Does "Kinesio-taping" Affect Balance in Healthy Individuals?
NCT ID: NCT03219905
Last Updated: 2017-07-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-04-30
2014-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Kinesio Taping Effects on Balance and Ankle Proprioception
NCT06832111
The Acute Effect of Kinesio Taping on Balance and Proprioception
NCT06965348
Effect of Kinesiotaping on Elbow Joint Proprioception
NCT05265780
Effect of Different Kinesio Band Applications on Balance, Ankle Function and Jump
NCT06901141
Kinesio Taping for the Knee and Ankle: Acute Impact on Balance, Proprioception, and ACL Risk
NCT07138573
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a randomized sham controlled, double-blind pilot clinical trial. The block randomization method with a block size of 4 was used in order to allocate the subjects equally into two groups; Kinesiotaping (KT) and sham (control).To conceal the randomization sequence an independent researcher (HG) who is unaware of the baseline data carried out the procedure using a computer software. The researcher (MO) who was blinded to the allocationprocedure did the balance testing of all subjects, before (t0), immediately after (t1) and 24 hours after the application of KT (T2). The subjects were also blinded to the type of intervention.
Standard 2-inch (5-cm) Kinesio® Tex (Kinesio Holding Corporation, Albuquerque, NM) Tape was used for all applications in both groups. A certified KT practitioner (BST) did the all taping procedures. KT was applied bilaterally to the ankle joints. To ensure blinding of the assessor (MÖ), taping procedure was done in a separate room and subjects wore their socks after the application. The tape remained in place for 24 hours duration and subjects were instructed to participate in their normal daily activities, except shower.
The experimental group received a standardized therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees. KT was applied according to the procedures recommended by the website of http://www.kttapeeurope.com/How-to-tape-Ankle-Stability (last accessed on July 7th, 2017). First strip was anchored 5 cm above the ankle. Then tape was applied down the outer ankle, across the bottom of the heel, and up the inner side of the ankle. The last 5cm of tape was laid without stretch. Second strip was anchored along the instep of the foot. Then tape was laid around the back of the heel and across the arch with 50% stretch. The last part of tape was laid down without stretch on inside of foot. Third strip was anchored same style along the outside of the foot. The tape was laid the around the back of the heel and across the arch with 50% stretch. The last 5 cm of the tape was laid down without stretch on insideof foot. The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.
Each participant's height and weight were recorded and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. Balance measurements were made with a stabilometer, BiodexTM Balance System. A dynamic postural stability test was performed in a double-leg standing position with eyes open. Each test included three trials that lasted 20 seconds with a 10-second rest period between them. A mean score was calculated from three trials. Subjects were given a practice trial lasting 20 sec. to familiarize with the test. During the dynamic postural stability test three indices were calculated; (1) anteroposterior stability index (APSI), (2) mediolateral stability index (MLSI), (3) overall stability index (OSI). The OSI indicates the total variation in plate deviation (sway) from the horizontal plane. The APSI and MLSI indicate the deviation of the plate (sway) from the horizontal position in the sagittal and frontal planes, respectively. Since the values obtained during measurements indicate the amount of sway from the horizontal position, lower scores show better balance.
Non-parametric tests have been used due to the small sample size and skewed data distribution. The baseline demographic characteristics of the patients in each group were compared by Mann Whitney U test. The two-way mixed ANOVA was used to compare the mean differences between independent groups over time and to understand if there is an interaction between time and group factors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Kinesio-taping Group
Therapeutic Kinesio-taping
Therapeutic Kinesio-taping
The experimental group received a therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees.
Control Group
Sham Kinesio-taping
Sham Kinesio-taping
The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Therapeutic Kinesio-taping
The experimental group received a therapeutic Kinesio Tape application. Three "I" strips were applied to the both ankle joints for joint stability with subject's ankle at 90 degrees.
Sham Kinesio-taping
The control group received a sham Kinesio Tape application. Ankle position was hold at minimally plantar flexion during taping. A"I" strip was placed from the anterior midfoot, not stretched and attached to the midline of anterior leg.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18-40 years
* polyneuropathy or neurological deficits
Exclusion Criteria
* lower extremity fractures
* knee or ankle ligamentous injury
* conditions affecting balance, knee, hip or spinal osteoarthritis
* lower extremity or back surgery
* polyneuropathy or neurological deficits
18 Years
40 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Haydar Gok
Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Haydar Gok, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ankara University
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wikstrom EA, Tillman MD, Kline KJ, Borsa PA. Gender and limb differences in dynamic postural stability during landing. Clin J Sport Med. 2006 Jul;16(4):311-5. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200607000-00005.
Gabriel RC, Abrantes J, Granata K, Bulas-Cruz J, Melo-Pinto P, Filipe V. Dynamic joint stiffness of the ankle during walking: gender-related differences. Phys Ther Sport. 2008 Feb;9(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 29.
Akbari A, Sarmadi A, Zafardanesh P. The effect of ankle taping and balance exercises on postural stability indices in healthy women. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 May;26(5):763-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.763. Epub 2014 May 29.
Tamburella F, Scivoletto G, Molinari M. Somatosensory inputs by application of KinesioTaping: effects on spasticity, balance, and gait in chronic spinal cord injury. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 May 30;8:367. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00367. eCollection 2014.
Cortesi M, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J. Effect of kinesio taping on standing balance in subjects with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study\m1. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;28(4):365-72. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0665.
Kinzey SJ, Ingersoll CD, Knight KL. The effects of selected ankle appliances on postural control. J Athl Train. 1997 Oct;32(4):300-3.
Nunes GS, de Noronha M, Cunha HS, Ruschel C, Borges NG Jr. Effect of kinesio taping on jumping and balance in athletes: a crossover randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):3183-9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828a2c17.
Shields CA, Needle AR, Rose WC, Swanik CB, Kaminski TW. Effect of elastic taping on postural control deficits in subjects with healthy ankles, copers, and individuals with functional ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1427-35. doi: 10.1177/1071100713491076. Epub 2013 May 29.
Nakajima MA, Baldridge C. The effect of kinesio(R) tape on vertical jump and dynamic postural control. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Aug;8(4):393-406.
You SH, Granata KP, Bunker LK. Effects of circumferential ankle pressure on ankle proprioception, stiffness, and postural stability: a preliminary investigation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004 Aug;34(8):449-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.8.449.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
05-213-14
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.