Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice Base on Patient Specific Physiology

NCT ID: NCT03308773

Last Updated: 2024-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Total Enrollment

5000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-05

Study Completion Date

2027-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is well known that the Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease are preceded by over ten years by metabolic dysfunction and anatomic changes that can be quantified. In order to develop effective preventive strategies and reduce the cost burden to the health care system, recognition of the earliest pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is clinically relevant. The interval retrospective evaluation of data from patient records, reflect the effectiveness of the various treatments implemented in clinical practice.

Prevalence of "prediabetes" among American adults is estimated to be \~84 million, or one out of three Americans. Over a 5-7 year period approximately one third of these prediabetic individuals will progress to type 2 diabetes. Prediabetes is a heterogenous group comprised of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and increased A1c (5.7-6.4%). Although different pathophysiologies are present in individuals with IFG and IGT, their conversion rate to overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is similar.

Insulin resistance is a common causal feature of many of the pathophysiologic mechanisms linking macrovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Because hyperglycemia is the major factor responsible for the development of microvascular complications, it logically follows that prevention of progression of prediabetes to overt diabetes should retard/prevent the development of the microvascular complications. From the measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, and c-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test, one can derive measures of the two core defects responsible for the development of T2DM, i.e. insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction as well as the degree of dysglycemia.

By combining a standard medical evaluation with the evaluation of cardiovascular biomarkers, patients at intermediate risk of vascular disease can be identified. In these patients, carotid intima media thickness (IMT) and carotid plaque evaluation is offered to attempt to clarify risk.

The hypothesis of this observational study is that the characterization of the physiology and anatomy of patients at risk of developing type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease can stratify risk of developing disease and direct treatment strategies tailored to the identified physiologic defect, leading to improvements in the delay or prevention of disease.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It is well known that the Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease are preceded by over ten years by metabolic dysfunction and anatomic changes that can be quantified. In order to develop effective preventive strategies and reduce the cost burden to the health care system, recognition of the earliest pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes and vascular disease is clinically relevant. In patients with risk factors for type 2 diabetes and/or vascular disease, we have quantified this dysmetabolic state using glucose tolerance testing to quantify insulin resistance and beta cell function while measuring vascular biomarkers as well as Intima-media thickness and carotid plaque to characterize cardiovascular risk. The interval retrospective evaluation of data from patient records, reflect the effectiveness of the various treatments implemented in clinical practice.

Prevalence of "prediabetes" among American adults is estimated to be \~84 million, or one out of three Americans. Over a 5-7 year period approximately one third of these prediabetic individuals will progress to type 2 diabetes. Prediabetes is a heterogenous group comprised of individuals with impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and increased A1c (5.7-6.4%). Although different pathophysiologies are present in individuals with IFG and IGT, their conversion rate to overt type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is similar.

Prospective epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that \~40% of subjects who progress to T2DM over 5 years had Normal glucose tolerance (NGT) at baseline, suggesting that a large group of NGT subjects also are at increased T2DM risk. It has previously been demonstrated that a 1-hour plasma glucose concentration \>155 mg/dl identifies a subgroup of NGT subjects with high future T2DM risk.

Further, multiple studies have demonstrated that background retinopathy, microalbuminuria, and peripheral neuropathy are present in 10-20% of prediabetic individuals. Compared with normoglycemic patients, those with prediabetes were associated with a 13-30% higher risk for composite cardiovascular disease.

Insulin resistance is a common causal feature of many of the pathophysiologic mechanisms linking macrovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. Because hyperglycemia is the major factor responsible for the development of microvascular complications, it logically follows that prevention of progression of prediabetes to overt diabetes should retard/prevent the development of the microvascular complications. From the measurement of plasma glucose, insulin, and c-peptide levels during the oral glucose tolerance test, one can derive measures of the two core defects responsible for the development of T2DM, i.e. insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction as well as the degree of dysglycemia.

