Trial Outcomes & Findings for Use of Nudges To Enhance Enrollment in Critical Care Research (NCT NCT03284359)

NCT ID: NCT03284359

Last Updated: 2021-03-03

Results Overview

The primary outcome is consent rate for a simulated RCT. This is an easily measurable binary outcome that has the potential for significant impact on future trial recruitment.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

182 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 96 hours

Results posted on

2021-03-03

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle
Arm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey. Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle: The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.
Standard Consent
Arm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.
Overall Study
STARTED
93
89
Overall Study
COMPLETED
93
89
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Use of Nudges To Enhance Enrollment in Critical Care Research

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle
n=93 Participants
Arm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey. Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle: The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.
Standard Consent
n=89 Participants
Arm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.
Total
n=182 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Sex: Female, Male
Female
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
53 Participants
n=7 Participants
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=5 Participants
58.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.2 • n=7 Participants
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5 • n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
133 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Length of ICU stay at enrollment
97.8 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 73.1 • n=5 Participants
114.5 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 90.6 • n=7 Participants
106.2 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81.9 • n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 96 hours

Population: Intention to treat

The primary outcome is consent rate for a simulated RCT. This is an easily measurable binary outcome that has the potential for significant impact on future trial recruitment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle
n=93 Participants
Arm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey. Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle: The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.
Standard Consent
n=89 Participants
Arm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.
Consent Rate
27 Participants
30 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 96 hours

Population: Intention to treat

Secondarily we will quantitatively assess the participant's assessment of the risk of participating in the simulated RCT. The risk assessment tool has been previously used in the assessment of risk perception of RCT participation in the setting of behavioral economic nudges. The risk assessment will be used to evaluate participants' impressions of the risk of participating in the RCT using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (Not risky at all) to 7 (very risky), as well as 9 comparative questions, each of which asks whether a study procedure was riskier than another risky activity, such as talking on one's cell phone while driving.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle
n=93 Participants
Arm 1 will be administered a novel pre-consent nudge bundle which incorporates several behavioral economic interventions within a brief survey. Participants will subsequently be asked by the same research personnel to participate in a simulated randomized control trial (RCT) comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive the standard consent form followed by a risk assessment and demographic survey. Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle: The pre-consent nudge bundle survey was developed by the study team and incorporates several behavioral interventions into a bundle of 5 types of nudges: (i) injunctive norms; (ii) descriptive norms; (iii) duty of reciprocity; (iv) self-prophecy; and (v) foot-in-the-door. Injunctive norms involve the perception of what behavior is acceptable, while descriptive norms highlight what behaviors others are engaging in. The duty of reciprocity is the sense that one should repeat pro-social behavior for which they have benefited from. The foot-in-the-door nudge involves asking a participant to perform a small request which has a high consent rate followed by a larger request. The bundle consists of six questions and one statement.
Standard Consent
n=89 Participants
Arm 2 will serve as the control arm. Participants will be approached by the research personnel to participate in a simulated RCT comparing two mechanical ventilation weaning protocols among mechanically ventilated patients. Participants will receive a standard consent form as detailed in the Study Instruments section. Following the consent process participants will conduct the same risk assessment survey and demographic survey.
Risk Assessment
2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 5.0
2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 5.5

Adverse Events

Pre-Consent Nudge Bundle

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Standard Consent

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Katherine Courtright

University of Pennsylvania

Phone: 267-978-5083

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place