Trial Outcomes & Findings for PRECISION Study: Multi-center Study of Performance of a Novel Implanted CGM System Using a Next Generation Transmitter and Algorithm (NCT NCT03251079)
NCT ID: NCT03251079
Last Updated: 2024-02-12
Results Overview
The effectiveness endpoint is the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), calculated for all paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose measurements through 90 days of Sensor use. MARD is defined as the average of absolute difference of paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose readings divided by the reference glucose reading (reference) for all reference glucose values, that is: MARD = ((SUM \| (Glucose)sensor - (Glucose)reference \| / (Glucose)reference ) / n ) x 100%, where n is the total number of CGM and reference glucose pairs after 90 days of sensor use (MARD is a percentage). Lower MARDs indicate higher (better) accuracy.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
90 days
2024-02-12
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
PRECISION Study: Multi-center Study of Performance of a Novel Implanted CGM System Using a Next Generation Transmitter and Algorithm
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
n=35 Participants
Senseonics continuous glucose monitoring system
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted continuous glucose monitoring system
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than One Race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-Hispanic
|
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
35 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index Class: Normal, Overweight, Obese
|
28.2 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Dominant Hand: Right, Left
Right
|
33 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Dominant Hand: Right, Left
Left
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Type: Type I, Type II
Type I
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diabetes Type: Type I, Type II
Type II
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Years Since Diabetes Diagnosis
|
26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of insulin therapy
None
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of insulin therapy
Multiple daily injections
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Type of insulin therapy
Continuous insulin infusion pump
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia in past 6 months
Ketoacidosis
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
History of ketoacidosis and hypoglycemia in past 6 months
Hypoglycemia
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysThe effectiveness endpoint is the mean absolute relative difference (MARD), calculated for all paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose measurements through 90 days of Sensor use. MARD is defined as the average of absolute difference of paired Senseonics CGM System and reference glucose readings divided by the reference glucose reading (reference) for all reference glucose values, that is: MARD = ((SUM \| (Glucose)sensor - (Glucose)reference \| / (Glucose)reference ) / n ) x 100%, where n is the total number of CGM and reference glucose pairs after 90 days of sensor use (MARD is a percentage). Lower MARDs indicate higher (better) accuracy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
n=15170 Matched CGM and YSI pairs
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Accuracy of CGM System Through 90 Days Post-Insertion (MARD for Paired CGM and Reference Glucose Measurements)
|
9.6 percent
Interval 8.9 to 10.4
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 90 daysIncidence of device-related or sensor insertion/removal procedure-related serious adverse events through 90 days post-insertion.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
n=35 Participants
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Safety Endpoint
|
0 serious adverse events
Interval 0.0 to 3.5
|
Adverse Events
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
n=35 participants at risk
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Other - Gastroenteritis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypoglycemic episode
|
2.9%
1/35 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other - Wound infection left foot, grade 4
|
2.9%
1/35 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device
n=35 participants at risk
Continuous glucose monitoring system: Implanted with Senseonics Eversense® Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System (Eversense® CGM System).
|
|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Common Cold
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 4 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Sensor Location Site - Pain/Discomfort
|
5.7%
2/35 • Number of events 2 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other - Upper Respiratory Infection
|
8.6%
3/35 • Number of events 3 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
11.4%
4/35 • Number of events 5 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other - Pneumonia
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other - Pilonidal cyst
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other - Difficulty removing sensor
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Adhesive Patch Location Site - Irritation including redness, excoriation or ulceration
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Other - Darkening of skin at proximal end of sensor
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 2 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Other - Vaginal Infection
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
General disorders
Other - Dental Caries
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Other - Arthritis
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • Through 90 days post Sensor insertion and sensor removal 10-day follow-up (up to 100 days)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60