Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis (NCT NCT03215277)
NCT ID: NCT03215277
Last Updated: 2023-07-27
Results Overview
ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP \[mg/L\] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
76 participants
From Baseline to Week 12
2023-07-27
Participant Flow
The study started to enroll study participants in October 2017 and concluded in May 2020.
The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set (RS).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol
Participants received certolizumab pegol (CZP) 400 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 12 to Week 44.
|
Bimekizumab
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
25
|
51
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
46
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol
Participants received certolizumab pegol (CZP) 400 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 12 to Week 44.
|
Bimekizumab
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant was unable to attend clinic visit
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Test the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab and Certolizumab Pegol in Patients With Active Ankylosing Spondylitis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol
n=25 Participants
Participants received certolizumab pegol (CZP) 400 milligrams (mg) subcutaneously (sc) every 2 weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 12 to Week 44.
|
Bimekizumab
n=51 Participants
Participants received bimekizumab (BKZ) 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4.
|
Total Title
n=76 Participants
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
47 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 • n=93 Participants
|
40.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5 • n=4 Participants
|
40.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
51 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 12Population: Per Protocol Set (PPS) consisted of all study participants in the Full Analysis Set who had no important protocol deviation affecting the primary efficacy variable. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP \[mg/L\] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score. The change from Baseline is calculated, a negative value indicating improvement and a positive value worsening. Posterior means and 95% credible intervals in each group are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=46 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) at Week 12
|
-1.83 scores on a scale
Interval -2.11 to -1.55
|
-2.06 scores on a scale
Interval -2.3 to -1.81
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)Population: Safety Set (SS) consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least 1 dose (full or partial) of the IMP.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=25 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=51 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) During the Study Conduct
|
19 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)Population: Safety Set (SS) consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least 1 dose (full or partial) of the IMP.
An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: - Resulted in death - Is life-threatening - Required in patient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation - Is a congenital anomaly or birth defect - Is an infection that requires treatment with parenteral antibiotics - Other important medical events which based on medical or scientific judgement may jeopardised the participants, or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the above. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=25 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=51 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) During the Study Conduct
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)Population: Safety Set (SS) consisted of all randomized study participants who received at least 1 dose (full or partial) of the IMP.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE could therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=25 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=51 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to an Adverse Event (AE) During the Study Conduct
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 12Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) consisted of all study participants in the Full Analysis Set who had no important protocol deviation affecting the primary efficacy variable. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
ASDAS-ID was defined by ASDAS \< 1.3. ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP \[mg/L\] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=46 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score - Inactive Disease (ASDAS-ID) at Week 12
|
5 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: Per-Protocol Set (PPS) consisted of all study participants in the Full Analysis Set who had no important protocol deviation affecting the primary efficacy variable. Here, Number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
ASDAS-MI was defined by a reduction (improvement) from Baseline in ASDAS \>=2 units. ASDAS was calculated as the sum of the results from the following components: 0.121xTotal spinal pain (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Question 2 result), 0.058xDuration of morning stiffness (BASDAI Question 6 result), 0.110xPGADA, 0.073xPeripheral pain/swelling (BASDAI Question 3 result), 0.579x(natural logarithm of the CRP \[mg/L\] + 1), Spinal pain, PGADA, duration of morning stiffness, peripheral pain/swelling were all assessed on a numerical scale (0 to 10 units). There is a minimum score of 0.980 for ASDAS (as a fixed value of 2 was assumed for values of hs-CRP below the LLOQ), but no defined upper score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (PPS)
n=24 Participants
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Per Protocol Set (PPS).
|
Bimekizumab (PPS)
n=46 Participants
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the PPS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-Major Improvement (ASDAS-MI) at Week 12
|
11 Participants
Interval 27.9 to 64.9
|
28 Participants
Interval 46.5 to 73.6
|
Adverse Events
Certolizumab Pegol (SS)
Bimekizumab (SS)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (SS)
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS).
|
Bimekizumab (SS)
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic arthritis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hand fracture
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb fracture
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myasthenia gravis
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Completed suicide
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (SS)
n=25 participants at risk
Participants received CZP 400 mg sc Q2W at Weeks 0, 2, and 4 (loading dose) followed by CZP 200 mg sc Q2W in Weeks 6 to 10 and 400 mg Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. Participants formed the Safety Set (SS).
|
Bimekizumab (SS)
n=51 participants at risk
Participants received BKZ 160 mg sc Q2W from Week 0 through Week 10 and 320 mg sc Q4W from Week 12 to Week 44. In addition, participants received placebo injection to maintain the blind for the CZP loading dose at Baseline, Week 2 and Week 4. Participants formed the SS.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
11.8%
6/51 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
24.0%
6/25 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
19.6%
10/51 • Number of events 12 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
9.8%
5/51 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
5.9%
3/51 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
2.0%
1/51 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Periarthritis
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
0.00%
0/51 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Ankylosing spondylitis
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
7.8%
4/51 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
3.9%
2/51 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until Safety Follow-Up Visit (up to Week 64)
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as any AE with a start date/time at the time of or after the first dose of IMP up until 140 days after the last dose of IMP.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60