Walk on: A Community-based Approach to Increase Physical Activity Among Men Treated for Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03232814
Last Updated: 2018-09-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-05
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Group-based physical activity programs are one of the varied services and programs available to adults diagnosed with cancer in Ottawa. Such programs are offered through the Ottawa Regional Cancer Foundation (http://www.ottawacancer.ca) and Breast Cancer Action Ottawa (http://bcaott.ca). Research on these programs show that group-based physical activity can improve disease and treatment-related effects while promoting overall quality of life amongst women with cancer. However, few of these programs have targeted men, even though their needs and preferences have been shown to be very different from women. While men diagnosed with colorectal cancer might also benefit from group-based physical activity programs offered in the community, it is not known if such programs would effectively reach them and what the impact would be on their quality of life after cancer treatment.
It is believed that a men's group-based walking program could be an effective way to reach men and promote quality of life after cancer treatment. Therefore, a sustainable 8-week group-based walking program was developed. This project will seek to explore the feasibility and potential benefits of the program among men who have completed treatment for colorectal cancer and who are referred to the program from staff at the Wellness Beyond Cancer Program in a prospective single-arm trial.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Feasibility of an Active Lifestyle Programme in Patients Recovering From Colorectal Cancer
NCT02751892
Reducing Sedentary Behaviors Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors
NCT02442583
Views on Cancer Prevention and Daily Lifestyle
NCT03575117
Aerobic Capacity and Body Composition in Colon Cancer Patients
NCT00470782
Pedometer Intervention and Health Effects for Sedentary Colorectal Cancer Patients During Adjuvant Chemotherapy
NCT02522520
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group-based walking
Participants will engage in one supervised outdoor group-based walking session per week for the 8 week program.
Group-based walking
The walking prescription will be progressive in nature. The program will begin with participants walking for approximately 20 minutes in weeks 1-3. This will gradually increase to approximately 30 minutes in weeks 4-6. Finally, this will increase to 45-60 minutes in weeks 7-8. The program will promote walking at a moderate intensity as assessed by Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion scale. Each session will be preceded by a brief warm-up and followed by a brief cool-down period.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group-based walking
The walking prescription will be progressive in nature. The program will begin with participants walking for approximately 20 minutes in weeks 1-3. This will gradually increase to approximately 30 minutes in weeks 4-6. Finally, this will increase to 45-60 minutes in weeks 7-8. The program will promote walking at a moderate intensity as assessed by Borg's Rating of Perceived Exertion scale. Each session will be preceded by a brief warm-up and followed by a brief cool-down period.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have completed treatment for colorectal cancer \<1 year;
3. Willing to provide informed consent to participate in this study and willing to follow the study protocol;
4. Have the ability to walk without the use of an assistive device (including a cane) or the help of another person;
5. Able to read and understand English;
6. Medically cleared to participate in the walking program as determined by their referring Wellness Beyond Cancer Program healthcare provider.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure\>200 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure \>110 mm Hg);
3. The use of supplemental oxygen;
4. Severe arthritis (i.e., osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis);
5. History of chest pain or severe shortness of breath either at rest or when engaging in physical activity;
6. Hip fracture, hip or knee replacement in the past 6 months;
7. Currently enrolled in another study involving a physical activity intervention.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ottawa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jennifer Brunet
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Brunet, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Ottawa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Smith C, Tien A, Ybarra M. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R), in The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment, M.E. Maruish, Editor. 2004, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ. p. 363-377.
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
Marsh HW, Martin AJ, Jackson S. Introducing a short version of the physical self description questionnaire: new strategies, short-form evaluative criteria, and applications of factor analyses. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2010 Aug;32(4):438-82. doi: 10.1123/jsep.32.4.438.
Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1977. 1: p. 385-401.
Wagner L, Lai J-S, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S. Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med, 2004. 27: p. S10.
Ward WL, Hahn EA, Mo F, Hernandez L, Tulsky DS, Cella D. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument. Qual Life Res. 1999 May;8(3):181-95. doi: 10.1023/a:1008821826499.
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.
Wilson PM, Bengoechea EG. The relatedness to others in physical activity scale: evidence for structural and criterion validity. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 2010. 15(2): p. 61-87.
Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
Yost KJ, Cella D, Chawla A, Holmgren E, Eton DT, Ayanian JZ, West DW. Minimally important differences were estimated for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) instrument using a combination of distribution- and anchor-based approaches. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1241-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Oct 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WBCP:PA/CR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.