The need for improvement in the identification of asymptomatic atherosclerosis is exemplified by the observation that nearly 50% of patients suffering a first myocardial infarction have either, none or only one of the standard risk factors; smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension and family history of heart disease. By combining a standard medical evaluation with the evaluation of cardiovascular biomarkers, patients at intermediate risk of vascular disease can be identified. In these patients, carotid intima media thickness and carotid plaque evaluation is offered to attempt to clarify risk.

Further associations exist between insulin resistance and other medical conditions including; fatty liver, epicardial fat, diastolic dysfunction, arrhythmia, dementia and cancer. Quantifying insulin resistance may allow advances in preventive strategies.

Following these evaluations, a discussion of the scientific literature as well as the risk, benefits and alternatives available, a personalized treatment plan is generated. Interval reassessment is carried out as part of the routine medical care of the patients in the practice.

The hypothesis of this observational study is that the characterization of the physiology and anatomy of patients at risk of developing type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease can stratify risk of developing disease and direct treatment strategies tailored to the identified physiologic defect, leading to improvements in the delay or prevention of disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PreDiabetes Insulin Resistance Type2 Diabetes NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Diastolic Dysfunction Dementia Atrial Fibrillation Cancer Atherosclerosis Carotid Plaque

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lifestyle modification in routine care of patients

Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle recommendations and non-investigational pharmacotherapy in routine care of patients

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

non-investigational drug in routine care of patients

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Diabetic Association (ADA)/American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) criteria for patients at risk for developing type 2 diabetes

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with prior treatment with medications for type 2 diabetes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pacific Coast Family Medical Group

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

John Armato

Physician, Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John P Armato, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Providence St Josephs Health

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Menke A, Casagrande S, Geiss L, Cowie CC. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012. JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26348752 (View on PubMed)

Abdul-Ghani MA, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Contributions of beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance to the pathogenesis of impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose. Diabetes Care. 2006 May;29(5):1130-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.2951130.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16644654 (View on PubMed)

Abdul-Ghani MA, Jenkinson CP, Richardson DK, Tripathy D, DeFronzo RA. Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: results from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study. Diabetes. 2006 May;55(5):1430-5. doi: 10.2337/db05-1200.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16644701 (View on PubMed)

Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The prevalence of retinopathy in impaired glucose tolerance and recent-onset diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabet Med. 2007 Feb;24(2):137-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02043.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17257275 (View on PubMed)

DREAM Trial Investigators; Dagenais GR, Gerstein HC, Holman R, Budaj A, Escalante A, Hedner T, Keltai M, Lonn E, McFarlane S, McQueen M, Teo K, Sheridan P, Bosch J, Pogue J, Yusuf S. Effects of ramipril and rosiglitazone on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: results of the Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial. Diabetes Care. 2008 May;31(5):1007-14. doi: 10.2337/dc07-1868. Epub 2008 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18268075 (View on PubMed)

Asghar O, Petropoulos IN, Alam U, Jones W, Jeziorska M, Marshall A, Ponirakis G, Fadavi H, Boulton AJ, Tavakoli M, Malik RA. Corneal confocal microscopy detects neuropathy in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetes Care. 2014 Sep;37(9):2643-6. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0279. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24969581 (View on PubMed)

Gibbons CH, Goebel-Fabbri A. Microvascular Complications Associated With Rapid Improvements in Glycemic Control in Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Jul;17(7):48. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0880-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28526993 (View on PubMed)

Defronzo RA. Banting Lecture. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009 Apr;58(4):773-95. doi: 10.2337/db09-9028. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19336687 (View on PubMed)

Armato J, DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M, Ruby R. Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice: targeting insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction. Endocr Pract. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):342-50. doi: 10.4158/EP11194.OR.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22068250 (View on PubMed)

Huang Y, Cai X, Mai W, Li M, Hu Y. Association between prediabetes and risk of cardiovascular disease and all cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016 Nov 23;355:i5953. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5953.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27881363 (View on PubMed)

Armato JP, DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M, Ruby RJ. Successful treatment of prediabetes in clinical practice using physiological assessment (STOP DIABETES). Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Oct;6(10):781-789. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30234-1. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30224284 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017000308

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.