Comparison of Karyotyping, CMA and NIPT for Prenatal Diagnosing Chromosomal Anomalies
NCT ID: NCT03201666
Last Updated: 2017-06-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-07-01
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Design: diagnostic test Set: Prenatal diagnosis center of Taizhou City Study population: The Pregnant women who needed amniocenteses for prenatal genetic diagnosis were recruited.
Methods: amniotic fluid was regular examined by Karyotyping and CMA, and maternal peripheral blood was used for collected for NIPT detecting.
Statistic: CMA result as a golden standard, the main outcome is compared the diagnostic efficacy of NIPT for diagnosing chromosomal anomalies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. only singleton were included
Exclusion Criteria
2. Women who unfitted for NIPT analysis include multiple, history of allogeneic blood cell transfusion.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
YiYang Zhu
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
YiYang Zhu
Director,Clinical dean of Prenatal Diagnosis Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
YiYang Zhu, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
prenatal doagnosis center of taizhou city
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang province
Taizhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
YiYang Zhu, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TZ201607
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id