Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tolerability of Suprascapular and Median Nerve Blocks for the Treatment of Shoulder-hand Syndrome (NCT NCT03291197)
NCT ID: NCT03291197
Last Updated: 2019-09-30
Results Overview
To evaluate the tolerability of ultrasound-guided suprascapular and median nerve blocks in stroke patients with SHS as determined using the Budapest criteria. Since tolerability is a subjective measure, it will be defined by a composite outcome including: A) Pain score prior to, during, and immediately following the procedure as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS); B) the rate of serious adverse events associated with this procedure; and C) the level of patient acceptance and satisfaction as determined by a validated post-procedure survey.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
5 participants
12 months
2019-09-30
Participant Flow
Recruitment period was from September 2017 to 2018. This was a 12 month period in which patient with shoulder and hand pain following stroke were recruited.
All participants were recruited to for suprascapular and median nerve blocks once a diagnosis of shoulder-hand-syndrome was made using the Budapest criteria
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Open Label Treatment
These patients received suprascapular and median nerve blocks for shoulder hand syndrome. Investigators assessed the tolerability of his procedure using pre-defined criteria (outlined elsewhere).
Suprascapular and median nerve blocks: Ultrasound guided injection of the median and suprascapular nerve of the affected side.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Open Label Treatment
n=5 Participants
These patients will receive suprascapular and median nerve blocks for shoulder hand syndrome. Investigators will assess the tolerability of his procedure using pre-defined criteria (outlined elsewhere).
Suprascapular and median nerve blocks: Ultrasound guided injection of the median and suprascapular nerve of the affected side.
Outcome measure were recorded for each participant before, immediately after, and 2 weeks post intervention.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Right Hand Dominant
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Mini Mental Status Exam
|
26.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Stroke Location
Right middle cerebral artery
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Stroke Location
Right posterior limb of internal capsule
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Stroke Location
Left pons
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time interval, days
|
12.8 Days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: All participants tolerated the intervention
To evaluate the tolerability of ultrasound-guided suprascapular and median nerve blocks in stroke patients with SHS as determined using the Budapest criteria. Since tolerability is a subjective measure, it will be defined by a composite outcome including: A) Pain score prior to, during, and immediately following the procedure as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS); B) the rate of serious adverse events associated with this procedure; and C) the level of patient acceptance and satisfaction as determined by a validated post-procedure survey.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolerability
n=5 Participants
Composite score of: a) change in VAS by \> 18mm; b) rate of serious adverse events; c) level of patient satisfaction
|
1 Hour VAS
VAS measured within 1 hour after intervetion
|
2 Weeks VAS
VAS measured 2 weeks post intervention
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Demonstrating Tolerability of Suprascapular and Median Nerve Blocks
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: measured at baseline, within 1 hour after, and 2 weeks post interventionPain scale used to address a difference following intervention. Pain is measured on a horizontal line from 0 to 100mm, with 0 being no pain and 100 being the worst imaginable pain. Participants place a vertical mark on the line indicating their pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolerability
n=5 Participants
Composite score of: a) change in VAS by \> 18mm; b) rate of serious adverse events; c) level of patient satisfaction
|
1 Hour VAS
n=5 Participants
VAS measured within 1 hour after intervetion
|
2 Weeks VAS
n=5 Participants
VAS measured 2 weeks post intervention
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Shoulder
|
75 score on a scale
Interval 66.5 to 90.5
|
17 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 29.5
|
22 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 63.0
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Hand
|
36 score on a scale
Interval 24.5 to 80.5
|
16 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 32.5
|
28 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 57.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsInvestigators will assess the reproducibility of the Budapest clinical criteria for newly suspected cases of SHS. This will be achieved by determining the level of inter-rater agreement between a resident and a staff physician working in stroke rehabilitation. Investigators will thus determine if there is variability in the clinical diagnosis among physicians with different levels of expertise.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Tolerability
n=5 Participants
Composite score of: a) change in VAS by \> 18mm; b) rate of serious adverse events; c) level of patient satisfaction
|
1 Hour VAS
VAS measured within 1 hour after intervetion
|
2 Weeks VAS
VAS measured 2 weeks post intervention
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Inter-rater Agreement of Budapest Criteria
|
0.75 Intraclass correlation coefficient
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Tolerability
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Marc Monsour
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Ottawa Resident
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place