House Dust Mite Injection Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients.

NCT ID: NCT03209245

Last Updated: 2017-07-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-10

Study Completion Date

2017-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background. Immunotherapy in elderly patients is controversial, and there is still not much evidences supporting this treatment's safety and efficacy in this population. This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of specific injection immunotherapy for house dust mite allergens in patients over 65 years of age with allergic rhinitis and a confirmed allergy to house dust mites. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the mean average adjusted symptom score (AAdSS) and the total combined rhinitis score (TCRS) difference in the least square means in the label in comparison to placebo.

Materials and methods. The study with double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted in one centre. Fifty eight elderly patients with house dust mites allergy and AR were individually randomized in comparable numbers to one of two parallel groups: two years perennial AIT with the use Purethal Mites or placebo. Symptoms and medication score were presented as AAdSS and TCRS. Quality of life based on Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), serum allergen specific IgG4 to D.pteronyssinus and D. farinae and Der p1 and Der p2 were monitoring.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of injection AIT for HDM allergens in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis and a confirmed HDM allergy. The study with double blind, placebo controlled trial was conducted in one centre. A total of 92 patients ranging from 65 to 73 years of age were recruited from the outpatient allergy clinic to assess their eligibility for inclusion in the study. First, there was a need for pre screening approximately 157 patients with inhalant allergies and the right age. Additionally, the patients included in the study all had a positive skin prick test (SPT), were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), and had positive nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with D.pteronyssinus and D. farinae allergens. Patients with a clinical allergy and/or a positive skin prick test and specific IgE to other inhalant allergens (including other pollens) were excluded from the study. A careful examination of the eyes, ears, nose, and throat was performed on all patients. The severity of perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) was assessed using the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines. The patients were randomly selected to receive PURETHAL Mites (20,000 AUeq/ml, HAL Allergy BV, Leiden, The Netherlands, containing major allergen equivalents of 14.0 μg/ml group 1, and 20.0 μg/ml group 2, measured by ELISA in the extract prior to modification and adsorption on aluminium hydroxide) or a placebo (Figure 1). The recruitment period was limited to three months (April-June). Purethal Mites were administered as perennial therapy using the following regimen: 1 dose- 0.1 ml, 2 doses - 0.2 ml, 3 doses - 0.5 ml every week, and 0.5 ml every four weeks during 24 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergen Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Treatment of AIT- active group
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators
Treatment with placebo - placebo groub

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active AIT group

Injection immunotherapy with Purethal Mites were administered as perennial therapy using the following regimen of injections: 1 dose- 0.1 ml, 2 doses - 0.2 ml, 3 doses - 0.5 ml every week, and 0.5 ml every four weeks during 24 months.

monitoring of allergen specific IgE monitoring of allergen specific IgG4

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Purethal Mites

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

perennial allergren specific immunotherapy during 24 months

monitoring of allergen specific IgE

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

measurement the serum specific IgE at the start and at the end of trial

monitoring of allergen specific IgG4

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

measurement the serum specific IgG4 at the start and at the end of trial

non-active, placebo treatment

symptomatic treatment with concomitant use of placebo injection monitoring of allergen specific IgE monitoring of allergen specific IgG4

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

placebo injection

Intervention Type OTHER

perrenial injection wich were administered in same protocol as Purethal

monitoring of allergen specific IgE

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

measurement the serum specific IgE at the start and at the end of trial

monitoring of allergen specific IgG4

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

measurement the serum specific IgG4 at the start and at the end of trial

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Purethal Mites

perennial allergren specific immunotherapy during 24 months

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

placebo injection

perrenial injection wich were administered in same protocol as Purethal

Intervention Type OTHER

monitoring of allergen specific IgE

measurement the serum specific IgE at the start and at the end of trial

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

monitoring of allergen specific IgG4

measurement the serum specific IgG4 at the start and at the end of trial

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The subjects had moderate or severe intermittent allergic rhinitis and fulfilled the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) criterion
* the patients included in the study all had a positive skin prick test (SPT), were positive for specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE), and had positive nasal provocation tests (NPTs) with D.pteronyssinus and D. farinae allergens.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a clinical allergy and/or a positive skin prick test and specific IgE to other inhalant allergens were excluded from the study. Additionally, patients with any of the following characteristics were also excluded: diagnosis of bronchial asthma, non-allergic rhinitis and severe non-stable diseases. Patients with other nasal problems, such as chronic nasal obstruction, reduced olfaction, bacterial colonization, and chronic sinusitis, were diagnosed based on a CT scan and nasal endoscopy were excluded. Subjects with other chronic or acute clinical disorders or with a history of respiratory tract infections within four weeks of the study initiation were also excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medical University of Silesia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Andrzej Bozek

Clinical Professor Andrzej Bozek, MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bozek A, Kolodziejczyk K, Kozlowska R, Canonica GW. Evidence of the efficacy and safety of house dust mite subcutaneous immunotherapy in elderly allergic rhinitis patients: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Clin Transl Allergy. 2017 Dec 1;7:43. doi: 10.1186/s13601-017-0180-9. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29214012 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HAB605060182

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.