Renal Nerve Denervation After Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

NCT ID: NCT03246568

Last Updated: 2021-10-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-17

Study Completion Date

2020-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Electrical isolation of the pulmonary vein (PVI) by radiofrequency energy or cryoablation has been shown to be an effective treatment of AF by reducing morbidity, improving quality of life and functional capacity.

Renal artery sympathetic denervation (RND) by catheter ablation has been shown in a preliminary study to improve outcome of PVI in patients with paroxysmal and/or persistent AF with concomitant refractory or moderate hypertension. In patients with renal impairment, RND also conferred benefit in reducing AF recurrence after PVI. The initial indication for catheter-based RND is for blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. However, a recent study failed to show significant difference in blood pressure reduction by RND. Therefore, the effect of RND on AF suppression may be independent of blood pressure control. Possible mechanisms of RND on AF may include risk factors modification and anti-arrhythmic effect.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective randomized study aimed to evaluate the effect of RDN added to PVI for persistent AF. Study will be performed in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Hypothesis: Catheter based RDN can prevent recurrence of AF in patient with persistent AF undergoing PVI by mechanism not related to hypertension control.

Primary outcome measure: Freedom from documented AF episodes post PVI as defined by longer than 30 seconds of AF recorded by implantable loop recorder 2 to 18 months after procedure with or without antiarrhythmic medication.

Sample Size:

This is an exploratory study, the sample size calculation will not be applied and arbitrary assign 20 subjects to each arm will be adopted.

Randomization Arms:

Patients are randomized in 1:1 fraction to one of the following arms:

1. PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation;
2. PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation plus bilateral RND using a multi-electrode renal denervation catheter.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Research on the Basis of Earlier Theory Renal artery sympathetic denervation (RND) by catheter ablation has been shown in a preliminary study to improve outcome of electrical isolation of the pulmonary vein (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal and/or persistent AF with concomitant refractory hypertension and the same group later showed renal sympathetic denervation improved outcome of PVI in the cohort of paroxysmal and/or persistent AF patients with moderate hypertension. In patients with renal impairment, RND also conferred benefit in reducing AF recurrence after PVI.The initial indication for catheter-based RND is for blood pressure control in patients with resistant hypertension. Early data from clinical trials without sham controls was promising - demonstrating large blood pressure reductions in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone

PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation

Renal nerve denervation

PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation plus bilateral RND using a multi-electrode renal denervation catheter.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Renal Nerve Denervation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral renal denervation using a multi-polar radiofrequency ablation catheter (Symplicity™ Spyral Cather, Medtronic) in the right and left main, branch, and accessory renal arteries in vessels ranging in diameter between 3 and 8 mm.

Pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Renal Nerve Denervation

Bilateral renal denervation using a multi-polar radiofrequency ablation catheter (Symplicity™ Spyral Cather, Medtronic) in the right and left main, branch, and accessory renal arteries in vessels ranging in diameter between 3 and 8 mm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pulmonary vein isolation

PVI by cryo-balloon ablation without linear ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Renal artery sympathetic nerve denervation RND PVI

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients age is 18 years or greater;
2. Patients undergoing a first-time ablation procedure for AF;
3. Patients with persistent AF;
4. Persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting \> 7 days and less than 3 years.
5. Patients with symptomatic AF that is refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication;
6. Symptomatic patients are those who have been aware of their AF at any time within the last 5 years prior to enrollment. Symptoms may include, but are not restricted to, palpitations, shortness of breath, chest pain, fatigue, left ventricular dysfunction, or other symptoms, or any combination of the above.
7. At least one episode of persistent AF must have been documented by ECG, Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, trans telephonic monitoring (TTM), or implantable device within last 2 years of enrollment in this investigation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with paroxysmal AF;
2. Paroxysmal AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting \< 7 days.
3. Patients with long-standing persistent AF;
4. Long-standing persistent AF will be defined as a sustained episode lasting more than 3 years;
5. Patients for whom cardioversion or sinus rhythm will never be attempted/pursued;
6. Patients with AF felt to be secondary to an obvious reversible cause;
7. Patients with contraindications to systemic anticoagulation with heparin or warfarin or a direct thrombin inhibitor;
8. Patients with left atrial size ≥ 60 mm (2D echocardiography, parasternal long axis view);
9. Patients with more than 50% renal artery stenosis identified by duplex ultrasound or renal angiogram;
10. Patients in whom a renal stent has been in place for less than3 months;
11. Patients with prior renal artery stent placement, the artery segment beyond the stent margins must be able to accommodate treatments;
12. Patients with the treatment zone for denervation in the renal artery have areas of atheroma, severe fibromuscular dysplasia, calcification, and aneurysm that cannot be avoided;
13. Patients with renal dysfunction as demonstrated by an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 mL/min per 1.73 m2 are excluded from both studies;
14. Pregnant women;
15. Participation in another interventional study;
16. Patient with contraindication to left ventricle catheterization by a retrograde aortic approach (eg mechanical aortic valve, severe aortic stenosis and aortic dissection).
17. Patient with systolic blood pressure \<100mmHg.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Chinese University of Hong Kong

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Professor Bryan Ping Yen YAN

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bryan Ping Yen YAN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Chinese University of Hong Kong

Hong Kong, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Hong Kong

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CUHK-CARD-2017-RND

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id