Efficacy of OSTENIL PLUS (Hyaluronic Acid) Versus SYNVISC-ONE in Patients With Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT03203408

Last Updated: 2017-10-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

290 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-06-21

Study Completion Date

2012-11-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS compared to that of a single intra-articular injection of the reference product SYNVISC-ONE in the treatment of symptomatic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis. The primary endpoint was the change in mean score on the WOMAC pain scales from D0 to D180.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After a period of washout-out for NSAIDs, the patients received a single intra-articular injection of OSTENIL PLUS or of SYNVISC-ONE in the most painful knee. The study involved a preselection visit at D-7 and five further visits: at D0 (baseline, evaluation before intra-articular injection), at D2 ± 2 days (injection), at D30 ± 15 days, at D90 ± 15 days and C5 at D180 ± 15 days.

To enrol the patients as quickly as possible, 129 sites, i.e. general medical or rheumatology practices, were open. After verifying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the evaluating investigators assigned a randomisation number based on the chronological order of inclusion of patients at their site. The patient was then sent to the injecting investigator so that he/she could give the injection of the product corresponding to the randomisation number.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study was a multicentre, prospective, double-blind, randomised, controlled non-inferiority study in two parallel groups of patients followed up for six months.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
To prevent the patients from knowing the nature of their treatment, the investigational products OSTENIL PLUS and SYNVISC-ONE were packed in identical neutral packs. OSTENIL PLUS and SYNVISC-ONE differ in appearance (product volume and viscosity, prefilled syringe) and were therefore readily identifiable by the investigator administering the investigational product (i.e. injecting investigator). The double-blind masking could be ensured thanks to the intervention of an observer who did not know the nature of the treatment, namely the evaluating investigator. The treatment was therefore administered blind to the evaluating investigator and the patient but not to the injecting investigator.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OSTENIL PLUS

A single intra-articular injection of sodium hyaluronate 40 mg/2.0 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OSTENIL PLUS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

SYNVISC-ONE

A single intra-articular injection of hylan G-F 20 48 mg/6 ml at Day 2, i.e. 2 days post Baseline (Day 0 = Week 0)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SYNVISC-ONE

Intervention Type DEVICE

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OSTENIL PLUS

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

Intervention Type DEVICE

SYNVISC-ONE

Injection into the joint cavity of the most painful knee

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female aged 40-85 years;
* Primary knee osteoarthritis complying with the American College or Rheumatology criteria;
* Radiographically defined osteoarthritis: joint space narrowing and osteophyte in X-ray taken less than one year previously and modified Kellgren-Lawrence grade Ib-III;
* Symptoms on one side only, with a mean WOMAC A of ≥40 mm. If knee osteoarthritis is bilateral, a difference for that score between the contralateral knee and the selected knee should be of at least 20 mm;
* Pain present on at least 15 days in the month before inclusion;
* Failure or intolerance of first line analgesics and NSAIDs;
* With health insurance;
* Understanding and following the study instructions;
* Signed the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Knee osteoarthritis that is not symptomatic or insufficiently symptomatic;
* Bilateral symptomatic knee osteoarthritis of the same severity on both sides;
* Post-traumatic secondary knee osteoarthritis;
* Knee osteoarthritis of radiographic grade I, Ia or IV;
* Exclusively patellofemoral osteoarthritis where the symptoms are principally of patellofemoral origin (Patellar syndrome);
* Symptomatic homolateral coxarthrosis;
* Varus or valgus deformation of the selected knee (deformation axis ≥15° in X-ray);
* Inflammatory rheumatism (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic rheumatism, articular chondrocalcinosis, gout, Paget's disease, ankylosing spondylitis, lupus, etc.);
* History of injury to the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
* Venous or lymphatic stenosis of the lower limb;
* Femoral or sciatic nerve root pain of the lower limb to be tested;
* Tendinopathy (e.g. hip periarthritis);
* Treatment with intra-articular hyaluronic acid in the selected knee during the 6 months before inclusion;
* Intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the selected knee during the 2 months before inclusion;
* Treatment with symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis and/or dietary supplements for osteoarthritis (chondroitin sulphate, diacerein, avocado and soybean unsaponifiables, oxaceprol, copper granions, glucosamine) which had been started less than 3 months previously or whose dose had been changed during the last 3 months before inclusion;
* Total knee replacement of the selected knee;
* Surgery of the other knee or of the hip or any other surgery scheduled during the period of the study;
* History of any surgical intervention, arthroscopy, osteotomy, etc. in the year before inclusion;
* Obesity: body mass index ≥30 kg/m2;
* History of autoimmune disease;
* Severe condition likely to interfere with the evaluation, such as neoplasia, malignant blood disease, kidney disease, liver disease or severe infection;
* Very marked hydrarthrosis (requiring puncture) at the time of inclusion;
* Wound or skin condition of the selected knee;
* Anticoagulant treatment with heparin or warfarin (platelet antiaggregants such as ASPIRIN ≤325 mg/d, ticlopidine or clopidogrel were allowed);
* Known hypersensitivity to hyaluronic acid and/or to avian proteins and/or paracetamol;
* Known hypersensitivity to mannitol;
* Participation in a clinical research study within the previous 3 months;
* Pregnancy, breast-feeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

TRB Chemedica

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Renée Liliane Dreiser, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

APHP Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France

Bernard Avouac, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

APHP Henri Mondor, Creteil, France

Thomas Bardin, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

APHP Lariboisière, Paris, France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-A00258-33

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

OSTP-EUR-10-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id