Dexmedetomidine Infusion as an Analgesic Adjuvant During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT03211871

Last Updated: 2017-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-01

Study Completion Date

2017-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dexmedetomidine provide sedative, sympatholytic and analgesic effect, so it could be used as an adjuvant to improve analgesia, hemodynamic response to intubation and pneumoperitoneum, decrease the number of opioid-associated adverse effects.

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The randomized, single-center, controlled study was carried out from May 2016 to June 2017 at department of surgery, anesthesiology and intensive care, Postgraduate Institute of Bogomolets National Medical University. Study design was approved by Ethical Committee at Bogomolets National Medical University (approval code 56).

60 patients elected for LCE were included in the study. The inclusion criteria were: age between 18 and 79 years, either sex, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I to II. The exclusion criteria were age outside the specified range, pregnancy or lactation, severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status), patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers.

After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four. The randomization sequence was generated using a computer algorithm \[19\]. Randomization and data analysis were conducted by an independent blinded member of the research team.

Group D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation, group C (control) received normal saline infusion. To prepare the infusion, dexmedetomidine 2ml containing 100mcg of the drug was diluted up to 50 ml with normal saline resulting in final concentration of 4mcg/kg. Dexmedetomidine or normal saline infusion was given through infusion pump.

After taking the patient to the operation room, vital signs monitor Philips and Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring were attached (pulse, heart rate, electrocardiography (ECG), arterial pressure (AP), oxygen saturation). Peripheral intravenous cannula was inserted for intravenous fluids and infusion pump (separate line). Patients did not receive premedication. Before induction they receive dexketoprofen 50mg IV and omeprazole 40mg.

Pre-oxygenation was performed for 2 min, induction in anesthesia - with propofol 2mg/kg IV and succinyl choline 1,5mg/kg IV. After intubation anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and atracurium bromide. The patients were ventilated with circle system with goal CO2 35-45 mm Hg. BIS-monitor target was between 40 and 60. Anesthetics and drug infusion were stopped with the end of surgery.

The primary efficacy outcomes were number of patients with severe pain, time to first rescue analgesia and postoperative morphine consumption. Severe pain was estimated as VAS≥7 during 30% or more time in first 48 hours after surgery. Time to first rescue analgesia was estimated as time from end of anesthesia to the time postoperatively when patient ask for analgesia or have VAS≥4. Injection morphine hydrochlorides 10mg subcutaneously was used as a rescue analgesic. NSAIDs (dexketoprofen 150mg per day) were prescribed routinely.

Secondary efficacy outcomes included:

* Time from end of surgery to extubation
* Lengths of postanesthesia unit/general ward stay
* Incidence of chronic postoperative pain During first 48 hours after surgery patients in both groups were evaluated by the nursing stuff using the Richmond agitation sedation scale (RASS) for sedation, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment (every 2 hours or prior to rescue analgesia).

Safety was assessed by monitoring vital signs and recording adverse events. During anesthesia all patients receive continuous ECG, BIS, pulse oximetry, capnography monitoring. AP was measured every 3-5min. Arterial blood gases were checked by doctor prescription. An adverse event was recorded if systolic blood pressure was \<90 or \>160 mmHg or if heart rate was \<50 or \>110 beats/min; desaturation was estimated as peripheral oxygen saturation (or SaO2) \<90%. Interventions for bradycardia, tachycardia, hypertension and hypotension comprised titration or interruption of study agent, or additional drug therapy.

Statistical analysis was performed using R software. Categorical data are presented as proportions and continuous data as medians with 25-75% interquartile ranges (IQRs). Chi-square testing demonstrated that all of the study variables were discrete. To assess significance levels, a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test were used. A p-value of \<0.05 was considered significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

After the primary patient assessment, eligible participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention (Group D) or control (Group C) groups using random assignment in blocks of four.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group D

Group D received dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h from induction in anesthesia to extubation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dexmedetomidine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h

Croup C

group C (control) received normal saline infusion

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dexmedetomidine

Intraoperative intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion 0,5 mcg/kg/h

Intervention Type DRUG

Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#1

Intraoperative intravenous normal saline infusion

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients elected for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
* age between 18 and 79 years
* either sex
* ASA physical status I to II

Exclusion Criteria

* age outside the specified range
* pregnancy or lactation
* severe systemic disease (ASA III physical status or more)
* patients on b-blockers or calcium channel blockers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bogomolets National Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kateryna Bielka

assistant professor at Anesthesiology and intensive care Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kyiv Clinical City Hospital #1

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ukraine

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kateryna Bielka

Role: CONTACT

380936693931

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Iurii Kuchyn, Prof

Role: primary

380677275825

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Babych V, Martycshenko K, Inozemtsev O. Dexmedetomidine infusion as an analgesic adjuvant during laparoscopic small es, Cyrillicholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 20;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0508-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29678158 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

87678

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Dexamethasone-Enhanced TAP Block in Lapchole
NCT07182110 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1
Multimodal Analgesia for Cholecystectomy
NCT04788654 COMPLETED PHASE3
Nonopioid Analgesics and Cholecystectomy
NCT04622813 COMPLETED PHASE3
Intraoperative Lidocaine Infusion
NCT07150481 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
EOIB for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06656299 RECRUITING NA