 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At the end of the 8-week treatment periodPopulation: Participants who completed the post-treatment assessment (means presented below).
Operationalized with the percentage days abstinent (PDA) in the past 30 days, measured via Timeline Follow Back (TLFB) at post-treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=16 Participants
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=11 Participants
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Past 30 Days Abstinent From Substances
|
72.29 percentage of past 30 days abstinent
Standard Deviation 28.77
|
68.89 percentage of past 30 days abstinent
Standard Deviation 21.41
|
Adverse Events
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
Treatment As Usual Alone
Not Randomized
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=29 participants at risk
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=18 participants at risk
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Not Randomized
n=9 participants at risk
Participants in this arm were enrolled and completed the baseline visit but never randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Relapse to substances (resulting in inpatient treatment)
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Relapse to substances (resulting in emergency department visit))
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Active suicidal ideation with plan (resulting in inpatient treatment)
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Active suicidal ideation with plan (without inpatient treatment)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increase in psychotic symptoms (resulting in inpatient treatment)
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Pseudoseizure (resulting in emergency department visit)
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Unified Protocol + Treatment As Usual
n=29 participants at risk
Participants in this arm are offered 16 twice-weekly group UP sessions in addition to TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Unified Protocol (UP): The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-based psychological intervention designed to be applied across anxiety, depressive, and other disorders in which emotion dysregulation is central. The UP targets shared temperamental vulnerabilities to emotional disorders through emotion-focused CBT strategies.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Treatment As Usual Alone
n=18 participants at risk
Participants in this arm undergo TAU at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
Treatment as Usual (TAU): Treatment as Usual consists of some combination of group therapy, individual therapy, and/or psychopharmacology appointments at an existing comprehensive outpatient program for adolescents and young adults with substance use disorders.
|
Not Randomized
n=9 participants at risk
Participants in this arm were enrolled and completed the baseline visit but never randomized.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Relapse to substances (without medical attention)
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Substance use resulting in emergency department visit (not hospitalized)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Non-fatal overdose (without seeking medical attention)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Entered intensive outpatient program for substance use
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased suicidal ideation or urges to engage in nonsuicidal self-injury
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 4 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased depressive symptoms
|
24.1%
7/29 • Number of events 7 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased anxiety-related symptoms
|
6.9%
2/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
16.7%
3/18 • Number of events 3 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Cognitively impaired in context of increased anxiety/substance use (resulting in emergency departmen
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased manic symptoms
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased restlessness
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased binge eating
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased stress (related to study group participation)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Increased stress (not study-related)
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Adverse reaction to non-study medication
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Flu
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Headaches/migraine
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Weight gain
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Chest tightness attributed to onset of electronic cigarette use
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Head injury
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Contracted STD
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnea symptoms
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Asthma symptoms
|
0.00%
0/29 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
5.6%
1/18 • Number of events 2 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
|
General disorders
Abdominal pain/nausea/vomiting (in context of early withdrawal)
|
3.4%
1/29 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/18 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Adverse event data were collected during the active study period (baseline to post-treatment assessment). Because the "waiting be be randomized" period (between baseline and date of randomization) varied across participants, the total study period lasted between 2 and 6 months.
Adverse events were collected at the mid- and post-treatment assessments, which happened at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively, after the date of randomization, via systematic assessment. Non-systematic assessment was also used to collect information about adverse events by reviewing participants' electronic health records weekly during the study period.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Kate Bentley
Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place