Actionable Results: Bloodstream Infection Molecular Assay Evaluation

NCT ID: NCT03255759

Last Updated: 2021-03-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

312 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-24

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A number of rapid panel-based molecular assays for direct organism identification and resistance characterization in positive blood culture bottles are now commercially available. They have been shown to improve accuracy and decrease the time-to-result, allowing targeted treatment in hospitalized patients with bacteraemia, in high-income countries (HICs). However, these molecular assays are add-on tests performed in addition to conventional testing, increasing the complexity of diagnostic algorithms and costs of patient care. Conventional organism identification includes performing a Gram stain, biochemical identification and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing. The FilmArray Blood Culture Identification (BioFire, USA) is an example of a rapid panel-based molecular assay that combines nesting and multiplexing of PCR (nested multiplex PCR) to detect multiple pathogens simultaneously. There are limited data on how such tests impact patient management, health care costs and how they can better be incorporated into diagnostic algorithms.

The aim of this study is to assess the added value and acceptability of a multiplexed molecular diagnostic assay in the identification of pathogens in patients presenting with bacteremia at hospitals in LMICs, and to assess health care providers' satisfaction with the assay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will address the following questions:

1. What impact can we project if additional diagnostic information were to be provided to clinicians in terms of patient outcomes, costs, and antibiotic use?
2. What are the workflow constraints on returning diagnostic results to clinicians and/or antibiotic stewardship programs? Overall, the aim is to assess the added value and acceptability of a multiplexed molecular diagnostic assay in the identification of pathogens in patients presenting with bacteremia at hospitals in LMICs and to assess health care providers' satisfaction with the assay.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bloodstream Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Molecular dx arm

Positive blood cultures are tested using a molecular ID system in addition to the standard of care (biochemical identification)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Multiplex molecular diagnostic assay

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

To assess the added value and acceptability of a multiplexed molecular diagnostic assay in the identification of pathogens in patients presenting with bacteremia at hospitals in LMICs, and to assess health care providers' satisfaction with the assay.

Standard of care arm

Positive blood cultures are treated as per normal lab protocol (biochemical identification)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Multiplex molecular diagnostic assay

To assess the added value and acceptability of a multiplexed molecular diagnostic assay in the identification of pathogens in patients presenting with bacteremia at hospitals in LMICs, and to assess health care providers' satisfaction with the assay.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* For patients of Princess Marina Hospital: all participants who have a blood culture done as part of routine clinical care that is found to be positive through routine laboratory testing from Monday-Friday 8am-3pm (excluding holidays) will be eligible for inclusion in the study, regardless of age and co-morbidities.
* For the professionals making use of molecular testing: Attending physicians (paediatricians, internists, and physician trainees \[residents, medical officers, interns\]) caring for adults and children who are enrolled in the study, Microbiologists and microbiology technologists who have experience operating the BioFire FilmArray and/or traditional blood culture incubation systems at the laboratory.

Exclusion Criteria

* For patients of Princess Marina Hospital: Individuals who have previously participated in the study by having a blood culture positive in the week prior will not be eligible to participate again within the 7-day time frame.
* For professionals making use of molecular testing: Individuals working with patients or laboratory samples at Princess Marina Hospital for less than one month will not be asked to participate.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeffrey Pernica, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

David Goldfarb, MD, FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of British Columbia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Princess Marina Hospital

Gaborone, , Botswana

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Botswana

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08821/1/1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Role of Multiplex PCR in CAP
NCT06097117 UNKNOWN