RCT of QPS vs General Information Sheet

NCT ID: NCT03287492

Last Updated: 2026-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

207 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-25

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial studies how well information materials work in helping communication between physicians and participants with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and their caregivers. Approaches that encourage participants to actively participate and ask appropriate questions during their visit may be important to enhance their understanding of their illness and empower them to make important decisions regarding their medical care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare patients' perception of helpfulness in communicating with their physicians between a question prompt sheet (QPS) and a general information sheet (GIS).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare caregivers' perception of helpfulness in communicating with their physicians between the QPS and the GIS.

II. To examine the level of patients' and caregivers' overall satisfaction with the consultation with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

III. To examine physicians' views about the information material and overall satisfaction with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

IV. To explore how the use of QPS affects the average speaking time of patient or physician during the consultation visit.

V. To establish demographic and clinical predictors of patients' perception of helpfulness of a QPS.

VI. To examine the overall patients' preference between the QPS and GIS in an open label phase.

VII. To compare the change in patient anxiety state with the use of the QPS versus the GIS.

VIII. To explore the factors underlying patients' preferences for the QPS or GIS.

OUTLINE: Participants are randomized into 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Participants receive QPS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

GROUP II: Participants receive GIS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advanced Malignant Neoplasm Caregiver Physician

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I (QPS)

Participants receive QPS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Informational Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive QPS

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Group II (GIS)

Participants receive GIS and answer questions from physician. At follow up visit, participants receive both QPS and GIS.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Informational Intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Receive GIS

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Informational Intervention

Receive QPS

Intervention Type OTHER

Informational Intervention

Receive GIS

Intervention Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* (Patient participation) First outpatient consultation visit with a palliative care specialist
* (Patient participation) Normal cognitive status, defined as a normal state of arousal and an absence of obvious clinical findings of confusion, memory deficits or concentration deficits, as determined by the patient's physician
* (Patient participation) Ability to read and communicate in English
* (Patient participation) Diagnosis of advanced cancer
* (Patient participation) Signed written informed consent form
* (Caregiver participation) accompanied the patient to the clinic visit
* (Caregiver participation) is identified by the patient as someone who is actively involved in their overall care
* (Caregiver participation) is able to read and communicate in English
* (Caregiver participation) is willing to participate in the study and able to complete the questionnaires
* (Physician participation) a palliative medicine specialist
* (Physician participation) seeing the patient in consultation on the day of the study
* (Physician participation) willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph A Arthur

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Arthur J, Pawate V, Lu Z, Yennurajalingam S, Azhar A, Reddy A, Epner D, Hui D, Tanco K, Delgado Guay MO, Vidal M, Chen M, Bruera E. Helpfulness of Question Prompt Sheet for Patient-Physician Communication Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2311189. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11189.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37129892 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.mdanderson.org

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2018-01052

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017-0028

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2017-0028

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.