Trial Outcomes & Findings for Infrared and Broadband Light for Skin Aging (NCT NCT03243981)
NCT ID: NCT03243981
Last Updated: 2019-10-01
Results Overview
The endpoint consisted of clinical inspection of biopsies of untreated skin and skin after three treatments. Genes were considered altered if a statistically significant change in transcription of an individual gene was observed between the treated and untreated skin (significance was set at p\<0.01, adjusted for false discovery rate). The values in the table represent the total number of recorded genes with significant change.
COMPLETED
NA
5 participants
16 weeks
2019-10-01
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Skintyte
All patients will receive Skintyte treatment as well as Skintyte plus broadband light using the Sciton SkinTyte device.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Infrared and Broadband Light for Skin Aging
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Skintyte
n=5 Participants
All patients will receive Skintyte treatment as well as Skintyte plus broadband light using the Sciton SkinTyte device.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 16 weeksThe endpoint consisted of clinical inspection of biopsies of untreated skin and skin after three treatments. Genes were considered altered if a statistically significant change in transcription of an individual gene was observed between the treated and untreated skin (significance was set at p\<0.01, adjusted for false discovery rate). The values in the table represent the total number of recorded genes with significant change.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BBL + SPL590 vs Untreated
n=5 Participants
Biopsies were collected from the BBL + SPL590-treated arm (proximal forearm) and the untreated arm (mid-forearm)
BBL = broadband light; SPL = sequentially pulsed light
|
SPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
n=5 Participants
Biopsies were collected fro the SPL800-treated arm (distal forearm) vs untreated arm (mid-forearm)
SPL800 = SkinTite 2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Genes With Significant Change in Gene Transcription
|
188 genes
|
45 genes
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Participants that had assessments at baseline and day 84 are included in the analysis
Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BBL + SPL590 vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected from the BBL + SPL590-treated arm (proximal forearm) and the untreated arm (mid-forearm)
BBL = broadband light; SPL = sequentially pulsed light
|
SPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected fro the SPL800-treated arm (distal forearm) vs untreated arm (mid-forearm)
SPL800 = SkinTite 2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Fine Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Baseline
|
7.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Fine Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Day 84
|
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.46
|
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.20
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Participants that had assessments at baseline and day 84 are included in the analysis
Wrinkling was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more wrinkling.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BBL + SPL590 vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected from the BBL + SPL590-treated arm (proximal forearm) and the untreated arm (mid-forearm)
BBL = broadband light; SPL = sequentially pulsed light
|
SPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected fro the SPL800-treated arm (distal forearm) vs untreated arm (mid-forearm)
SPL800 = SkinTite 2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Coarse Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Baseline
|
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.65
|
6.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Coarse Wrinkling Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Day 84
|
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.63
|
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Participants that had assessments at baseline and day 84 are included in the analysis
Sagging was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more sagging.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BBL + SPL590 vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected from the BBL + SPL590-treated arm (proximal forearm) and the untreated arm (mid-forearm)
BBL = broadband light; SPL = sequentially pulsed light
|
SPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected fro the SPL800-treated arm (distal forearm) vs untreated arm (mid-forearm)
SPL800 = SkinTite 2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Sagging Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Baseline
|
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
|
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.91
|
|
Change From Baseline in Sagging Score as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Day 84
|
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.73
|
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Participants that had assessments at baseline and day 84 are included in the analysis
Physician global assessment was assessed on a 10 point Likert scale (range 1-10); higher scores correspond to more severe skin aging.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
BBL + SPL590 vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected from the BBL + SPL590-treated arm (proximal forearm) and the untreated arm (mid-forearm)
BBL = broadband light; SPL = sequentially pulsed light
|
SPL800 (SkinTite 2) vs Untreated
n=4 Participants
Biopsies were collected fro the SPL800-treated arm (distal forearm) vs untreated arm (mid-forearm)
SPL800 = SkinTite 2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Day 84
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
6.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment as a Measure of Skin Rejuvenation
Baseline
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.50
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Data were not collected for this outcome
Elasticity of skin assessment with cutometric probe.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, day 84Population: Data were not collected for this outcome
Transepidermal water loss assessment with VapoMeter.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
BBL + SPL590
SPL800
Untreated
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place