Proactive Palliative Care Intervention in a Surgical ICU: Influence on Family Satisfaction and Patient Distress

NCT ID: NCT03287323

Last Updated: 2017-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-19

Study Completion Date

2021-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients will be identified according to pre-defined trigger criteria for a palliative intervention. One hundred patients of a control group will receive standard intensive care treatment (Usual Care Group). Patients' biopsychosocial problem-related distress will be evaluated and family satisfaction with intensive care will be measured with standardized questionnaires. In the subsequent intervention part of the study one hundred patients will additionally be offered a palliative care treatment (Proactive Care Group) and patients' biopsychosocial problem-related distress as well as family satisfaction will also be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The project consists of different consecutive parts:

1. Trigger criteria: Trigger criteria for patients with unmet palliative care needs in an intensive care unit have been specified prior to start of the clinical study by survey of staff of the surgical intensive care unit (intensivists and nursing staff): Trigger criteria include a) advanced cancer, b) multi-organ failure, c) severe cognitive impairment or dementia
2. Clinical study: Proactive palliative care intervention vs. standard care for intensive care patients. Initially patients fulfilling the defined trigger criteria will be enrolled in the standard care group (Group 1). In the intervention part of the study, enrolled patients will be offered a set of different palliative care interventions in addition to standard intensive care (Group 2). In both groups, family satisfaction will be evaluated with the FS-ICU-24 (Family Satisfaction Intensive Care) questionnaire after discharge of the patients from the ICU. 8 weeks (60 days +/- 7 days) after inclusion in the study, patients' biopsychosocial distress will be assessed with standardized patient questionnaires (NCCN Distress thermometer, PHQ-2 Patient Health Questionnaire). One year after inclusion in the study, patients' functional status will be evaluated in a telephone interview using the Barthel Index. Planned duration of clinical part of the study: 3 years, thereof

1. Patient-related:

Duration of palliative care intervention: approx. 60 mins for each patient contact. The number of interventions depends on the duration of ICU stay per patient. Follow-up per patient until 1 year after enrolment.
2. Study-related:

The clinical study starts with the enrollment of the first ICU patient. Data will be collected between the admission of the patient in the ICU until discharge from ICU and hospital discharge, respectively. Follow-up visits will be performed 8 weeks and 1 year after enrolment. Patients will be recruited over an estimated period of approx. 3 years, assuming that 1-2 patients per week can be included. Follow-up data will be collected up to 1 year after last patient in.
3. Termination of study including data analysis and evaluation, and publication of the study results: approx. 1 year

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Palliative Care

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Prospective before-and after interventional study including 100 patients who receive usual intensive care followed by an interventional part with 100 patients who receive additional palliative care consultations
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual Care Group

One hundred patients of a control group will receive standard intensive care treatment (Usual Care Group).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Proactive Palliative Care

One hundred patients will additionally be offered a palliative care Intervention (Proactive Palliative Care Group).

Group Type OTHER

Proactive Palliative Care

Intervention Type OTHER

In the intervention part of the study, enrolled patients will be offered a set of different palliative care interventions, including symptom management, advance care planning, palliative physiotherapy, social and spiritual support, communication with patients and caregivers, in addition to standard intensive care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Proactive Palliative Care

In the intervention part of the study, enrolled patients will be offered a set of different palliative care interventions, including symptom management, advance care planning, palliative physiotherapy, social and spiritual support, communication with patients and caregivers, in addition to standard intensive care.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* need for intensive care for more than 3 days and at least one of the following trigger criteria:

1. known advanced cancer
2. severe cognitive impairment or dementia
3. multi-organ failure

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who already receive palliative care
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann, M.D.

Anaesthesiologist, Head of Clinical Trial Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+49 (0) 6131 17 ext. 6751

Marion Ferner, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+49 (0) 6131 17 ext. 6751

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Rita Laufenberg-Feldmann, M.D.

Role: primary

+49 (0) 6131 17 ext. 6751

Marion Ferner, M.D.

Role: backup

+49 (0) 6131 17 ext. 6751

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hua M, Wunsch H. Integrating palliative care in the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Dec;20(6):673-80. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000149.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25233330 (View on PubMed)

Heyland DK, Tranmer JE; Kingston General Hospital ICU Research Working Group. Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: the development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. J Crit Care. 2001 Dec;16(4):142-9. doi: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11815899 (View on PubMed)

Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17133189 (View on PubMed)

Selecky PA, Eliasson CA, Hall RI, Schneider RF, Varkey B, McCaffree DR; American College of Chest Physicians. Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cardiopulmonary diseases: American College of Chest Physicians position statement. Chest. 2005 Nov;128(5):3599-610. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3599.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16304319 (View on PubMed)

Mosenthal AC, Weissman DE, Curtis JR, Hays RM, Lustbader DR, Mulkerin C, Puntillo KA, Ray DE, Bassett R, Boss RD, Brasel KJ, Campbell M, Nelson JE. Integrating palliative care in the surgical and trauma intensive care unit: a report from the Improving Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit (IPAL-ICU) Project Advisory Board and the Center to Advance Palliative Care. Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1199-206. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc8e7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22080644 (View on PubMed)

Braus N, Campbell TC, Kwekkeboom KL, Ferguson S, Harvey C, Krupp AE, Lohmeier T, Repplinger MD, Westergaard RP, Jacobs EA, Roberts KF, Ehlenbach WJ. Prospective study of a proactive palliative care rounding intervention in a medical ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jan;42(1):54-62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4098-1. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26556622 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

837.108.17 (10942)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id