Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Procedural Safety and Efficacy of ELCA in CAD (NCT NCT03284229)
NCT ID: NCT03284229
Last Updated: 2020-09-18
Results Overview
Successful crossing of the Laser Catheter across the entire length of the stenotic lesion
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
Procedure
2020-09-18
Participant Flow
31 patients were screened. 3 patients were screen failure. 28 patients enrolled in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Enrolled
Excimer Laser Coronary Atherectomy (ELCA) Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Enrolled
Excimer Laser Coronary Atherectomy (ELCA) Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.26 • n=25 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
19 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
25 participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Height
|
163.50 cms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.68 • n=25 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
70.80 kgs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.37 • n=25 Participants
|
|
Angina Class
Class 0/I
|
3 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Angina Class
Class II
|
17 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Angina Class
Class III
|
4 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
|
Angina Class
Class IV
|
1 Participants
n=25 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureSuccessful crossing of the Laser Catheter across the entire length of the stenotic lesion
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Participants With Device Success During Procedure Defined as the Successful Crossing of the Laser Catheter Across the Entire Length of the Stenotic Lesion
Success
|
25 Participants
|
|
Participants With Device Success During Procedure Defined as the Successful Crossing of the Laser Catheter Across the Entire Length of the Stenotic Lesion
Failure
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureTarget lesions with less than 50% residual stenosis after laser and adjunctive therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Participants With Procedural Success Defined as Target Lesions With Less Than 50% Residual Stenosis After Laser and Adjunctive Therapy During Procedure
< 50%
|
25 Participants
|
|
Participants With Procedural Success Defined as Target Lesions With Less Than 50% Residual Stenosis After Laser and Adjunctive Therapy During Procedure
≥ 50%
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 30 daysPopulation: Safety success includes 25 subjects that completed follow up and 3 subjects that were Lost To Follow Up
Freedom from Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac tamponade and life threatening arrhythmias.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=28 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
No Major Adverse Cardiac Events
|
28 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Death
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Non-Q-wave
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Q-wave myocardial infarction
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Target Lesion Revascularization
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Cardiac Tamponade
|
0 Participants
|
|
Safety Success - Participants With Freedom From Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) Defined as Death, Non-Q-wave and Q-wave Myocardial Infarction (MI), Target Lesion Revascularization, Cardiac Tamponade and Life Threatening Arrhythmias
Life threatening arrhythmias
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: pre-procedure and post-procedureTo determine post-procedural TIMI Flow grade. Changes of TIMI Grade flow after Index Procedure by measuring pre-procedure TIMI grade flow and post-procedure TIMI grade flow. TIMI flow is a scoring system from 0-3 referring to levels of coronary blood flow assessed during percutaneous coronary angioplasty. TIMI flow was assessed before and after the procedure. TIMI grade flow 0-3 are as described below. * TIMI 0 flow (no perfusion) refers to the absence of any antegrade flow beyond a coronary occlusion. * TIMI 1 flow (penetration without perfusion) is faint antegrade coronary flow beyond the occlusion, with incomplete filling of the distal coronary bed. * TIMI 2 flow (partial reperfusion) is delayed or sluggish antegrade flow with complete filling of the distal territory. * TIMI 3 is normal flow which fills the distal coronary bed completely.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
TIMI Flow
Pre-Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 0
|
0 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Pre-Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 1
|
12 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Pre-Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 2
|
9 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Pre-Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 3
|
4 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Post Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 0
|
0 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Post Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 1
|
0 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Post Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 2
|
0 Participants
|
|
TIMI Flow
Post Procedure TIMI grade flow · TIMI grade flow 3
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureTortuosity from coronary angiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Lesion Morphology - Coronary Tortuosity Based on Degree of Tortuosity
> 90°
|
3 Participants
|
|
Lesion Morphology - Coronary Tortuosity Based on Degree of Tortuosity
< 45°
|
14 Participants
|
|
Lesion Morphology - Coronary Tortuosity Based on Degree of Tortuosity
45° - 90°
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureEccentricity from coronary angiography as concentric (symmetric) or eccentric (asymmetric)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Lesion Morphology - Eccentricity of Coronary Lesion
Concentric lesions
|
17 Participants
|
|
Lesion Morphology - Eccentricity of Coronary Lesion
Eccentric lesions
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureContour from coronary angiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Lesion Morphology - Contour as a Lesion Characteristic
Irregular Contour
|
20 Participants
|
|
Lesion Morphology - Contour as a Lesion Characteristic
Smooth Contour
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureBifurcation from coronary angiography
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Lesion Morphology - Bifurcation (Branch or Division of Artery)
Bifurcation
|
0 Participants
|
|
Lesion Morphology - Bifurcation (Branch or Division of Artery)
No Bifurcation
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureTo determine device related complications
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Participants With Device-related Complications During Procedure
Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Participants With Device-related Complications During Procedure
No
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: ProcedureTo determine procedure related complications
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=25 Participants
Enrolled Patients
|
|---|---|
|
Participants With Procedure-related Complications During Procedure
Yes
|
0 Participants
|
|
Participants With Procedure-related Complications During Procedure
No
|
25 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Enrolled
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Enrolled
n=28 participants at risk
Enrolled Patients, including LTFU
|
|---|---|
|
Investigations
Cardiac troponin I increased
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected throughout the clinical investigation in the case report form. Any adverse event will be followed until one month follow up visit.
Adverse event definition and classification adapted from ISO 14155
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected throughout the clinical investigation in the case report form. Any adverse event will be followed until one month follow up visit.
Adverse event definition and classification adapted from ISO 14155
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Dyspnoea exertional
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Adverse event data were collected throughout the clinical investigation in the case report form. Any adverse event will be followed until one month follow up visit.
Adverse event definition and classification adapted from ISO 14155
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place