Trial Outcomes & Findings for Effects of rTMS on Brain Activation in Aphasia (NCT NCT03292471)
NCT ID: NCT03292471
Last Updated: 2022-12-20
Results Overview
The Philadelphia Naming Test is a performance-based measure commonly used to assess naming (word production) ability among adults with aphasia. The minimum raw score is 0 and the maximum is 175 (higher scores reflect more accurate naming/better naming ability).
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
Pre- to post treatment (an average of 3 weeks), and at 2 month follow-up
2022-12-20
Participant Flow
Prior to group assignment, participants completed the Comprehensive Aphasia Test to determine aphasia severity, as groups were pseudorandomized on this basis (groups were balanced for average aphasia severity). In addition, participants completed an MRI screener and medical records were reviewed to screen for the presence of contraindications to MRI and/or rTMS.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Inhibitory Only
Inhibitory 1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses (20 minutes) 5 days per week across 2 weeks (10 sessions total).
|
Excitatory Primed
The inhibitory sequence (1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses) was preceded for each session by priming stimulation which consisted of intermittent 6-Hz rTMS applied in 5 second trains with 25 second intervals between trains for a total 600 pulses (10 minutes).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
8
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Effects of rTMS on Brain Activation in Aphasia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Inhibitory Only
n=8 Participants
Inhibitory 1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses (20 minutes) 5 days per week across 2 weeks (10 sessions total).
|
Excitatory Primed
n=8 Participants
The inhibitory sequence (1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses) was preceded for each session by priming stimulation which will consist of intermittent 6-Hz rTMS applied in 5 second trains with 25 second intervals between trains for a total 600 pulses (10 minutes).
|
Total
n=16 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Aphasia Severity (Comprehensive Aphasia Severity Mean Modality T-Score)
|
53.56 T-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.25 • n=5 Participants
|
53.86 T-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.29 • n=7 Participants
|
53.64 T-Score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.67 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- to post treatment (an average of 3 weeks), and at 2 month follow-upPopulation: 5 participants in each group were able to return for 2-month follow up testing
The Philadelphia Naming Test is a performance-based measure commonly used to assess naming (word production) ability among adults with aphasia. The minimum raw score is 0 and the maximum is 175 (higher scores reflect more accurate naming/better naming ability).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Inhibitory Only
n=8 Participants
Inhibitory 1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses (20 minutes) 5 days per week across 2 weeks (10 sessions total).
|
Excitatory Primed
n=8 Participants
The inhibitory sequence (1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses) was preceded for each session by priming stimulation which will consist of intermittent 6-Hz rTMS applied in 5 second trains with 25 second intervals between trains for a total 600 pulses (10 minutes).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Performance
Pre-treatment
|
122.125 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.18
|
130.875 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.86
|
|
Change in Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Performance
Post-treatment
|
132.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.65
|
142.125 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.71
|
|
Change in Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) Performance
Follow-up
|
115.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.85
|
133.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.84
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Pre- to post treatment (an average of 3 weeks), and at 2 month follow-upPopulation: 5 participants in each group were able to return for follow-up testing
The Comprehensive Aphasia Test is a performance-based measure of language processing across multiple language domains commonly used to assess language-processing ability among adults with aphasia. CAT mean modality T-Score (average of all language subscale T-scores of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test) is a measure of overall aphasia severity. A T-score of 50 reflects mean performance for the CAT normative sample of individuals with aphasia, with a standard deviation of 10 (higher scores reflect better performance/less severe aphasia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Inhibitory Only
n=8 Participants
Inhibitory 1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses (20 minutes) 5 days per week across 2 weeks (10 sessions total).
|
Excitatory Primed
n=8 Participants
The inhibitory sequence (1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses) was preceded for each session by priming stimulation which will consist of intermittent 6-Hz rTMS applied in 5 second trains with 25 second intervals between trains for a total 600 pulses (10 minutes).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) Performance
Post-treatment
|
54.54 T-Score
Standard Deviation 5.45
|
55.71 T-Score
Standard Deviation 4.59
|
|
Change in Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) Performance
Pre-treatment
|
53.56 T-Score
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
53.875 T-Score
Standard Deviation 4.29
|
|
Change in Comprehensive Aphasia Test (CAT) Performance
Follow-up
|
52.5 T-Score
Standard Deviation 4.04
|
56.7 T-Score
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
Adverse Events
Inhibitory Only
Excitatory Primed
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Inhibitory Only
n=8 participants at risk
Inhibitory 1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses (20 minutes) 5 days per week across 2 weeks (10 sessions total).
|
Excitatory Primed
n=8 participants at risk
The inhibitory sequence (1Hz rTMS was applied continuously for 1200 pulses) was preceded for each session by priming stimulation which consisted of intermittent 6-Hz rTMS applied in 5 second trains with 25 second intervals between trains for a total 600 pulses (10 minutes).
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Mild Headache
|
0.00%
0/8 • Approximately 3 months
An adverse event reporting form was completed at each assessment and treatment visit
|
12.5%
1/8 • Number of events 3 • Approximately 3 months
An adverse event reporting form was completed at each assessment and treatment visit
|
Additional Information
Dr. Michelle Gravier
VA Pittsburgh/California State University, East Bay
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place