Acute Effects of Static Stretching in Warm-up

NCT ID: NCT03298789

Last Updated: 2017-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

19 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-22

Study Completion Date

2017-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study the investigators want to address acute effects of warm-up and static stretching on short-term muscular performance of football players. Static stretching exercises are often used in the first part of a training session or before a football match in order to increase sports performance and to decrease risk of injuries. Since there is a lot of scientific evidence that demonstrates static stretching can improve short-term muscle performance, the aim of researchers is to discover the size and the duration of negative effects and, additionally, whether these effects can be eliminated with activation exercises. Nineteen 14 years old football players will be included in a cross-over study design.

In the control condition the participants will perform 5 minutes of aerobic warm-up (stepping on the stair) and then 7 series of 20-seconds static stretching of quadriceps femoris, hamstrings, hip adductors and triceps surae.

Maximal power and jump height of the countermovement jump will be tested in between every series. Thus, parameters of countermovement jump will be monitored at the beginning, after warm-up, after each series of static stretching, 7.5 minutes after 7th static stretching series and 15 minutes after 7th static stretching series.

Parameters of dynamometry (relative maximal torque \[Nm/kgBM\] and rate of torque developement \[Nm/s/kgBM\] will be monitored at the beginning, after warm up, 7.5 minutes after last series of static stretching and 15 minutes after last series of static stretching.

Maximal range of motion will be monitored at the beginning, after warm up, during every series of static stretching, after last series of static stretching, 7.5 minutes after last series of static stretching and 15 minutes after last series of static stretching.

In the second condition (experimental) all the tasks are the same, the only difference is that the subjects must perform post-activation potentiation exercises after last series of static stretching.

We hypothesize that muscular performance will be impaired to a statistically significant level after 7th series of static stretching. Second hypothesis is that negative effects will not last longer than 15 minutes and the last hypothesis is that static stretching induced negative effects can be nullified with activation exercises.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stretching exercises are often used in warm-up to increase footballer's performance and to decrease risk of injury. The main aim of these exercises is to increase maximal active range of motion. Different types of stretching exercises are being used: ballistic, dynamic, static, eccentric flexibility training and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. All of them are usually used in football training sessions in order to increase short-term range of motion and to decrease associated risk of injuries. Simic, Sarabon and Markovic (2013) in their meta-analysis reported that static stretching can have negative acute effects, which is not in line with general thinking, that static stretching in warm-up can have positive effects on sports performance.

Post-activation potentiation is a phenomenon, which is induced by loading the muscle to increase the recruitment of motor units. Since static stretching can have negative effects on muscle performance (maximal strength, power) the researchers hypothesize, that the effects can be eliminated with this type of activation exercises.

In this study the researchers want to measure acute effects of warm-up and static stretching on maximal range of motion, maximal torque and maximal rate of torque of adductors (dynamometer) and maximal power and height of countermovement jump (force plate) of football players. Since there is many scientific evidence that shows that static stretching can improve short-term muscle performance, our aim is to discover the size and the duration of negative effects and if they can be eliminated with post-activation potentiation exercises. In the cross-over study design 19 football players of age 14 will be included.

In the first condition (control) the participants will perform 5 minutes of aerobic warm-up (stepping on the stair) and then 7 series of 20-seconds bilateral static stretching of hamstrings, adductors and triceps surae (with knee extended). Quadriceps femoris will be stretched unilaterally, each muscle 20 seconds. Summary of all stretches in one series is 80 seconds. Maximal range of motion of hip abduction and hip flexion (seat and reach test) and dorsal flexion will be measured at the beginning, after warm up, during each series of static stretching, after last series of static stretching, 7.5 minutes after last series of static stretching and 15 minutes after last series of static stretching.

Maximal power \[W/kg\] and height \[m\] of the countermovement jump will be monitored with force plate at the beginning, after warm up, after each series of static stretching, 7.5 minutes after last series of static stretching and 15 minutes after last series of static stretching.

On dynamometer will be conducted 2 maximal explosive voluntary contractions of adductors muscles. Relative maximal torque \[Nm/kgBM\] and rate of torque developement \[Nm/s/kgBM\] will be measured at the beginning, after warm up, after last series of static stretching, 7.5 minutes after last series of static stretching and 15 minutes after last series of static stretching.

In the second condition (experimental) all the tasks are the same, the only difference is that the subjects must conduct activation exercises after last series of static stretching.

Activation exercises are consisted of 2 series of 4 exercises. The first series (slow series) starts with 8 lifts onto toes (dorsal flexion) with knees extended, than continues with 8 deep squats and 8 hip thrust and then terminates with four 4-seconds lasting maximal voluntary contraction of adductors with knees extended and with soft ball between the ankles. The second series (explosive) commences with 8 maximal vertical jumps conducted just with ankles, and then continues with 8 maximal countermovement jumps and 8 explosive hip thrusts. It finishes with 8 maximal explosive and 2 seconds lasting voluntary contractions of hip adductors with knees extended and with soft ball between the ankles.

The researchers hypothesize that muscular performance (maximal power and height of the countermovement jump, maximal torque and rate of torque developement of adductors muscles) will be impaired after 7 series of static stretching. Second hypothesis is that negative effects will not last longer than 15 minutes and the last hypothesis is that static stretching induced negative effects can be eliminated with sets of activation exercises.

Statistical analysis will be performed in SPSS (SPSS Statistics 22, IBM, New York). T-test, 1-way and 2-way repeated measures ANOVA will be used to confirm the differences between average values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Only Healthy Participants Are Included in the Study

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

19 subjects will be devided into two groups. The first group will conduct the control condition on Saturday and the second group will conduct the experimental condition on Sunday. One week later, the subjects will undergo the second visit, each group of subjects performing the opposite condition.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental condition

7 series of static stretching will be conducted in the experimental condition. Activation exercises will be performed after 7th series of static stretching.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Activation exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

Two series of 4 activation exercise will be included in the intervention.

7 series of static stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

7 series of 4 20 seconds static stretches will be conducted.

Control

7 series of static stretching will be conducted in the control condition.

Group Type OTHER

7 series of static stretching

Intervention Type OTHER

7 series of 4 20 seconds static stretches will be conducted.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Activation exercise

Two series of 4 activation exercise will be included in the intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

7 series of static stretching

7 series of 4 20 seconds static stretches will be conducted.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* football players, man

Exclusion Criteria

* injuries, last 12 months
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

S2P, Science to Practice, Ltd.

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Motus Melior, Ltd.

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Primorska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nejc Sarabon

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Sc.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nejc Sarabon, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Primorska, Faculty of Health Studies, Izola, Slovenia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Primorska

Izola, Polje 42, Slovenia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Slovenia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UP-FVZ-StretchingEffects

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id