Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Toric Contact Lenses (NCT NCT03208088)

NCT ID: NCT03208088

Last Updated: 2020-09-10

Results Overview

Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

96 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

15 minutes

Results posted on

2020-09-10

Participant Flow

A total of 96 subjects were enrolled in this study, of which 91 subjects were assigned at least 1 study lens, 5 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of the total assigned subjects, 88 completed the study, while 3 were discontinued.

Subjects were randomized to 1 of 10 unique lens sequences.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Test 3/Test 2/Test 4/Test 1/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Control in period 5.
Test 3/Test 4/Test 2/Control/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
Test 1/Control/Test 2/Test 4/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
Test 1/Test 2/Control/Test 3/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
Control/Test 1/Test 4/Test 2/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
Control/Test 4/Test 1/Test 3/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
Test 2/Test 3/Test 1/Test 4 /Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Control in period 5.
Test 2/Test 1/Test 3/Control/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
Test 4/Test 3/Control/Test 2/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
Test 4/Control/Test 3/Test 1/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
Period 1
STARTED
10
9
10
9
9
9
8
10
8
9
Period 1
COMPLETED
10
9
10
9
9
9
8
10
8
9
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period 2
STARTED
10
9
10
9
9
9
8
10
8
9
Period 2
COMPLETED
10
9
10
9
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Period 3
STARTED
10
9
10
9
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 3
COMPLETED
10
9
10
8
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 3
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period 4
STARTED
10
9
10
8
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 4
COMPLETED
10
9
10
7
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 4
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period 5
STARTED
10
9
10
7
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 5
COMPLETED
10
9
10
7
9
9
8
10
7
9
Period 5
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Test 3/Test 2/Test 4/Test 1/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Control in period 5.
Test 3/Test 4/Test 2/Control/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
Test 1/Control/Test 2/Test 4/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
Test 1/Test 2/Control/Test 3/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
Control/Test 1/Test 4/Test 2/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
Control/Test 4/Test 1/Test 3/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
Test 2/Test 3/Test 1/Test 4 /Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Control in period 5.
Test 2/Test 1/Test 3/Control/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
Test 4/Test 3/Control/Test 2/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
Test 4/Control/Test 3/Test 1/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
Period 2
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Period 3
Unsatisfactory Test Article
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Period 4
Unsatisfactory Test Article
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Toric Contact Lenses

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Completed Subjects
n=88 Participants
All subjects who were administered study article and completed all required study visits.
Age, Continuous
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.59 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
88 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 15 minutes

Population: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.

Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test 1
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 1 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Test 2
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 2 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Control
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Overall Handling Comparison Between Test 1/Test 2 and Control
57.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.34
53.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.47
52.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 15 minutes

Population: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.

Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Test 1
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 1 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Test 2
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 2 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Control
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
Overall Handling Comparison Between Test 3/Test 4 and Control
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.59
49.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.83
52.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88

Adverse Events

Test 1

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test 2

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test 3

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Test 4

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Thomas Karkkainen SR Principal Research Optometrist

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-843-2020

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60