Reflexology and Quality of Life

NCT ID: NCT03280524

Last Updated: 2018-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2017-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with 60 type 2 diabetes patients divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of reflexology on the quality of life and functional capacity of patients at risk for diabetic neuropathy. This is a randomized, controlled and blind clinical trial with type 2 diabetes patients. The eligibility criteria are 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. As exclusion criteria, it will be considered the presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology. For the calculation of the sample size, a pilot test will be conducted with 8 diabetic patients. It will be used the statistical software Biostat® 5.3. The sample found was of 60 patients who were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each, Control Group (CG) and Treatment Group (TG). The TG will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology, while the CG will only receive the guideline. For the evaluations, it will be applied the instrument for quality of life (SF-36) and for functional capacity, the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire. This research will follow the standards set by resolution 466/12 of the National Health Council, for research with human beings and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Foot

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Reflexology,diabetes, quality of life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The patients will be taken to a room reserved for the procedure. First, the patients answer the research instruments and then they will be asked to lie supine on a stretcher. The feet of the patients will be cleaned with water (37ºC) and mild soap and then will be dry with paper towels. The next phase consists in the application of foot massage, that will follow the Lourenço's Protocol (2012), which consists of 14 steps of relaxation massage. Each step will have duration of 1 minute, 3 procedures by week, by 4 consecutive weeks. The research instruments, SF-36 and Stanford Health Assessment Questionnarie will be applied before the first and after the last procedure.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
To ensure the blinding, the study included an interventionist enabled for application of foot reflexology.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

Control Group will receive self-care guidelines with feet

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

self-care guidelines with feet

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment Group

Treatment will receive self-care guidelines with feet and 12 sessions of foot reflexology

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

reflexology

Intervention Type OTHER

self-care guidelines with feet

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

reflexology

Intervention Type OTHER

self-care guidelines with feet

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

massage education

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 10 years or more of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, between the ages of 50 to 75 years, both sexes, and registered in the Primary Health Care Unit of São João or in the Diabetes Education Center in Minas Gerais state, Brazil.

Exclusion Criteria

* presence of ulcers in the feet, amputations of the lower limbs, deficits in cognitive abilities, and previous treatment using reflexology
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidade do Vale do Sapucai

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Beatriz Bertolaccini Martínez

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Beatriz Ms Martínez, doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidade do Vale do Sapucai

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Diabetes Education Center

Pouso Alegre, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aguiar CC, Vieira AP, Carvalho AF, Montenegro-Junior RM. [Assessment instruments for a Health-Related Quality of Life in diabetes mellitus]. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2008 Aug;52(6):931-9. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27302008000600004. Portuguese.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18820804 (View on PubMed)

Kaul K, Tarr JM, Ahmad SI, Kohner EM, Chibber R. Introduction to diabetes mellitus. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;771:1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5441-0_1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23393665 (View on PubMed)

Tiran D, Chummun H. The physiological basis of reflexology and its use as a potential diagnostic tool. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2005 Feb;11(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ctnm.2004.07.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15984227 (View on PubMed)

Armstrong AR, Thiebaut SP, Brown LJ, Nepal B. Australian adults use complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of chronic illness: a national study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2011 Aug;35(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00745.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21806735 (View on PubMed)

Wang MY, Tsai PS, Lee PH, Chang WY, Yang CM. The efficacy of reflexology: systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Jun;62(5):512-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04606.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18489444 (View on PubMed)

Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1593914 (View on PubMed)

Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 5349366 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAAE: 30795814.8.0000.5102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id