Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
254 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-11-07
2019-09-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Consent and Survey Procedures for Young MSM in Web-based HIV Prevention
NCT02139566
Simplified Consent for HIV Vaccine Trials
NCT00105339
Factors Affecting Adherence to Anti-HIV Drug Regimens in Children and Adolescents
NCT00073424
Preventing Sexual Transmission of HIV With Anti-HIV Drugs
NCT00074581
Effectiveness of an Online Prevention Program in Reducing the Risk of STD Infection in Young Adults
NCT00255944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All study participants will attend a one-day study visit at their respective study site. Upon arrival, participants will complete a CASI that collects demographic, social, behavioral, and attitudinal measures. Next, participants will take part in a simulated consent process for two hypothetical trials modeled after ATN 113 and HPTN 077. Study procedures differ for adolescents and parents, so each group is described separately below:
Adolescent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will lead the participant through a simulated consent process consistent with their randomized consent condition. Then, the participant will complete a CASI assessing Willingness to Participate (WTP) and will work with research staff to complete the University of San Diego (UCSD) Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC).
Parent Participants: For each hypothetical trial, research staff will review the informed consent forms with the parent. The parent will complete a CASI with three vignettes that describe each of the three possible consent conditions. Parents will rate the acceptability of each vignette. Then, the participant will work with research staff to complete the UCSD Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC). Finally, the participant will answer a series of questions via CASI.
A subset of 6-8 adolescents and 6-8 parents per study site will complete a debriefing interview assessing adolescent and parent perspectives on the various consent conditions in greater depth, and to better understand the role of study features, family, and adolescent characteristics in willingness to participate/willingness to support the hypothetical research studies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Consent 2.0 has a crossover-like design for parents. Parents will provide feedback on all three consent conditions and for both hypothetical trials. The order in which the hypothetical trials are presented to parents will be determined using a randomized block design that is stratified by study site and the parent's adolescent's natal sex. The presentation order for the 3 consent condition vignettes for each hypothetical trial will be determined using a randomized block design. A subset of 6-8 parents by site will be selected for debriefing interview.
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adolescents: Consent Condition 1
Autonomous minor consent
Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Adolescents: Consent Condition 2
Adult permission required
Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Adolescents: Consent Condition 3
Parental permission required
Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
Parents: Consent Conditions 1-3
Autonomous minor consent, adult permission required, and parental permission required
Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Autonomous minor consent
Consent requirement where the participant is not required to get anyone's permission to participate in the trial.
Adult permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain an adult's permission to participate in the trial.
Parental permission required
Consent requirement where the participant is required to obtain their parent's permission to participate in the trial.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to read and speak English
* HIV status is negative or unknown
* Engaged in high-risk sexual activity in the last six months
* Able to read and speak English
* Parent or guardian of an adolescent who is between ages 14-17
* The parent/guardian's adolescent's HIV status is either negative or unknown
Exclusion Criteria
* Parent of a child already enrolled in the study
14 Years
17 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Indiana University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amelia Knopf
Assistance Professor, IU School of Nursing
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amy Knopf, PhD, MPH, RN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University School of Medicine
Matthew Psioda, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital Colorado/Univ of Colorado SOM
Aurora, Colorado, United States
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins University/SOM
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Knopf A, Draucker CB, Fortenberry JD, Ott MA, Arrington-Sanders R, Reirden D, Schneider J, Straub D, Ofner S, Bakoyannis G, Zimet G. Parental Engagement in Consent Processes for Enrollment in Biomedical HIV Prevention Trials: Implications for Minor Adolescents' Willingness to Participate. J Adolesc Health. 2023 May;72(5):703-711. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.11.241. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-0538
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.