Trial Outcomes & Findings for Early Venous Reflux Ablation Ulcer Trial (NCT NCT03286140)
NCT ID: NCT03286140
Last Updated: 2024-05-20
Results Overview
For the purposes of this study, ulcer healing is defined as complete re-epithelialisation of all ulceration on the randomised (reference) leg in the absence of a scab (eschar) with no dressing required.
COMPLETED
NA
450 participants
time from date of randomisation to date of healing up to 365 days
2024-05-20
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
226
|
224
|
|
Overall Study
6-week Follow-up
|
224
|
223
|
|
Overall Study
6-month Follow-up
|
215
|
213
|
|
Overall Study
12-month Follow-up
|
203
|
204
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
211
|
208
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
15
|
16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
10
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
5
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Failure to comply
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Early Venous Reflux Ablation Ulcer Trial
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
Total
n=450 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14 • n=5 Participants
|
67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=7 Participants
|
68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
97 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
203 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
247 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
208 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
206 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
414 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight (kg)
|
88.8 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1 • n=5 Participants
|
89.5 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25.6 • n=7 Participants
|
89.1 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Height (cm)
|
170.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8 • n=5 Participants
|
171.9 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1 • n=7 Participants
|
171.2 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.0 • n=5 Participants
|
|
BMI (kg/m2 )
|
30.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=5 Participants
|
30.1 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=7 Participants
|
30.3 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Current
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Former
|
101 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
86 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
187 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Never
|
106 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
221 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous ulcer
Yes
|
117 participants
n=5 Participants
|
118 participants
n=7 Participants
|
235 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous ulcer
No
|
108 participants
n=5 Participants
|
106 participants
n=7 Participants
|
214 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Previous ulcer
Not completed
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: time from date of randomisation to date of healing up to 365 daysPopulation: For the purposes of this study, ulcer healing is defined as complete re-epithelialisation of all ulceration on the randomised (reference) leg in the absence of a scab (eschar) with no dressing required.
For the purposes of this study, ulcer healing is defined as complete re-epithelialisation of all ulceration on the randomised (reference) leg in the absence of a scab (eschar) with no dressing required.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days
|
82 days
Interval 69.0 to 92.0
|
56 days
Interval 49.0 to 66.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 weeks & time to ulcer healing up to 365 daysHealing rate will be reported at 24 weeks using the percentage of participants with a healed ulcer
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Ulcer Healing
|
76.3 percentage of participants
Interval 70.5 to 81.5
|
85.6 percentage of participants
Interval 80.6 to 89.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 12 months (and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years))Population: All participants with a healed ulcer within 1 year post-randomisation
Will be calculated up to 1 year for each study arm and with the extension, up to 5 years (median approximately 3.7 years). This will allow a very practical and easily understood assessment of the clinical difference between the 2 arms of the study. This will also allow comparison with other studies that have reported this outcome. In order to facilitate accurate calculation of reoccurrence / ulcer free time, clinical follow up will be continued after ulcer healing up to 1 year after randomisation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=194 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=210 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ulcer Recurrence / Ulcer Free Time
|
32 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 monthsPopulation: Missing data at follow-up
Disease specific (AVVQ) quality of life The Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) is a validated patient-reported disease-specific health questionnaire to assess quality of life in patients with varicose veins. The AVVQ comprises a diagram on which patients draw on their varicose veins and a questionnaire with 12 questions, half of which require a response for each leg. The scores range from 0 to 100 (no effect to severe effect).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=170 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=176 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Quality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days
6-week AVVQ
|
41.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
|
39.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
|
|
Quality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days
6-month AVVQ
|
39.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
34.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
|
|
Quality Of Life Questionnaire up to 365 Days
12-month AVVQ
|
34.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
32.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 monthsPopulation: SF-36 general health score
Generic (SF-36) quality of life assessment The Short Form questionnaire-36 items (SF-36) is a generic quality-of-life tool used to determine people's physical and mental health. It has been validated in many patient groups, including those with varicose veins. The physical domain measures physical functioning, physical role limitations, body pain and general health, whereas the mental dimension measures vitality, social functioning, mental health role limitations and general mental health. Two separate scores are produced (separate physical/mental component summary scores), in addition to the eight separate domain scores. Each score is measured on a scale of 0 to 100 (worst to best). Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=207 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=212 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Generic (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment
