A Study of Border Line Cases of Velopharyngeal Incompetence Using Cephalometry and Nasofibroscopy

NCT ID: NCT03259061

Last Updated: 2017-08-23

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Total Enrollment: 50 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2017-09-01
• Study Completion Date: 2019-11-30

Brief Summary

The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of cephalometry &nasofibroscopy as objective tools in order to confirm the diagnosis based upon the clinical judgment of border line cases suspected to have velopharyngeal incompetence or insufficiency.

Detailed Description

The velopharyngeal mechanism is constituted by the muscles of the soft palate, posterior and lateral pharyngeal walls (1), separating the oropharynx from the nasopharynx. Such structures, particularly the soft palate, play a key role in the velopharyngeal closure physiology (2). Velopharyngeal closure patterns may be classified as follows: coronal, where there is predominant soft palate movement toward the posterior pharyngeal wall; sagittal, where there is predominant movement of the lateral pharyngeal walls toward the pharynx midline; circular, where balanced movements of lateral pharyngeal walls and soft palate are observed; circular with Passavant's ridge, where the circular closure is associated with the development of a mucosal fold named Passavant's ridge on the posterior pharyngeal wall(3). The velopharyngeal closure allows the separation between the nasal and oral cavities during activities such as oral sounds emission, blowing, whistling, swallowing, sucking and vomiting reflex, respecting the level of closure demanded by each activity (4,5).

In cases where the structures of the velopharyngeal mechanism do not work properly, the presence of a space called velopharyngeal aperture is observed between them, characterizing a velopharyngeal dysfunction. One of the reasons for the occurrence of such an aperture is the shortage of soft palate tissue. This dysfunction is called velopharyngeal insufficiency and may be corrected either surgically or by prosthetic management followed by speech therapy. In cases where such dysfunction occurs because of a failure in the velopharyngeal structures movement, physiological or neuromotor deficiency, it is called velopharyngeal incompetence that may be eliminated by means of speech therapy (2,6). On the other hand, if such condition is a result of the presence of compensatory articulations or other speech learning errors, it does not reflect physical or neuromuscular alterations, constituting indication for speech therapy(7). Individuals with velopharyngeal dysfunction present hypernasality, nasal air emission, poor intraoral pressure, and may present associated nasal/facial movements and compensatory articulations during the emission of oral consonants (8,9).

Assessment of the velopharyngeal function can be done by the following procedures:

1. Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy (FFN) allows direct transnasal observation of the anatomy and dynamic activity of the velopharyngeal sphincter. Such observations can be recorded for permanent documentation by coupling FFN to a video camera with simultaneous audio recording. Numerous published reports discuss the advantages of FFN as a clinical method for evaluating velopharyngeal function during speech (10).

Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy (FFN) is a valuable tool for direct visualization because it allows observation of the velopharyngeal valve during dynamic activity for a prolonged period with (1) Minimal interference of the structures involved and (2) No radiation exposure. Whereas most clinicians acknowledge the theoretic advantages of FFN and accept it as a valid technique for assessing velopharyngeal function, there are few published studies that have addressed the validity and reliability of endoscopic procedures (10). Endoscopic evaluation has high face validity, and several reports have indicated that FFN has good construct validity when compared with radiologic assessments (11).

2. Cephalometric analysis, is the clinical application of cephalometry. It is analysis of the dental and skeletal relationships of a human skull and is frequently used by dentists, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons as a treatment planning tool.

Cephalometric analysis can also be applied for assessing the velopharyngeal structure and function. More specifically, velopharyngeal function in terms of its shape and mobility was analyzed quantitatively on the basis of cephalometric principle (12,13).

Border line cases of velopharyngeal incompetence of insufficiency are known to be problematic and usually causes confusion for phoniatricians especially in patients who will undergo adenotonsillectomy. For this purpose, objective assessment is necessary to support or reject the clinical findings of VPI cases.

Conditions

Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: COHORT
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy

1. Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy (FFN) allows direct transnasal observation of the anatomy and dynamic activity of the velopharyngeal sphincter. Such observations can be recorded for permanent documentation by coupling FFN to a video camera with simultaneous audio recording. Numerous published reports discuss the advantages of FFN as a clinical method for evaluating velopharyngeal function during speech (10).

2. Cephalometric analysis, is the clinical application of cephalometry. It is analysis of the dental and skeletal relationships of a human skull and is frequently used by dentists, orthodontists, and oral and maxillofacial surgeons as a treatment planning tool.

Cephalometric analysis can also be applied for assessing the velopharyngeal structure and function. More specifically, velopharyngeal function in terms of its shape and mobility was analyzed quantitatively on the basis of cephalometric principle

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Cephalometry

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients must have border line velopharyngeal abnormality which was diagnosed clinically.

Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent(if he was a child so his parents or his guardian should has tis ability)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Mental Retardation.

2. Presence of Neurological deficit affecting speech.

3. Palatal paralysis or paresis.

4. Overt cleft palate.

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

AbdElAzeez Mohammad Faheem Darweesh

Dr

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Abdelazez Darwesh, doctor

Role: CONTACT

dr.abdelazez.darwesh@gmail.com

+201002600619

References

Camargo LO, Rodrigues CM, Avelar JA. Oclusão velofaríngea em indivíduos submetidos à nasoendoscopia na Clínica de Educação para Saúde (CEPS) 20(1):35-48, 2001.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Skolnick ML, McCALL GN, Barnes M. The sphincteric mechanism of velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J. 1973 Jul;10:286-305. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 4513919 (View on PubMed)

Penido FA, Noronha RM, Caetano KI, Jesus MS, Di Ninno CQ, Britto AT. Correlação entre os achados do teste de emissão de ar nasal e da nasofaringoscopia em pacientes com fissura labiopalatina operada. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(2):126-34.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Mourão D, Souza GS, Torres LV, Vaz RN, Prado SG. Estudo sobre desenvolvimento fonológico em fissurados: implicações na fala e na linguagem. Estudos. 2006;33(5/6):425-41.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

De Bodt M, Van Lierde K. Cleft palate speech and velopharyngeal dysfunction: the approach of the speech therapist. B-ENT. 2006;2 Suppl 4:63-70.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17366850 (View on PubMed)

Trindade IE, Genaro KF, Yamashita RP, Miguel HC, Fukushiro AP. [Proposal for velopharyngeal function rating in a speech perceptual assessment]. Pro Fono. 2005 May-Aug;17(2):259-62. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872005000200015. Portuguese.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16909536 (View on PubMed)

Witt PD. Management of velopharyngeal dysfunction. In: Persing JA, Evans GR. Soft-tissue surgery of the craniofacial region. New York: Informa; 2007. p.113-28.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Smith BE, Kuehn DP. Speech evaluation of velopharyngeal dysfunction. J Craniofac Surg. 2007 Mar;18(2):251-61; quiz 266-7. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31803ecf3b.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17414269 (View on PubMed)

D'Antonio LL, Marsh JL, Province MA, Muntz HR, Phillips CJ. Reliability of flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy for evaluation of velopharyngeal function in a clinical population. Cleft Palate J. 1989 Jul;26(3):217-25; discussion 225.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 2758674 (View on PubMed)

Mourino AP, Weinberg B. A cephalometric study of velar stretch in 8 and 10-year old children. Cleft Palate J. 1975 Oct;12:417-35.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 1058753 (View on PubMed)

Simpson RK, Colton J. A cephalometric study of velar stretch in adolescent subjects. Cleft Palate J. 1980 Jan;17(1):40-7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 6928116 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Border line VPI study

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id