Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-24
2024-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD (Disrupt PAD III)
NCT02923193
A Clinical Evaluation of the MicroSTent® PeripherAl Vascular SteNt in Subjects With Arterial Disease Below the Knee (STAND)
NCT03477604
Study of SilverHawk®/TurboHawk® in Lower Extremity Vessels (DEFINITIVE™ LE)
NCT00883246
Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Peripheral Artery Disease.
NCT05757258
Zilver® Flex™ Vascular Stent Study
NCT00827619
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary treatment goals for PAD are symptom relief, quality of life improvement, and cardiovascular risk reduction. Several treatment options are available for PAD, ranging from invasive revascularization procedures, including peripheral percutaneous intervention (PPI) and surgical revascularization to non-invasive options, including supervised and home-based exercise therapy, PAD-specific medications, and cardiovascular risk management. While there is no "gold-standard" treatment for PAD, less invasive options are recommended as a first-choice treatment. Despite these recommendations, invasive procedures are often first offered to patients, with no alternative options being discussed. In treatment scenarios with a lot of clinical equipoise (i.e. uncertainty about what treatment would be best) and a rapidly growing market for newly-introduced technologies, including medical devices for invasive PAD procedures (e.g. stents for endovascular treatment), with limited performance measurement and accountability criteria, there is a high risk of unwanted variation in treatment practices, misallocation of treatments, and unnecessary costs.
Given this context, some of the current challenges in current PAD care include: 1) limited access to the evidence-base in routine clinical care for patients and providers; 2) the potential mismatch of PAD treatments to patient preferences and profiles; and 3) patients not being informed or engaged in medical decision making. These challenges may leave patients uninformed about treatment risks and benefits, increase the risk of misallocating treatments to patients, and may unnecessarily increase costs. A very promising strategy to overcome these challenges is the use of evidence-based, decision support tools. Importantly, it is currently unknown whether patient-centered PAD decision-tools can be designed to improve the alignment of patients' values with respect to their treatment choice and whether these tools can improve patients' knowledge and access to the evidence-base related to PAD treatment and outcomes. The critical next step, therefore, is to create such tools and pilot their implementation as a foundation for broader integration of precision medicine and shared decision-making in clinical care.
Shared decision-making takes into account the latest evidence about all available treatment options and their outcomes, as well as patients' values and preferences with regards to treatment and potential outcomes that matter to them. Shared decision-making is extremely useful in treatment situations where there is clinical equipoise and where the choice of treatment should be greatly influenced by patients' preferences. Decision aids that facilitate this process of shared decision-making, have been consistently associated with better knowledge about the disease and treatments, less decisional conflict, and potential cost savings due to less invasive options being preferred by patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Received Decision Tool
Peripheral artery disease patients that received the decision support tool.
Decision Support Tool
Patients enrolled in the study will receive the decision tool prior to the first PAD clinic visit and the medical decision making conversation with the provider.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decision Support Tool
Patients enrolled in the study will receive the decision tool prior to the first PAD clinic visit and the medical decision making conversation with the provider.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age ≥18 years
* New onset complaints of PAD symptoms or exacerbation of previous PAD symptoms
* The diagnostic enrollment criterion includes a positive result for one of the following
* Doppler resting ankle-brachial index (ABI)≤0.90 or a significant drop in post exercise ankle pressure of ≥20 mmHg.
* Duplex
* CTA
* MRA
* TCOM
* Angiogram
Exclusion Criteria
* A lower limb revascularization procedure in the ipsilateral leg (same leg) where the patient is currently having symptoms in the past year (atherectomy, endarterectomy, bypass surgery, angioplasty)
* Peripheral intervention that occurs before the baseline interview
* Current episode of critical limb ischemia (ischemic rest pain, ulceration or gangrene) (Fontaine III, IV or Rutherford IV-VI)
* Patients with dementia
* Patients who are prisoners
* Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
* Non-English speaking patients
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
Saint Luke's Health System
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kim G Smolderen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Missouri Kansas City; Saint Luke's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995 Jan-Mar;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105.
de Graaff JC, Ubbink DT, Kools EI, Chamuleau SA, Jacobs MJ. The impact of peripheral and coronary artery disease on health-related quality of life. Ann Vasc Surg. 2002 Jul;16(4):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s10016-001-0121-9. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
Rooke TW, Hirsch AT, Misra S, Sidawy AN, Beckman JA, Findeiss LK, Golzarian J, Gornik HL, Halperin JL, Jaff MR, Moneta GL, Olin JW, Stanley JC, White CJ, White JV, Zierler RE; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (updating the 2005 guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 1;58(19):2020-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.023. Epub 2011 Oct 6. No abstract available.
Smolderen KG, Pacheco C, Provance J, Stone N, Fuss C, Decker C, Bunte M, Jelani QU, Safley DM, Secemsky E, Sepucha KR, Spatz ES, Mena-Hurtado C, Spertus JA. Treatment decisions for patients with peripheral artery disease and symptoms of claudication: Development process and alpha testing of the SHOW-ME PAD decision aid. Vasc Med. 2021 Jun;26(3):273-280. doi: 10.1177/1358863X20988780. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-053
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.