Does "Kinesio-taping" Affect Balance in Healthy Individuals?

NCT ID: NCT03219905

Last Updated: 2017-07-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Kinesio-taping (KT) has recently gained so much popularity and a growing number of physicians started using it to alleviate musculoskeletal symptoms. It was originally developed by Kenzo Kase in 1976. The effects of KT on ankle proprioception and stability have been investigated in previous studies. However, these studies are limited and the current data is conflicting. Repeated application of KT in a patient with chronic ankle instability has been shown to be effective in improving balance. In basketball players with chronic ankle sprain, KT did not improve or inhibit balance. Application of KT did not cause a significant change in balance of healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and short-term effects of KT on balance of healthy subjects.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Thirty male healthy volunteers (between 18-40 ages) were screened for eligibility by physical examination and history. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment. The research proposal was reviewed and approved by the Faculty Ethics Committee(No: 05-213-14).

This is a randomized sham controlled, double-blind pilot clinical trial. The block randomization method with a block size of 4 was used in order to allocate the subjects equally into two groups; Kinesiotaping (KT) and sham (control).To conceal the randomization sequence an independent researcher (HG) who is unaware of the baseline data carried out the procedure using a computer software. The researcher (MO) who was blinded to the allocationprocedure did the balance testing of all subjects, before (t0), immediately after (t1) and 24 hours after the application of KT (T2). The subjects were also blinded to the type of intervention.

Standard 2-inch (5-cm) Kinesio® Tex (Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM) Tape was used for all applications in both groups. A certified KT practitioner (BST) did the all taping procedures. KT was applied bilaterally to the ankle joints. To ensure blinding of the assessor (MÖ), taping procedure was done in a separate room and subjects wore their socks after the application. The tape remained in place for 24 hours duration and subjects were instructed to participate in their normal daily activities, except shower.

The experimental group received a standardized therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees. KT was applied according to the procedures recommended by the website of http://www.kttapeeurope.com/How-to-tape-Ankle-Stability (last accessed on July 7th, 2017). First strip was anchored 5 cm above the ankle. Then tape was applied down the outer ankle, across the bottom of the heel, and up the inner side of the ankle. The last 5cm of tape was laid without stretch. Second strip was anchored along the instep of the foot. Then tape was laid around the back of the heel and across the arch with 50% stretch. The last part of tape was laid down without stretch on inside of foot. Third strip was anchored same style along the outside of the foot. The tape was laid the around the back of the heel and across the arch with 50% stretch. The last 5 cm of the tape was laid down without stretch on insideof foot. The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.

Each participant's height and weight were recorded and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Balance measurements were made with a stabilometer, BiodexTM Balance System. A dynamic postural stability test was performed in a double-leg standing position with eyes open. Each test included three trials that lasted 20 seconds with a 10-second rest period between them. A mean score was calculated from three trials. Subjects were given a practice trial lasting 20 sec. to familiarize with the test. During the dynamic postural stability test three indices were calculated; (1) anteroposterior stability index (APSI), (2) mediolateral stability index (MLSI), (3) overall stability index (OSI). The OSI indicates the total variation in plate deviation (sway) from the horizontal plane. The APSI and MLSI indicate the deviation of the plate (sway) from the horizontal position in the sagittal and frontal planes, respectively. Since the values obtained during measurements indicate the amount of sway from the horizontal position, lower scores show better balance.

Non-parametric tests have been used due to the small sample size and skewed data distribution. The baseline demographic characteristics of the patients in each group were compared by Mann Whitney U test. The two-way mixed ANOVA was used to compare the mean differences between independent groups over time and to understand if there is an interaction between time and group factors.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Balance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Kinesio-taping Group

Therapeutic Kinesio-taping

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Therapeutic Kinesio-taping

Intervention Type DEVICE

The experimental group received a therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees.

Control Group

Sham Kinesio-taping

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Kinesio-taping

Intervention Type DEVICE

The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Therapeutic Kinesio-taping

The experimental group received a therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Kinesio-taping

The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy male volunteers
* Age between 18-40 years
* polyneuropathy or neurological deficits

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals with;

* lower extremity fractures
* knee or ankle ligamentous injury
* conditions affecting balance, knee, hip or spinal osteoarthritis
* lower extremity or back surgery
* polyneuropathy or neurological deficits
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Haydar Gok

Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Haydar Gok, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ankara University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Kline KJ, Borsa PA. Gender and limb differences in dynamic postural stability during landing. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Jul;16(4):311-5. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200607000-00005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16858214 (View on PubMed)

Gabriel RC, Abrantes J, Granata K, Bulas-Cruz J, Melo-Pinto P, Filipe V. Dynamic joint stiffness of the ankle during walking: gender-related differences. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19083700 (View on PubMed)

Akbari A, Sarmadi A, Zafardanesh P. The effect of ankle taping and balance exercises on postural stability indices in healthy women. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):763-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.763. Epub 2014 May 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24926148 (View on PubMed)

Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Molinari M. Somatosensory inputs by application of KinesioTaping: effects on spasticity, balance, and gait in chronic spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 30;8:367. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00367. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24910607 (View on PubMed)

Cortesi M, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J. Effect of kinesio taping on standing balance in subjects with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study\m1. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(4):365-72. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0665.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21725170 (View on PubMed)

Kinzey SJ, Ingersoll CD, Knight KL. The effects of selected ankle appliances on postural control. J Athl Train. 1997 Oct;32(4):300-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16558462 (View on PubMed)

Nunes GS, de Noronha M, Cunha HS, Ruschel C, Borges NG Jr. Effect of kinesio taping on jumping and balance in athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):3183-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828a2c17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23439339 (View on PubMed)

Shields CA, Needle AR, Rose WC, Swanik CB, Kaminski TW. Effect of elastic taping on postural control deficits in subjects with healthy ankles, copers, and individuals with functional ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1427-35. doi: 10.1177/1071100713491076. Epub 2013 May 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23720530 (View on PubMed)

Nakajima MA, Baldridge C. The effect of kinesio(R) tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Aug;8(4):393-406.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24175126 (View on PubMed)

You SH, Granata KP, Bunker LK. Effects of circumferential ankle pressure on ankle proprioception, stiffness, and postural stability: a preliminary investigation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Aug;34(8):449-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.8.449.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15373008 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

05-213-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TENS and Taping for Older People
NCT05596110 UNKNOWN NA