MedDataX Logo

Determine the Point of View of Society Society to Natural Orifice Surgeon

NCT ID: NCT03311893

Last Updated: 2017-10-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-10

Study Completion Date

2017-08-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

200 participants' perception and acceptability of natural hole surgeon

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

100 participants health personnel 100 participants population two group's perception and acceptability of natural orifice surgeon

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health, Subjective

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

health personnel

natural orifice surgery evaluation of the awareness of the use of transvaginal, transoral and trananal approach in surgical excision and the difference between the health staff and population

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

natural orifice surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

evaluation of the awareness of the use of transvaginal, transoral and transcranial approach in surgical excision and the difference between the health staff and the pathology

population

natural orifice surgery evaluation of the awareness of the use of transvaginal, transoral and trananal approach in surgical excision and the difference between the health staff and population

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

natural orifice surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

evaluation of the awareness of the use of transvaginal, transoral and transcranial approach in surgical excision and the difference between the health staff and the pathology

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

natural orifice surgery

evaluation of the awareness of the use of transvaginal, transoral and transcranial approach in surgical excision and the difference between the health staff and the pathology

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all female (health personnel and population)

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

17 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Inonu University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ersin Gündoğan

operator doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ersin Gündoğan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Inonu Unıversity- general surgery

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2016/199

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id