Comparison of Artificial Intelligent Clinic and Normal Clinic

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

350 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-09

Study Completion Date

2018-05-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, the investigators provide participants≤14 years old the artificial intelligent clinic or normal clinic in the purpose of seeking out a better way to make a definite diagnosis with high efficiency and accuracy, and report a prospective, randomized controlled study aiming at comparison of artificial intelligent clinic and normal clinic for diagnosing congenital cataract.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Intelligent Cataract Screening With Portable Slit-lamp

NCT05204095

Catarct Screening Artificial Intelligence

UNKNOWN

Validation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Postoperative Management of Cataract Patients

NCT04138771

Cataract Postoperative Complications Artificial Intelligence

UNKNOWN NA

Validation of a Universal Cataract Intelligence Platform

NCT03623971

Cataract Artificial Intelligence

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Minimal Invasive Lens Surgery and Traditional Cataract Surgery

NCT03230799

Congenital Cataract

UNKNOWN NA

Congenital Cataract Morphological Classifications

NCT02748031

Congenital Cataract

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children ≤14 years old from ophthalmic clinic without treatment were enrolled to a prospective, randomized controlled study. Patients were assigned to two groups: participants in group A went to the artificial intelligent clinic and get the initial diagnosis, while in Group B, the participants went to the normal clinic. Investigators provide the final definite diagnosis from experts for two groups. Investigators compared the accuracy of the diagnosis, time consuming and the satisfaction level between two groups, aiming at comparison of artificial intelligent clinic and normal clinic for diagnosing congenital cataract.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cataract

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Slit-lamp photography and patient recruitment will be performed in each participating clinic by trained clinical staffs. The clinical staffs, investigators involved in data management and analysis, and experts providing the gold standard diagnosis by consensus in each clinic will be blinded to the group assignment. The study participants, the coordinator, senior consultants, and study personnel responsible for randomisation will not be masked.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

artificial intelligent clinic

Procedure: the initial diagnosis from artificial intelligent clinic Participants in group A assigned to artificial intelligent clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

Procedure: the final definite diagnosis from experts After making the initial diagnosis in artificial intelligent clinic, participants in group A went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

artificial intelligent clinic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants in group A assigned to artificial intelligent clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

experts diagnose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After making the initial diagnosis, participants went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

normal clinic

Procedure: the initial diagnosis from normal clinic Participants in group B assigned to normal clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

Procedure: the final definite diagnosis from experts After making the initial diagnosis in normal clinic, participants in group B went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

normal clinic

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants in group B assigned to normal clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

experts diagnose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

After making the initial diagnosis, participants went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

artificial intelligent clinic

Participants in group A assigned to artificial intelligent clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

normal clinic

Participants in group B assigned to normal clinic to get the initial diagnosis after the eye examinations, including images of ocular anterior segment.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

experts diagnose

After making the initial diagnosis, participants went to get the final definite diagnosis from experts with more than 10 years of clinical experience.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Paediatric patients from collaborating eye clinics Written informed consents provided

Exclusion Criteria

* Definitive diagnosis of cataract or other ocular abnormalities Previous eye surgery Can not cooperate with the slip lamp examination Unwilling to participate in this trail

Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes