Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic Cough

NCT ID: NCT03282591

Last Updated: 2021-05-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

185 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-03

Study Completion Date

2018-09-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of serlopitant for the treatment of refractory chronic cough

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Refractory Chronic Cough

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

Serlopitant Tablets

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Serlopitant Tablets

Matching Placebo Tablets

Placebo Tablets

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Matching Placebo Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

5 mg Serlopitant Tablets

Serlopitant Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching Placebo Tablets

Placebo Tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VPD-737

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female and males between 18 and 80 years of age
* Have a diagnosis of treatment refractory chronic cough or unexplained cough for at least one year
* Chest radiograph or computed tomography (CT) Thorax within the last 5 years not demonstrating any abnormality considered to be significantly contributing to the chronic cough
* At Screening have a score of ≥ 40mm on the Cough Severity VAS
* At Baseline (Day 0) have a score of ≥ 40mm on the Cough Severity VAS
* All female subjects who are of childbearing potential must practice highly effective contraception (i.e., pregnancy prevention method with a failure rate of \< 1% per year) from the time of the initial screening visit until 4 weeks after last dose of study drug. Please refer to the protocol for acceptable methods of contraception

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior treatment with serlopitant or other NK1-R antagonist
* Presence of any medical condition or disability that could interfere with study
* History of hypersensitivity to serlopitant or any of its components
* Currently pregnant or male partner of pregnant female
* Females of childbearing potential who are unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception or who are breast feeding
* Current smoker or individuals who have given up smoking within the past 12 months
* FEV1/FVC \< 60%
* Body mass index (BMI) \<18 kg/m2 or ≥ 40 kg/m2 at Screening
* History of upper or lower respiratory tract infection or recent significant change in pulmonary status within 4 weeks of the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
* History of cystic fibrosis
* History of opioid use within 1 week of the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
* Requiring concomitant therapy with prohibited medications
* Treatment with biologic therapies within 8 weeks or 5 half-lives prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0), whichever is longer
* Treatment with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors within 4 weeks prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
* Treatment with any investigational therapy within 4 weeks (investigational biologic therapies within 8 weeks) prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0)
* Serum creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 2x the upper limit of normal (ULN) during screening
* Positive test for any drug of abuse
* History of malignancy within 5 years prior to the Baseline Visit (Day 0), with the exception of completely treated and non-metastatic basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Any known psychiatric diagnosis meeting DSM-5 criteria which may confound the assessment of serlopitant safety or efficacy, or interfere with the subject's ability to comply with protocol-mandated activities, within 3 years prior to randomization. Examples of such DSM-5 diagnoses include but are not limited to major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychotic disorder, intellectual disability, severe alcohol use disorder.
* Known active hepatitis infection
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vyne Therapeutics Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacky Smith

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manchester, United Kingdom

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Study Site 130

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site 128

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site 123

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site 127

San Jose, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site 131

Stockton, California, United States

Site Status

Study Site 106

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Study Site 113

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Study Site 108

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Study Site 118

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site 107

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Study Site 115

Plymouth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site 110

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Study Site 121

Ocean Township, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Study Site 125

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Study Site 129

Charleston, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 103

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 111

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 114

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 122

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Study Site 112

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Study Site 117

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Study Site 116

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Study Site 104

Rock Hill, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Study Site 102

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 120

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 101

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 109

Waco, Texas, United States

Site Status

Study Site 126

Bellingham, Washington, United States

Site Status

Study Site 105

Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Study Site 133

Belfast, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 139

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 136

Cottingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 141

Llanelli, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 138

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 137

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 132

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 135

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 134

Preston, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Study Site 140

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-003250-16

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MTI-110

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GSK2339345 Hypertussive Challenge Study
NCT01899768 COMPLETED PHASE2
Cough Desensitization Therapy: Pilot 2
NCT05226299 COMPLETED PHASE1