Trial Outcomes & Findings for A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV (NCT NCT03210701)
NCT ID: NCT03210701
Last Updated: 2020-05-19
Results Overview
Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.
COMPLETED
NA
123 participants
Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
2020-05-19
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Study Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
34.8 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
93 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
28 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Trans person
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African, Caribbean or Black
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Indigenous
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada · Urban
|
112 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada · Rural
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Relationship status
Single
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Relationship status
Casually Dating
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Relationship status
Married, Common-Law or Committed
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Relationship status
Separted, divorced, widowed (SDW)
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Relationship status
SDW and Casually Dating
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Full time
|
76 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Part time
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Student
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Retired or on Disability
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Not Employed
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
working and student
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
Some high school
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
High school diploma or equivalent
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
Some university or college
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
Trade or technical school diploma
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Highest level of education
University degree
|
45 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
<$20K
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
$20 - $39,999
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
$40 - $59,999
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
$60 - $79,999
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
$80 - $99,999
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Annual Income
>$100K
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tested for HIV previously
Tested previously
|
86 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tested for HIV previously
Not tested previously
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tested for HIV previously
Unsure
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Tested for HIV previously
Other
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site
|
123 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Reactive Test Results
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on averageThis was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process
|
30.4 Minutes
Standard Deviation 6.95
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on averagePopulation: Percentage continuous response scale (0-100)
Once the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy \& whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy. Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an "x" on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question "How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?", the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an "x" at the 50% notch on the line. Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement. Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Importance of finger prick blood sample
|
80.35 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Comfort with testing at pharmacy
|
88.66 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Confidence PhC did a good job administering test
|
96.93 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Likelihood to get tested for other STBBI
|
83.14 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Importance of privacy at pharmacy site
|
89.42 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Importance of immediate test results
|
94.87 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Importance of private room for testing and consult
|
94.87 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Importance of free testing
|
88.78 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Imporatance of not needing an appointment
|
91.22 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Willingness to pay for testing
|
78.69 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Should HIV testing be offered at pharmacies
|
99.2 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on averagePopulation: Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.
Prior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history. Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening. Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Participants
n=123 Participants
Patients requesting a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy study site.
|
|---|---|
|
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Previously exchanged sex for money or drugs
|
8 Participants
|
|
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Prior blood transfusion
|
2 Participants
|
|
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Men who have sex with men
|
56 Participants
|
|
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
History of IV drug use
|
6 Participants
|
|
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Denver HIV risk score >/= 30
|
89 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Study Participants
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Debbie Kelly
School of Pharmacy, Memorial University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place