Trial Outcomes & Findings for CAP'Onco : Psychological and Social Consultation of Professional Accompaniment in Oncology (NCT NCT03302767)

NCT ID: NCT03302767

Last Updated: 2021-05-04

Results Overview

Standardised QLQ-C30 scoring according to EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2001). 15 dimensions are presented below. Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

29 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

At baseline and 5 months

Results posted on

2021-05-04

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Overall Study
STARTED
29
Overall Study
COMPLETED
29
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Age, Continuous
44.9 years
n=29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
n=29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants
n=29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
29 participants
n=29 Participants
Marital Status
Married
11 Participants
n=29 Participants
Marital Status
As a couple
7 Participants
n=29 Participants
Marital Status
Single
10 Participants
n=29 Participants
Marital Status
Widower
1 Participants
n=29 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
craftsman, shopkeeper, business owner
3 Participants
n=29 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
executive, intellectual profession
6 Participants
n=29 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
intermediate profession
5 Participants
n=29 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
employee
14 Participants
n=29 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
person without professional activity
1 Participants
n=29 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Public Sector
13 Participants
n=29 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Private Sector
12 Participants
n=29 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Self-employed worker
3 Participants
n=29 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Other
1 Participants
n=29 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 1 patient did not complete the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. And of the remaining 28 patients, 1 patient has missing data for the score 'Dyspnoea'. * At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. And of the remaining 28 patients : * 1 patient has missing data for the scores 'Constipation' and 'Diarrhoea' * 1 another patient has missing data for the score 'Fatigue'

Standardised QLQ-C30 scoring according to EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2001). 15 dimensions are presented below. Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Global health status/ quality of life - Baseline
61.0 scores on a scale
Interval 54.3 to 67.7
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Global health status/ quality of life - 5 months
70.8 scores on a scale
Interval 66.1 to 75.5
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Physical functioning - Baseline
82.9 scores on a scale
Interval 78.8 to 86.9
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Physical functioning - 5 months
83.2 scores on a scale
Interval 78.7 to 87.6
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Role functioning - Baseline
72.6 scores on a scale
Interval 63.6 to 81.6
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Role functioning - 5 months
78.6 scores on a scale
Interval 70.2 to 87.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Emotional functioning - Baseline
61.0 scores on a scale
Interval 51.3 to 70.7
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Emotional functioning - 5 months
67.0 scores on a scale
Interval 57.9 to 76.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Cognitive functioning - Baseline
61.3 scores on a scale
Interval 52.7 to 69.9
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Cognitive functioning - 5 months
73.2 scores on a scale
Interval 65.1 to 81.3
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Social functioning - Baseline
73.2 scores on a scale
Interval 62.9 to 83.5
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Social functioning - 5 months
82.1 scores on a scale
Interval 73.9 to 90.4
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Fatigue - Baseline
47.6 scores on a scale
Interval 40.0 to 55.2
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Fatigue - 5 months
43.6 scores on a scale
Interval 35.3 to 52.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Nausea/ vomiting - Baseline
3.6 scores on a scale
Interval 0.3 to 6.8
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Nausea/ vomiting - 5 months
3.0 scores on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 6.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Pain - Baseline
38.7 scores on a scale
Interval 29.5 to 47.8
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Pain - 5 months
33.3 scores on a scale
Interval 23.2 to 43.4
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Dyspnoea - Baseline
24.7 scores on a scale
Interval 14.0 to 35.4
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Dyspnoea - 5 months
16.7 scores on a scale
Interval 8.4 to 24.9
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Insomnia - Baseline
52.4 scores on a scale
Interval 38.1 to 66.6
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Insomnia - 5 months
41.7 scores on a scale
Interval 29.2 to 54.2
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Appetite loss - Baseline
9.5 scores on a scale
Interval 3.6 to 15.5
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Appetite loss - 5 months
6.0 scores on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 11.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Constipation - Baseline
21.4 scores on a scale
Interval 12.0 to 30.9
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Constipation - 5 months
16.0 scores on a scale
Interval 3.7 to 28.4
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Diarrhoea - Baseline
8.3 scores on a scale
Interval 1.6 to 15.0
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Diarrhoea - 5 months
3.7 scores on a scale
Interval -1.9 to 9.3
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Financial difficulties - Baseline
21.4 scores on a scale
Interval 11.3 to 31.5
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores
Financial difficulties - 5 months
15.5 scores on a scale
Interval 6.5 to 24.4

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 2 patients did not complete the Cognitive complaints questionnaire * At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the Cognitive complaints questionnaire

