Comparison Between Novel Flower-type Covered Stent and Conventional Covered Stent
NCT ID: NCT03215108
Last Updated: 2017-07-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
256 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-07-12
2019-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Fully Covered SEMS Versus Partially Covered SEMS With Anti-migration System for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
NCT02255669
Comparing Covered Self-expandable Metallic Stent (SEMS) Above/Across the Sphincter of Oddi
NCT01041612
Metal Versus Plastic Stent in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
NCT03857958
A Comparison of a Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stent With an External Anchoring Plastic Stent and Uncovered Stent
NCT05220475
Partially Covered and Uncovered Metal Stent for Malignant Distal Biliary Stricture
NCT02178618
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) having a five-petal-shaped design with side grooves was constructed to prevent the obstruction of the cystic duct orifice.
This study investigated the value of the F-CSEMS in protection for cholecystitis and pancreatitis.
The investigators will enroll patients with distal MBO (Malignant Biliary Obstruction) who received placement at the Samsung Medical Center. Transpapillary flower-type covered self-expandable metal stent (F-CSEMS) placements will be included in this study.
The diagnosis of MBO will be based on imaging and/or pathological findings. Malignancy was proved by histopathological confirmation obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA), bile duct biopsy (cytology), pancreatic duct cytology, or liver biopsy.
The investigators will evaluate the frequency of pancreatitis and cholecystitis.
Furthermore, the investigators will evaluate various parameters to clarify the predictive factors of pancreatitis and cholecystitis. The following 10 variables will be evaluated in pancreatitis by univariate analysis: \[1\] sex, \[2\] age, \[3\] primary disease, \[4\] Covered type (partially or fully), \[5\] SEMS with high AF, \[6\] F-CSEMS with high RF, \[7\] EST before F-CSEMS, \[8\] previous biliary stent, \[9\] contrast injection into the pancreatic duct (pancreatogram), and \[10\] the position of the distal stent edge.
The following 11 variables will be evaluated in cholecystitis by univariate analysis: \[1\] sex, \[2\] age, \[3\] regions of stricture, \[4\] F-CSEMS with high AF AF (axial force), \[5\] F-CSEMS with high RF, \[6\] previous biliary stent, \[7\] gallbladder stone, \[8\] contrast injection into the gallbladder (GB injection), \[9\] involvement to the orifice of the cystic duct (OCD), \[10\] position of distal stent edge, and \[11\] cystic duct occlusion by F-CSEMS.
\--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
software: nQuery + nTerim (version 4.0)
\- One-sided Chi-square test for proportion comparison
H0: p1=p2 vs H1: p1\>p2 (The incidence of complications in the flower-type covered stent is smaller than in the conventional stent.)
p1 = incident rate of complication in full covered stent group p2 = incident rate of complication in flower-type covered stent group
* Set p1(incident rate of complication in full covered stent group) = 15% = 0.15
* expected % decrement in incidence rate = 40%, 50%, 60%, 70% --\> p2 = 0.09, 0.075, 0.06, 0.045
* Significance level (alpha) = 0.05
* Maximum number of patients who can be enrolled = 10 per month at SMC = 120 per year
* Expected enroll period = 1 year = 12 months
1. Sample size calculation with targeted power of 80% Expected % decrement in incidence rate 70% p2 4.5% Required n per group 116 Required total sample size 232 Required enroll period (year) 1.9
2. Power calculation with a total sample size of 232 (116 per group) Expected % decrement in incidence rate 40% 50% 60% 70% p2 9.0% 7.5% 6.0% 4.5% Expected power (%) 32 48 64 80
3. Minimum % decrement to be detected with power of 80% Planned enroll period (year) 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Enroll-able n per group 60 90 120 150 180 Enroll-able total sample size 120 180 240 300 360 Minimum % decrement to be detected 93.33% 78.70% 68.70% 62.70% 58.00% Expected p2 1.0% 3.2% 4.7% 5.6% 6.3%
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Flower-CSEMS
EGIS Flower Biliary Full Covered Stent(Flower-CSEMS), Bile Duct Stent, (S \& G Biotech Co., Ltd.) will be inserted by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)
This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Conventional-CSEMS
Conventional-CSEMS (S \& G Biotech Co., Ltd.) will be inserted by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)
This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP)
This study is prospective randomized multicenter study by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP). Comparison between Novel flower-type covered stent and Conventional covered stent in malignant extrahepatic biliary obstruction will be conducted after stent insertion by using Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography(ERCP).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with malignant extrahepatic bile duct obstruction without surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who previously underwent percutaneous spinal cholecystectomy (PTGBD)
* Patients who underwent conventional metal-on-metal self-expandable metal stents (C-CSEMS)
* Patients who underwent biliary plastic stent implantation for more than 15 days
* Patients with malignant stricture of the intrahepatic bile duct and patients with stenosis within 2 cm of the liver
* Patients whose expected life expectancy is less than 3 months
* Pregnant patient
* Patients who can not undergo endoscopic procedures based on the judgment of the researcher
19 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jong Kyun Lee, MD PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Samsung Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
SamsungMC
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-03-098-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.