Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT03297593

Last Updated: 2025-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-13

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors that target PD-1 and CTLA-4 have shown activity in mRCC. However, the optimal schedule of the combination therapy has yet to be defined.

The objective of the trial is to determine the efficacy of combination immunotherapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The expansion phase shall address the role of ipilimumab in case of clinically insignificant progression.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite the encouraging results of recent trials, only a minority of patients shows significant response to single agent immunotherapy with nivolumab (Overall response rate (ORR) around 20%). Therefore, further investigations are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with mRCC. Recent analyses of phase I trials in mRCC and also in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients as well as more advanced studies in melanoma patients have provided evidence that combination of immunotherapies can improve response rates and response duration.

Cancer immunotherapy rests on the premise that tumors can be recognized as foreign rather than as self and can be effectively attacked by an activated immune system. An effective immune response in this setting is thought to rely on immune surveillance of tumor antigens expressed on cancer cells that ultimately results in an adaptive immune response and cancer cell death. Meanwhile, tumor progression may depend upon acquisition of traits that allow cancer cells to evade immunosurveillance and escape effective innate and adaptive immune responses. Current immunotherapy efforts attempt to break the apparent tolerance of the immune system to tumor cells and antigens by either introducing cancer antigens by therapeutic vaccination or by modulating regulatory checkpoints of the immune system.

Dysfunctional T cells in cancer show an upregulation of inhibitory receptors (T cell exhaustion). Combined blockade of inhibitory receptors including CTLA-4 and PD-1 are considered to act synergistically. Indeed, early trials in mRCC showed improved response rates and combinations have also demonstrated to be prolonging progression-free survival in melanoma. While CTLA-4 is mainly involved in transmitting negative signals in T cells during priming in the lymph node, PD-1 is thought to mainly inhibit T cell cytotoxicity within the tumor by engagement of ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, which are upregulated by tumor cells and inflammatory cells within the tumor microenvironment as shield against the immune attack. It is therefore reasonable to combine PD-1 blockade with CTLA-4 blockade and this has been tested with an intriguing doubling of ORR in a phase I trial in patients with mRCC. An important aspect of any combination therapy is the question of additional/ excessive toxicity. In that trial the combination of nivolumab 3mg/kg/q3w (cont.) and ipilimumab 1mg/kg/q3w (4 times) proved to be safe, efficacious and feasible (much better safety profile in patients with mRCC compared to patients in melanoma trials). 78% of patients had any AE, but only 28% a grade 3-4 AE event. While diarrhea was quite common, only 4.8% had grade 3-4 diarrhea. Other treatment related immune-mediated AEs, especially endocrinopathy, pneumonitis, skin disorders were recorded at lower grades than 3. No deaths were reported for this combination. The overall response rate was 43% with durable responses of 78% in patients that had an initial response (durable responses).

Moreover, recent variations of dosing schedules and strengths of the nivolumab-ipilimumab combinations have shown improvement of toxicity rates with no loss of efficacy. For example, ipilimumab every 6 weeks at 1mg/kg was shown to be well tolerated in patients with non-small cell lung cancer when combined with nivolumab.

Nivolumab has proven efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile as a 2nd line therapy in mRCC. It is therefore destined to become the standard therapy after a first line TKI therapy. However, only a minority of patients shows clear responses leaving plenty of room for improvement. The addition of a further agent including blockade of CTLA-4 that acts synergistically could improve the response rate and also extend the progression-free and overall survival in patients with mRCC.

The addition of ipilimumab to nivolumab in order to increase response rates and induce more often durable remissions in patients is a reasonable next step and is currently tested in several randomized trials. However, at this point it is unclear which subgroup benefits most from the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockade and the optimal regimen/schedule remains unknown. To this end, this trial will test a combination of ipilimumab with nivolumab at an alternate schedule and a subsequent adaptation of the treatment regimen to the individual response with the aim to increase efficacy while reducing toxicity in mRCC patients. Ipilimumab is often used only in the first weeks of antineoplastic treatment for initial immune priming, allowing the presumption that it could be stopped after an initial priming phase. A phase I dose finding study is not needed, as experience with this dose and even higher doses have been reported and data are on file at Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS). In addition, sequential biopsies and biomarker studies shall identify patients that benefit the most of a combination immunotherapy. In this trial, it was decided to have a nivolumab lead-in phase to be able to determine whether any acute side effect is nivolumab or ipilimumab related.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Prospective single-stage single-arm multicenter phase II trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

nivolumab and ipilimumab

Patients start treatment with nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks during the first 20 weeks, 480 mg every 4 weeks thereafter).

After 2 weeks, ipilimumab (1mg/kg every 6 weeks) will be introduced. As soon as a radiographic complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) is observed, ipilimumab has to be stopped and only the single-agent treatment with nivolumab is continued. Once ipilumimab has been stopped because of a response, it will not be re-started later on.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

nivolumab

Intervention Type DRUG

240 mg every 2 weeks during the first 20 weeks, 480 mg every 4 weeks thereafter

ipilimumab

Intervention Type DRUG

After 2 weeks 1mg/kg every 6 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

nivolumab

240 mg every 2 weeks during the first 20 weeks, 480 mg every 4 weeks thereafter

Intervention Type DRUG

ipilimumab

After 2 weeks 1mg/kg every 6 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Opdivo Yervoy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Written informed consent according to Swiss law and ICH/GCP regulations before registration and prior to any trial specific procedures
* Histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced and/or metastatic clear cell RCC not amenable to surgery or definitive radiotherapy, and requiring systemic therapy
* Patient able and willing to provide serial biopsies and blood drawings (initial, at 14 weeks (except for patient in the expansion cohort), and at progression).
* Measurable disease
* In case of second line patients, the previous therapy must be stopped at least 2 weeks prior to registration
* Age ≥ 18 years
* WHO performance status of 0-1
* Bone marrow function: neutrophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
* Hepatic function: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN (except for patients with Gilbert's disease ≤ 3.0 x ULN), AST, ALT and AP ≤ 2.5 x ULN (≤ 5 x ULN if significant hepatic metastasis is suspected to be the cause for enzyme elevation)
* Renal function: eGFR \> 20 mL/min/1.732
* Cardiac function: NYHA ≤ 2. In case of cardiac insufficiency NYHA 1 or 2, Left ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≥ 35% as determined by echocardiography (ECHO) or multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan
* Women with child-bearing potential are using effective contraception are not pregnant or lactating and agree not to become pregnant during trial treatment and during 5 months thereafter. A negative pregnancy test before inclusion into the trial is required for all women with child-bearing potential.
* Men agree not to father a child during trial treatment and during 5 months thereafter

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled CNS metastases. Patients with asymptomatic CNS metastases (at least 2 weeks after radiotherapy or surgery and steroids with prednisone equivalent of 10 mg or lower) are eligible
* History of hematologic or primary solid tumor malignancy, unless in remission for at least 3 years from registration with the exception of pT1-2 prostate cancer Gleason score \< 6, adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ, or localized non-melanoma skin cancer.
* More than one previous line of systemic therapy for mRCC
* Prior immunotherapy.
* Concurrent or recent (within 30 days of registration) treatment with any other experimental drug
* Concomitant use of other anti-cancer drugs or radiotherapy except for local pain control (radiotherapy of target lesion not allowed)
* Immunosuppressive medications (such as but not limited to: methotrexate, azathioprine, and TNF-α blockers) within 30 days before registration

Exception:

* systemic corticosteroids at doses not exceeding 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent
* immunosuppressive medications for patients with contrast allergies
* inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids
* Live attenuated vaccination within 30 days prior to registration and for 30 days after last dose of any of the trial drugs. Inactivated viruses, such as those in the influenza vaccine, are permitted
* History of or active auto-immune disease with the exception of diabetes mellitus type II
* Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or active chronic Hepatitis C or Hepatitis B Virus infection or any uncontrolled active systemic infection requiring intravenous (iv) antimicrobial treatment
* Known hypersensitivity to trial drug(s) or to any component of the trial drug(s)
* Any other serious underlying medical, psychiatric, psychological, familial or geographical condition, which in the judgment of the investigator may interfere with the planned staging, treatment and follow-up, affect patient compliance or place the patient at high risk from treatment-related complications.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Swiss Cancer Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frank Stenner, Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Universitätsspital Basel

Heinz Läubli, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Universitätsspital Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kantonsspital Aarau

Aarau, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Baden

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

Universitätsspital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Inselspital Bern

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz

Bruderholz, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Graubünden

Chur, , Switzerland

Site Status

Spital Thurgau

Frauenfeld, , Switzerland

Site Status

HFR - Hôpital cantonal

Fribourg, , Switzerland

Site Status

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Centre hospitalier universitaire vaudois - CHUV

Lausanne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Luzerner Kantonsspital

Lucerne, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital St. Gallen

Sankt Gallen, , Switzerland

Site Status

Kantonsspital Winterthur

Winterthur, , Switzerland

Site Status

UniversitätsSpital Zürich

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SAKK 07/17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.