Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Toric Contact Lenses (NCT NCT03208088)
NCT ID: NCT03208088
Last Updated: 2020-09-10
Results Overview
Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
COMPLETED
NA
96 participants
15 minutes
2020-09-10
Participant Flow
A total of 96 subjects were enrolled in this study, of which 91 subjects were assigned at least 1 study lens, 5 subjects failed to meet all eligibility criteria. Of the total assigned subjects, 88 completed the study, while 3 were discontinued.
Subjects were randomized to 1 of 10 unique lens sequences.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Test 3/Test 2/Test 4/Test 1/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Control in period 5.
|
Test 3/Test 4/Test 2/Control/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
|
Test 1/Control/Test 2/Test 4/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
|
Test 1/Test 2/Control/Test 3/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
|
Control/Test 1/Test 4/Test 2/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
|
Control/Test 4/Test 1/Test 3/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
|
Test 2/Test 3/Test 1/Test 4 /Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Control in period 5.
|
Test 2/Test 1/Test 3/Control/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
|
Test 4/Test 3/Control/Test 2/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
|
Test 4/Control/Test 3/Test 1/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 1
STARTED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
9
|
|
Period 1
COMPLETED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
9
|
|
Period 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 2
STARTED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
8
|
9
|
|
Period 2
COMPLETED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Period 3
STARTED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
9
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 3
COMPLETED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
8
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 3
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 4
STARTED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
8
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 4
COMPLETED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 4
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 5
STARTED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 5
COMPLETED
|
10
|
9
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
9
|
8
|
10
|
7
|
9
|
|
Period 5
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Test 3/Test 2/Test 4/Test 1/Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Control in period 5.
|
Test 3/Test 4/Test 2/Control/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 3 in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
|
Test 1/Control/Test 2/Test 4/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 2 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
|
Test 1/Test 2/Control/Test 3/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 1 in period 1, Test 2 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
|
Control/Test 1/Test 4/Test 2/Test 3
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 4 in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 3 in period 5.
|
Control/Test 4/Test 1/Test 3/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Control in period 1, Test 4 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 3 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
|
Test 2/Test 3/Test 1/Test 4 /Control
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Test 1 in period 3, Test 4 in period 4, Control in period 5.
|
Test 2/Test 1/Test 3/Control/Test 4
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 2 in period 1, Test 1 in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Control in period 4, Test 4 in period 5.
|
Test 4/Test 3/Control/Test 2/Test 1
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Test 3 in period 2, Control in period 3, Test 2 in period 4, Test 1 in period 5.
|
Test 4/Control/Test 3/Test 1/Test 2
Subjects randomized to this sequence received the following treatments in order: Test 4 in period 1, Control in period 2, Test 3 in period 3, Test 1 in period 4, Test 2 in period 5.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Period 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Period 3
Unsatisfactory Test Article
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Period 4
Unsatisfactory Test Article
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Toric Contact Lenses
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Completed Subjects
n=88 Participants
All subjects who were administered study article and completed all required study visits.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
51.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.59 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
73 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
88 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 15 minutesPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test 1
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 1 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
Test 2
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 2 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
Control
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Handling Comparison Between Test 1/Test 2 and Control
|
57.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.34
|
53.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.47
|
52.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 15 minutesPopulation: All subjects who had successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol.
Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Test 1
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 1 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
Test 2
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Test 2 lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
Control
n=67 Participants
Subjects that wore the Control lens in either the first, second, third, fourth, or fifth period of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Handling Comparison Between Test 3/Test 4 and Control
|
50.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.59
|
49.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.83
|
52.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.88
|
Adverse Events
Test 1
Test 2
Test 3
Test 4
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Thomas Karkkainen SR Principal Research Optometrist
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60