Cognitive complaints were evaluated by using the french Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) scale version 3 Assessed using median total score (range 0-132) and median scores of these 4 dimensions : * Perceived Cognitive Impairment (range 0-72) * Impact on quality of life (range 0-16) * Comments from others (range 0-16) * Perceived Cognitive Skills (range 0-28) Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Perceived Cognitive Impairment - Baseline
39 scores on a scale
Interval 8.0 to 69.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Perceived Cognitive Impairment - 5 months
50.5 scores on a scale
Interval 7.0 to 72.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Impact on quality of life - Baseline
8 scores on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Impact on quality of life - 5 months
14.0 scores on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 16.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Comments from others - Baseline
15 scores on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 16.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Comments from others - 5 months
16 scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 16.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Perceived Cognitive Skills - Baseline
13 scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 25.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Perceived Cognitive Skills - 5 months
17.5 scores on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 27.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Total score - Baseline
75 scores on a scale
Interval 16.0 to 125.0
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores
Total score - 5 months
96 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 127.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 1 patient did not complete the Professional recovery questionnaire * At 5 months : * 3 patients have missing data for the scores 'Work and administrative process', 'Work and physical/intellectual conditions' and 'Privacy and work' * 4 patients have missing data for the scores 'Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission', 'Emotion and work' and 'Labour relations' * 1 patient has missing data for the score 'Return to work'

Professional recovery was evaluated by using the Scale of motivation to Professional recovery. This scale was constructed for the needs of this exploratory research and has for vocation a later validation. It includes 62 questions and was assessed using median scores of these 7 dimensions : * Work and administrative process (0-100) * Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission (0-100) * Emotion and work (0-100) * Labour relations (0-100) * Work and physical/intellectual conditions (0-100) * Privacy and work (0-100) * Return to work (0-20) Higher scores represent better outcomes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Work and administrative process - Baseline
58 scores on a scale
Interval 44.0 to 73.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Work and administrative process - 5 months
61 scores on a scale
Interval 34.0 to 80.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission - Baseline
40.5 scores on a scale
Interval 13.0 to 75.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission - 5 months
50 scores on a scale
Interval 10.0 to 73.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Emotion and work - Baseline
58.5 scores on a scale
Interval 28.0 to 88.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Emotion and work - 5 months
60 scores on a scale
Interval 33.0 to 91.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Labour relations - Baseline
55 scores on a scale
Interval 11.0 to 90.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Labour relations - 5 months
59 scores on a scale
Interval 28.0 to 90.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Work and physical/intellectual conditions - Baseline
42 scores on a scale
Interval 17.0 to 88.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Work and physical/intellectual conditions - 5 months
52.5 scores on a scale
Interval 28.0 to 84.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Privacy and work - Baseline
50.5 scores on a scale
Interval 29.0 to 72.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Privacy and work - 5 months
60.5 scores on a scale
Interval 25.0 to 77.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Return to work - Baseline
10 scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 20.0
Professional Recovery Scale Scores
Return to work - 5 months
14 scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 20.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline: * 2 patients have missing data for the scores 'Emotional dimension', Behavioural dimension' and 'Sensory dimension' * 3 patients have missing data for the score 'Cognitive-mood dimension' * 3 patients finally have missing data for 'Total Score Fatigue Scale' * At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the Tiredness questionnaire

Tiredness was evaluated by using the Piper Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) revised scale Assessed using median total score (range 0-10) and median scores of these 4 tiredness dimensions : * Behavioural * Emotional * Sensory * Cognitive-mood Each dimension has range 0-10 with following interpretation: higher scores indicate greater severity of fatigue

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Emotional dimension - Baseline
5.4 scores on a scale
Interval 1.6 to 9.8
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Behavioural dimension - 5 months
4.7 scores on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 9.2
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Behavioural dimension - Baseline
5.3 scores on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 9.7
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Emotional dimension - 5 months
5.7 scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 9.8
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Sensory dimension - Baseline
4.2 scores on a scale
Interval 0.6 to 7.6
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Sensory dimension - 5 months
4.0 scores on a scale
Interval 0.8 to 7.2
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Cognitive-mood dimension - Baseline
4.8 scores on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 7.7
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Cognitive-mood dimension - 5 months
3.9 scores on a scale
Interval 0.3 to 6.3
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Total Score Fatigue Scale - Baseline
5.2 scores on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 7.8
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores
Total Score Fatigue Scale - 5 months
4.7 scores on a scale
Interval 1.5 to 6.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 2 patients did not complete the Anxio-depressive troubles questionnaire * At 5 months ,1 patient did not complete the Anxio-depressive troubles questionnaire

Anxio-depressive troubles were evaluated by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale. Assessed using median scores of these 2 dimensions : * Anxiety * Depression Each dimension has range 0-21 with following interpretation: higher scores represent worse outcomes (0-7 normal; 8-10 mild; 11-14 moderate; 15-21 severe)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Psychological and Social Consultation
n=29 Participants
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores
Anxiety score - Baseline
10.0 scores on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 19.0
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores
Anxiety score - 5 months
8 scores on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 18.0
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores
Depression score - Baseline
7.0 scores on a scale
Interval 4.0 to 18.0
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores
Depression score - 5 months
6.5 scores on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 12.0

Adverse Events

Psychological and Social Consultation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Véronique GERAT-MULLER

Institut Bergonié

Phone: 0556337839

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place