6-week SF-36
|
45.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2
|
45.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
|
|
Generic (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment
6-month SF-36
|
44.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1
|
44.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
|
|
Generic (SF-36) Quality of Life Assessment
12-month SF-36
|
45.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10
|
45.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 weeks post randomisation, 6 months, 12 monthsPopulation: EQ-5D health score Scores on the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension 5-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) health scale (a visual-analogue scale) range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Score on the EQ-5D-5L health index range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. The EQ-5D-5L health index was calculated with the value set for England
The EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) is a widely recognised, generic tool to measure health outcomes and has been validated in a variety of patient groups, including those with venous leg ulcers. The EQ-5D questionnaire comprises two sections; the first assesses the participant's mobility, self-care, ability to perform usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression levels, and the second records the participant's self-rated health on a vertical score of 0 to 100.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=205 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=212 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
6-week EQ-5D
|
71.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.7
|
72.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.6
|
|
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
6-month EQ-5D
|
71.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.6
|
74.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.8
|
|
EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D)
12-month EQ-5D
|
73.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.4
|
74.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 monthsPopulation: As randomised, less early withdrawals
A within-RCT cost effectiveness analysis will be carried out based on the data collected in the trial, Resource use items in hospital and community care related to the treatment of venous ulceration or complications will be recorded for each patient at each follow-up. Resource use will be multiplied by UK unit costs obtained from published literature, HRG costs, and manufacturers' list prices to calculate overall costs. A standard tariff will be applied for each bandage change. Utilities (QALYs) will be calculated from the EQ-5D questionnaire administered to patients
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=211 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=208 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Economic Assessment
|
2516 Costs (pounds) at one year
Standard Deviation 3242
|
2514 Costs (pounds) at one year
Standard Deviation 2770
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 6 weeksPopulation: CEAP classification
The presence of residual / recurrent varicose veins remaining on the venous duplex. Any reflux detected by the vascular scientists (as per local scanning policies) is recorded as presence of residual reflux and therefore considered incomplete clinical success. No presence of residual reflux is considered clinical success. (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology) ranges from C0 which means absolutely no venous disease that can be seen or felt in the legs to C6 which means an open and active venous leg ulcer. For this outcome measure: Healed venous leg ulcer (C5), Active venous leg ulcer (C6).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=225 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Success - Presence of Residual / Recurrent Reflux in the Veins
CEAP 5
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Clinical Success - Presence of Residual / Recurrent Reflux in the Veins
CEAP 6
|
225 Participants
|
224 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 6 weeksThe Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) is a component of the Venous Severity Scoring System designed in 2000 by an ad hoc American Venous Forum committee consensus, in order to compliment the CEAP classification and quantify the severity of disease and subsequent improvement or decline. The VCSS has 10 components (pain, varicose veins, venous oedema, skin pigmentation, inflammation, induration, compression used and active ulcer, duration, number and size), each with four categories assigned values of 0-3. The overall scores can range from 0 (lowest severity) to 30 (highest severity).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Success - VCSS
|
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
10.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 12 monthsNumber of complications related to the endovenous intervention
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 Participants
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 Participants
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Success - Complications
|
24 participants
|
28 participants
|
Adverse Events
Standard Therapy Arm
Early Arm
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 participants at risk
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 participants at risk
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Hospitalisation Required
|
22.1%
50/226 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
17.0%
38/224 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
|
General disorders
Other
|
0.44%
1/226 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
0.89%
2/224 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Standard Therapy Arm
n=226 participants at risk
Multilayer elastic compression bandaging/ stockings with deferred treatment of superficial reflux (usually once the ulcer has healed)
Delayed endovenous intervention
|
Early Arm
n=224 participants at risk
Early endovenous treatment of superficial venous reflux(within 2 weeks) in addition to standard compression therapy
Early endovenous ablation
|
|---|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
New ulcer
|
36.7%
83/226 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
29.9%
67/224 • AEs collected over 12-months
The research nurses collected data regarding the occurrence of all SAEs via the monthly telephone calls, clinic or surgery notes, and hospital admission records. These were reported to the ICTU via the web-based data capture system within 24 hours of the nurses becoming aware of the event and reviewed by the chief investigator.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place