Effects of Early Skull Repair With Titanium Mesh on Cerebral Blood Flow and Neurological Recovery

NCT ID: NCT03222297

Last Updated: 2018-02-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 86 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-01-01
• Study Completion Date: 2017-12-31

Brief Summary

To evaluate the feasibility of CT perfusion technique to monitor the changes of blood perfusion in the brain tissue before and after skull repair using titanium mesh. To determine the best timing for skull repair using the three-dimensional titanium mesh; to compare the effects of early (1-3 months after decompression) and late-stage (6-12 months after decompression) skull repair on neurologic rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

A skull defect is inevitable in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing decompression treatment, which results in a loss of physiological and functional integrity of the brain that makes atmospheric pressure directly act on the brain tissue to induce environmental disorders in the brain. Moreover, with the changes in the body position, the contents of the brain often move in an unstable position, and with the extension of time, there may be compensatory ventricular enlargement and brain atrophy, eventually causing neurological dysfunction and cognitive disorders. Therefore, it is imperative to repair the skull defect.

There are many repair materials for skull defects, including autogenous bone, allogeneic bone, nonmetallic materials (plexiglass, bone cement, silicone rubber, etc.) and titanium mesh. The performance of different materials have their own advantages and disadvantages, and titanium alloy is an ideal repair material and has been widely used in clinical practice because of good biocompatibility and strength, no aging, low density, non-iron atoms, ability to be not magnetized in magnetic fields, and no influence on CT, MRI, EEG and X-ray examination.

The timing for repair of skull defect after traumatic brain injury is still controversial. Some scholars believe that if there is no hydrocephalus and intracranial infection after decompression with removal of bone flap, skull repair should be proceeded as soon as possible to isolate the scalp from the dura mater and recover the normal intracranial pressure by easing the negative effects of the scalp, such as cerebrovascular traction, compression and distortions. Most importantly, early skull repair is able to reduce a variety of secondary neurological deficits due to skull defects, increase brain surface blood flow, and thus reduce epileptic attack. Of course, some scholars recommend late-stage skull repair, and they believe hematoma absorption after decompressive surgery is a long process, and in some patients, hematoma will be completely absorbed in about 3 months or even longer, which may result in secondary brain edema. Moreover, surgical trauma exerts negative effect on the brain tissue recovery, which is not conducive to neurologic rehabilitation.

As there is no unified conclusion on the timing for the repair of skull defects, investigators conducted a multi-sample, double-blind, randomized, clinical trial, to collect craniocerebral injury patients undergoing decompression with removal of bone graft who were randomized into two groups to receive early skull repair in test group and late-stage skull repair in control group. CT perfusion technology was used to monitor the blood perfusion in the brain before and after skull repair and to compare the changes of blood perfusion in the brain tissue and neurological recovery in patients undergoing early or late-stage skull repair.

Conditions

Traumatic Brain Injury

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: CASE_CONTROL
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

test group

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into test group (n = 40) with early skull repair using titanium mesh within 1-3 months after decompression.

early skull repair

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into test group (n = 40) with early skull repair using titanium mesh within 1-3 months after decompression.

control group

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into control group (n = 46) with late-stage skull repair using titanium mesh within 6-12 months after decompression.

late-stage skull repair

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into control group (n = 46) with late-stage skull repair using titanium mesh within 6-12 months after decompression.

Interventions

early skull repair

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into test group (n = 40) with early skull repair using titanium mesh within 1-3 months after decompression.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

late-stage skull repair

Patients with craniocerebral injury were randomized into control group (n = 46) with late-stage skull repair using titanium mesh within 6-12 months after decompression.

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

test group; control group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients underwent decompression via removal of bone flap in the unilateral frontal temporal lobe due to craniocerebral injury and developed no postoperative infection.
• Patients agreed to receive skull repair using titanium mesh.
• Patients and their families agreed to receive CT perfusion examination.
• Patients and their families fully understood the study protocol and agreed to participate in the trial, and then singed the informed consent before the trial.

Exclusion Criteria

• Hypertension and diabetes out of control, severe heart disease, brain tumors, brain abscess, and cerebral infarction
• Diseases that have interfered with localized perfusion data, such as intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations
• Combined with depressed skull fractures and skull base fractures
• Hydrocephalus

• Minimum Eligible Age: 20 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Taihe Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Yase Zhuang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

TaiheH_002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id