Effect of Non-nutritive Sweeteners of High Sugar Sweetened Beverages on Metabolic Health and Gut Microbiome
NCT ID: NCT03259685
Last Updated: 2025-12-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
41 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-18
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective of this project is to evaluate whether steviol glycosides sweetened beverages (SGSB) or aspartame/acesulfame K sweetened beverages (AASB) exert beneficial, neutral or detrimental effects on metabolic health of regular consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), and whether modulation of the gut microbiome is involved in the resulting impact of these NNSs on metabolic health.
As chronic overconsumption of SSBs is clearly associated with an increased cardiometabolic risk, this study will be the first to determine the metabolic impact of replacing SSBs by potentially "healthier alternatives" such as the increasingly popular stevia-based soft drinks and aspartame-based soft drinks. The investigators will further investigate whether these NNS can cause pernicious effects on intestinal health and the gut microbiome. It is a crucial concern since the importance of this unsuspected key "organ" has been ignored for too long and its important implication in many chronic societal diseases has just been discovered.
Results of this study could have a direct influence on health, nutrition and even agricultural policies as well as dietary guidelines around the world. This project is also critically important as an increasing amount of health professionals such as physicians, nurses and registered dietitians seek to provide evidenced-based guidance to individuals looking for healthier alternatives to SSBs including stevia-based or aspartame-based soft drinks.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Regular beverages
Sugar sweetened soft drinks
710 ml of regular soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume regular soft drinks to test if there is a significant difference on the impact on gut microbiota composition and metabolic syndrome parameters between this treatment and the active treatments (diet and stevia beverages).
Diet beverages
Soft drinks sweetened with artificial non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. aspartame, acesulfame-K)
710 ml of diet soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume diet soft drinks during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of aspartame/acesulfame-K sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
Stevia beverages
Soft drinks sweetened with natural non-nutritive sweeteners (i.e. steviol glycosides)
710 ml of stevia-sweetened soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume soft drinks containing stevia during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of steviol glycosides sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
710 ml of regular soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume regular soft drinks to test if there is a significant difference on the impact on gut microbiota composition and metabolic syndrome parameters between this treatment and the active treatments (diet and stevia beverages).
710 ml of diet soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume diet soft drinks during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of aspartame/acesulfame-K sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
710 ml of stevia-sweetened soft drinks, taken daily for 10 weeks
Subjects will consume soft drinks containing stevia during 10 weeks to test the possible effects of steviol glycosides sweetened beverages on gut microbiota composition and on metabolic syndrome parameters.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Soft drinks consumers (between 4 cans/week to 4 cans/day)
Exclusion Criteria
* Daily consumption of more than 4 cans of soft drinks
* Regular use of medication affecting study parameters
* Change of medication (type or dose) in the last year
* Use of antibiotics in the last 3 months
* Change in natural health product use in the last 3 months
* More than 2 alcohol drinks par day
* Weight change of more than 5% in the last 3 months
* Surgery in the last 3 months or planed during the study
* Allergy or intolerance for products contained in soft drinks
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Laval University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marie-Claude Vohl
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marie-Claude Vohl
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Laval University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Laval University
Québec, , Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bergwall S, Johansson A, Sonestedt E, Acosta S. High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;1(1):CD013320. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013320.pub2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SBG 2017-136
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id