Compare the Aesthetic Effect of Different Thyroidectomies

NCT ID: NCT03239769

Last Updated: 2017-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-01

Study Completion Date

2015-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

One hundred twenty female patients who underwent thyroidectomy were evenly distributed into three groups: conventional access (CA), aesthetic principles access (APA) and minimally invasive access (MIA). The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used as the assessment tool for the linear scar. After one year follow-up, the cosmetic outcomes were assessed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective study in patients with DTC at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery at Perking University Cancer Hospital (also called Beijing Cancer hospital). A total of 120 female patients who underwent surgical treatment for DTC were enrolled in the study from June 2012 to June 2014. All patients were diagnosed with DTC through preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy pathology. These patients were individually randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) into the conventional access group (CA), the aesthetic principles access group (APA) or the minimally invasive access group (MIA). Lobectomy plus ipsilateral central lymph node dissection (CLND) was adopted in each patient. DTC staging was T1N0M0 or T1N1M0. The investigators retrieved the patients' information, including age, incision length, incision closure procedure, incidence of complications, and cosmetic assessment from patients' medical records. Patients with other medical diseases, such as diabetes or obesity, a smoking history, a keloid tendency, a history of radiotherapy to the head and neck, or with incomplete information, were excluded. RLN function was evaluated by electronic fiber laryngoscopy 6 months postoperatively. The follow-up time was 12.3 months. The research was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Cancer Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from all patients to publish the information/image(s) in an online open-access publication. The study was open-label with no blinding of patients, clinicians, or research staff.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (DTC)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

These patients were individually randomly assigned (1:1:1 ratio) into the conventional access group (CA), the aesthetic principles access group (APA) or the minimally invasive access group (MIA).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional access group (CA)

A 4- to 5-cm incision was created, subplatysmal flaps were raised, and the strap muscles were mobilized. Then, the superior pole of the thyroid gland was exposed and the gland was delivered through the surgical incision, and the thyroid isthmus was divided. Finally, CLND was performed. The strap muscles were re-approximated with No.1 silk suture. The full-thickness skin was closed with interrupted monofilament.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

thyroidectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thyroidectomies have different approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aesthetic effects of different access procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

aesthetic principles access group (APA)

The key difference focused on the disposal incision using aesthetic principles, which are depicted below. The incision was protected by Vaseline ointment. Excessive skin traction was avoided to prevent the injury on the skin edge. Bleeding was stanched with a low-power bipolar coagulation device. The surgical field does not have to be pulled in every direction to show the full operation field. The cervical linea alba was closed by continuous sutures with 3-0 absorbable Vicryl sutures. Interrupted sutures of 4-0 Vicryl were used to re-approximate the subcutaneous tissues. The epidermis was fixed with 3M steri-strip elastic skin closures rather than skin sutures.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

thyroidectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thyroidectomies have different approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aesthetic effects of different access procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

minimally invasive access group (MIA)

With the MIA approach, a shorter incision of between 3 and 4 cm was created. The procedure used the Harmonic scalpel as an auxiliary device. First, the isthmus was divided. Second, the lower pole of the thyroid was dissected from the adipose tissue, and the inferior thyroid vessels were divided close to the thyroid gland for mobilization. The RLN and parathyroid glands were carefully dissected. Third, the superior pole of the thyroid gland was disconnected. Finally, CLND was performed. The closure procedure for the incision was similar to that for APA.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

thyroidectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thyroidectomies have different approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aesthetic effects of different access procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

thyroidectomy

Thyroidectomies have different approaches. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the aesthetic effects of different access procedures in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients diagnosed with DTC through preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsy pathology.
* DTC staging was T1N0M0 or T1N1M0.
* Female
* Age over 18 years
* Subjects who fully understand the study process, participate voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with other medical diseases, such as diabetes or obesity, a smoking history, a keloid tendency, a history of radiotherapy to the head and neck, or with incomplete information.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Xiao Ma

Associate chief physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Xiao Ma, Doctor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ma X, Xia QJ, Li G, Wang TX, Li Q. Aesthetic principles access thyroidectomy produces the best cosmetic outcomes as assessed using the patient and observer scar assessment scale. BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):654. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3645-2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28923027 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

XMa-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.