The Feasibility, Effects and Costs of the 'Stay Active at Home Programme'
NCT ID: NCT03293303
Last Updated: 2020-10-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
265 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-06
2019-08-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
INTERVENTION: 'Stay Active at Home' is not an additional, (classical) exercise programme; physical activity is integrated in usual home care. Healthcare professionals learn to engage older adults in daily life in order to improve their physical activity and reduce their sedentary time. For example, washing the upper body and face independently; changing the pillowcase, while professional changes bedcover; and motivating clients to join a dancing class at the community centre.
AIM and DESIGN: The aim of this cluster randomised controlled trial is to provide evidence about the (cost-) effectiveness of 'Stay Active at Home' prior to dissemination and implementation of the programme. Alongside the trial an extensive process evaluation will be conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Levels of Daily Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Maastricht University's Undergraduate First Year Students
NCT03513341
Staying Healthy Through Education and Prevention Study
NCT00817193
Physical Activity on Prescription and Enhanced Individual Support by Physiotherapist
NCT04350983
Unravelling Effectiveness of a Nurse-led Behavior Change Intervention to Enhance Physical Activity in Patients
NCT02725203
Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior: Screening and Intervention in Ambulatory Primary Care
NCT06678906
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
To prevent these negative consequences the behaviour of healthcare professionals has to change from 'doing things for older adults' to 'engaging older adults' in daily life in order to improve physical activity among older adults by reducing their sedentary time. This innovative care philosophy is also known as Function Focused Care (FFC), restorative care or reablement. These terms can be used interchangeably, but we will refer to it as FFC throughout this project proposal. In the US the research group of Resnick and colleagues conducted various studies in inpatient and residential care facilities. They have shown that FFC succeeds in increasing physical activity. Furthermore, FFC has shown to result in physical (e.g. daily functioning, muscle strength, balance) and psychological benefits (e.g. mood, behavioural symptoms) and reduces the risk for adverse outcomes (e.g. falls, delirium). Resnick et al. have little experience in homecare settings, but there is an emerging body of evidence, especially in Norway, New Zealand and Australia, that FFC has also potential for community-based care showing beneficial effects with regard to daily functioning, self-perceived activity performance and satisfaction, health-related quality of life, healthcare utilisation/costs, and even mortality. Experiences and results of FFC in Dutch community-dwelling older adults are lacking.
Promising programmes in one particular care setting are not automatically replicable in other settings due to cultural or organisational differences. Consequently, available programmes need to be adapted to the local circumstances before they can be successfully implemented in another setting. However, making changes requires careful planning and execution to prevent a loss of effectiveness by affecting the original programme's theory or removing core components of the programme. Therefore, the investigators have followed so far the first two phases of the framework of the Medical Research Council in preparing the use of FFC in Dutch community-dwelling older adults receiving homecare services:
* Phase I (2013- first half of 2016): The investigators systematically adapted in co-creation with international FFC experts and a Dutch panel of relevant stakeholders the initial FFC philosophy and conducted a pilot study. Throughout the adaptation process healthcare professionals, policy makers, managers and scientists were involved at various times to ensure that all interests are considered and respected. Although not the primary target population (i.e. homecare professionals), the project idea was also intensively discussed with a panel of older adults. The final result of this adaptation process was the 'Stay Active at Home' programme (in Dutch: 'Blijf Actief Thuis'). During the pilot, data about its feasibility was collected from healthcare professionals and older adults.
* Phase II (second half of 2016 - first half of 2017): The investigators conducted a second pilot study, a so-called 'early trial' prior to the currently proposed trial, as part of the ZonMw project BASIC CARE REVISITED (ZonMw #520002003). This early trial provided relevant information regarding: a) the implementation of specific intervention components; b) key components of the chosen methodology (e.g. outcome measures); c) rates of recruitment and retention; and d) the expected effect size. This information is highly relevant with regard to finalising the intervention and designing a subsequent main trial.
In conclusion, 'Stay Active at Home' is systematically developed for the Dutch homecare setting based on international evidence in close collaboration with Dutch stakeholders (i.e. older adults, healthcare professionals, policy makers and managers). The initial feasibility of the programme and the proposed study design are evaluated in two pilot studies prior to the grant period. In order to determine the (cost-) effectiveness of 'Stay Active at Home' prior to dissemination and implementation of the programme in the Dutch homecare setting this cluster randomised controlled trial has to be conducted. Alongside the trial an extensive process evaluation will be conducted.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Stay Active at Home
One group of homecare professionals receives a training programme. In this training they learn to motivate their clients to be more active in daily and physical activities.
Stay Active at Home
Stay Active at Home' aims to change the behaviour of community nurses and domestic support workers by offering them an intensive training programme. Subsequently, professionals are expected to deliver goal-oriented, holistic and person-centred services focusing on supporting older adults to maintain, gain or restore their competences to engage in physical and daily activities so that they can manage their everyday life as independently as possible.
Usual care
Second group of homecare professionals will get no training and their clients will receive usual homecare.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Stay Active at Home
Stay Active at Home' aims to change the behaviour of community nurses and domestic support workers by offering them an intensive training programme. Subsequently, professionals are expected to deliver goal-oriented, holistic and person-centred services focusing on supporting older adults to maintain, gain or restore their competences to engage in physical and daily activities so that they can manage their everyday life as independently as possible.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥65 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Serious cognitive or psychological problems
* Not able to communicate in Dutch
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gertrudis IJ Kempen, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Maastricht University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MeanderGroep Zuid-Limburg
Landgraaf, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Metzelthin SF, Rooijackers TH, Zijlstra GAR, van Rossum E, Veenstra MY, Koster A, Evers SMAA, van Breukelen GJP, Kempen GIJM. Effects, costs and feasibility of the 'Stay Active at Home' Reablement training programme for home care professionals: study protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Nov 13;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0968-z.
Metzelthin SF, Zijlstra GA, van Rossum E, de Man-van Ginkel JM, Resnick B, Lewin G, Parsons M, Kempen GI. 'Doing with ...' rather than 'doing for ...' older adults: rationale and content of the 'Stay Active at Home' programme. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Nov;31(11):1419-1430. doi: 10.1177/0269215517698733. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
Rooijackers TH, Metzelthin SF, van Rossum E, Kempen GIJM, Evers SMAA, Gabrio A, Zijlstra GAR. Economic Evaluation of a Reablement Training Program for Homecare Staff Targeting Sedentary Behavior in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Compared to Usual Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Dec 22;16:2095-2109. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S341221. eCollection 2021.
Rooijackers TH, Zijlstra GAR, van Rossum E, Vogel RGM, Veenstra MY, Kempen GIJM, Metzelthin SF. Process evaluation of a reablement training program for homecare staff to encourage independence in community-dwelling older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01936-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZonMw no. 50-53120-98-014
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.