Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Study of Depo Provera Comparing Lay Health Workers and Clinically-trained Health Workers (NCT NCT03255941)

NCT ID: NCT03255941

Last Updated: 2021-04-13

Results Overview

Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Target enrollment

460 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3 months from randomization

Results posted on

2021-04-13

Participant Flow

461 participants were assessed for eligibility and 460 were randomized to a provider.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
Family Welfare Workers that are clinically trained providers in the urban setting of Karachi
Lay Provider - Urban
Lady Health Workers that are not clinically trained in the urban setting of Karachi
Clinic Provider - Rural
Famly Welfare Workers that are clinically trained providers in the rural setting of Thatta
Lay Provider - Rural
Lady Health Workers that are not clinically trained providers in the rural setting of Thatta
Overall Study
STARTED
177
178
53
52
Overall Study
Deemed Eligible to Receive DMPA
140
134
48
46
Overall Study
COMPLETED
139
132
48
46
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
38
46
5
6

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
Family Welfare Workers that are clinically trained providers in the urban setting of Karachi
Lay Provider - Urban
Lady Health Workers that are not clinically trained in the urban setting of Karachi
Clinic Provider - Rural
Famly Welfare Workers that are clinically trained providers in the rural setting of Thatta
Lay Provider - Rural
Lady Health Workers that are not clinically trained providers in the rural setting of Thatta
Overall Study
Not eligible or refused injection
37
44
5
6
Overall Study
Did not complete exit interview
1
2
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Clinic Provider Urban
n=177 Participants
Clinic provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider Urban
n=178 Participants
Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Clinic Provider Rural
n=53 Participants
Clinic provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider Rural
n=52 Participants
Clinic provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Total
n=460 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
28.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=177 Participants
27.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.0 • n=178 Participants
30.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.1 • n=53 Participants
29.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2 • n=52 Participants
28.14 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=460 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
177 Participants
n=177 Participants
178 Participants
n=178 Participants
53 Participants
n=53 Participants
52 Participants
n=52 Participants
460 Participants
n=460 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=177 Participants
0 Participants
n=178 Participants
0 Participants
n=53 Participants
0 Participants
n=52 Participants
0 Participants
n=460 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Pakistan
177 participants
n=177 Participants
178 participants
n=178 Participants
53 participants
n=53 Participants
52 participants
n=52 Participants
460 participants
n=460 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months from randomization

Population: Clients of lay providers or clinic providers who are screened appropriately for injectable contraceptive use

Number of participants that were appropriately screened for injectable contraceptive use in both rural and urban settings in Pakistan.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
n=176 Participants
Urban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider - Urban
n=176 Participants
Urban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Clinic Provider - Rural
n=52 Participants
Rural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Lay Provider - Rural
n=52 Participants
Rural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use
Screening appropriate
155 Participants
136 Participants
49 Participants
51 Participants
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Screened for Contraceptive Use
Screening not appropriate
21 Participants
40 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months from randomization

Population: Clients of lay and clinic providers who receive appropriate counseling for Injectable contraceptive use.

Number of participants that were appropriately counseled by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
n=177 Participants
Urban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider - Urban
n=178 Participants
Urban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Clinic Provider - Rural
n=53 Participants
Rural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Lay Provider - Rural
n=52 Participants
Rural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.
Counseling not appropriate
160 Participants
154 Participants
29 Participants
23 Participants
Number of Participants That Were Appropriately Counseled for DMPA Use.
Counseling appropriate
17 Participants
24 Participants
24 Participants
29 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months from randomization

Population: Clients of lay and clinic providers reports of satisfaction with the DMPA method received.

DMPA clients served by both types of providers in both urban and rural settings will report whether or not they were satisfied with the DMPA method provided to them.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
n=135 Participants
Urban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider - Urban
n=139 Participants
Urban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Clinic Provider - Rural
n=45 Participants
Rural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Lay Provider - Rural
n=49 Participants
Rural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Proportion of Clients Providers Who Report Satisfaction With the DMPA Method Received From the Provider
107 Participants
108 Participants
41 Participants
42 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months from randomization

Population: Clients of lay and clinic providers who report satisfaction with DMPA services provided by their provider.

Clients who received intramuscular or subcutaneous DMPA injections will report whether or not they were satisfied with the services provided to them by their provider.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Clinic Provider - Urban
n=139 Participants
Urban Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use DMPA or Sayana Press.
Lay Provider - Urban
n=132 Participants
Urban Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Clinic Provider - Rural
n=48 Participants
Rural Clinic Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Lay Provider - Rural
n=46 Participants
Rural Lay Provider providing DMPA or Sayana Press The safety and effectiveness of provision of injectable contraception will be compared between providers' screening and counseling for eligibility to use Sayana Press or DMPA
Proportion of Clients Who Report Satisfaction With Provider Services
125 Participants
112 Participants
42 Participants
40 Participants

Adverse Events

Lay Provider & DMPA

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Lay Provider & Sayana Press

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clinic Provider & DMPA

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Clinic Provider and Sayana Press

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Mario Chen

FHI 360

Phone: 919 544 7040

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place