Trial Outcomes & Findings for Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Synvisc-One® in Chinese Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee (NCT NCT03190369)
NCT ID: NCT03190369
Last Updated: 2022-03-25
Results Overview
The WOMAC Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) version 3.1 questionnaire was a self-administered, health status measure questionnaire of 24 questions comprising 3 subscales (joint pain, stiffness and physical function) for participants with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. WOMAC A1 pain subscale (measure of pain during walking on a flat surface) was measured on 11-point (NRS) ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
440 participants
From Baseline up to Week 26
2022-03-25
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 21 sites in China from 21 August 2017 to 28 January 2019. A total of 524 participants were screened, of which, 84 participants were screen failures. Screen failures were mainly due to inclusion criteria not met.
A total of 440 participants were enrolled and randomized in the study. Assignment to arms was done centrally using an interactive voice response system/interactive web response system (IVRS/IWRS) in 1:1 ratio (Placebo: Hylan G-F 20).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received a single intra-articular (IA) injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
220
|
220
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
220
|
218
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
219
|
212
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
Participants received a single intra-articular (IA) injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Poor compliance to protocol
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdraw before treatment
|
1
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Randomized Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Synvisc-One® in Chinese Patients With Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Total
n=440 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 • n=5 Participants
|
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=7 Participants
|
61.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
172 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
170 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
342 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
98 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
220 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
220 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
440 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on modified Intent-To-Treat (mITT) population which included all randomized and treated participants. Participants were analyzed in the treatment group to which they were randomized.
The WOMAC Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) version 3.1 questionnaire was a self-administered, health status measure questionnaire of 24 questions comprising 3 subscales (joint pain, stiffness and physical function) for participants with Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. WOMAC A1 pain subscale (measure of pain during walking on a flat surface) was measured on 11-point (NRS) ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) A1 Pain (Walking Pain) Subscale Score Over 26 Weeks
|
-2.271 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.110
|
-2.146 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.108
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.
The WOMAC NRS version 3.1 questionnaire was a self-administered, health status measure questionnaire of 24 questions comprising 3 subscales (joint pain, stiffness and physical function) for participants with OA of the knee. WOMAC A1 pain subscale (measure of pain during walking on a flat surface) was measured on 11-point (NRS) ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain. For 7-day average WOMAC A1, the baseline value was defined as the average of the WOMAC A1 scores recorded 7 days prior to the first investigational medicinal product (IMP) administration (WOMAC A1 score recorded on Day 1 included). The 7-day average WOMAC A1 was set as missing if 3 or more of the 7 WOMAC A1 scores were missing.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in 7-day Average WOMAC A1 Pain (Walking Pain) Subscale Score Over 26 Weeks
|
-2.275 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.108
|
-2.176 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.106
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.
The WOMAC NRS version 3.1 questionnaire was a self-administered, health status measure questionnaire of 24 questions comprising 3 subscales (joint pain, stiffness and physical function) for participants with OA of the knee. WOMAC A (5 items: measure of pain while walking, using stairs, at night while in bed, sitting or lying, and standing); each item was measured on 11-point (NRS) ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain. Total WOMAC A score was the sum of 5 item scores and ranges from 0 (none) to 50 (extreme); where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in WOMAC A Score Over 26 Weeks
|
-8.747 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.491
|
-8.621 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.486
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.
PTGA (self-assessment of target knee OA condition) was measured using an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (best possible) to 10 (worst possible), where lower score represented best possible condition and higher score represented worst possible condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Self-Assessment (PTGA) Score of Osteoarthritis Over 26 Weeks
|
-2.138 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.104
|
-2.144 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.102
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.
COGA was used by the physicians to perform a global assessment of the participant's target knee OA condition. The response was captured using the 11-point NRS pain intensity rating scale ranging from 0 (best possible) to 10 (worst possible) at the specified time points, where lower score represented best possible condition and higher score represented worst possible condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Observer Global Assessment (COGA) Score of Osteoarthritis Over 26 Weeks
|
-2.145 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.095
|
-2.225 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.094
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 20 and Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on mITT population.
WOMAC A1 responder were defined as \>=2-point improvement from baseline in the WOMAC A1 NRS. The WOMAC NRS version 3.1 questionnaire was a self-administered, health status measure questionnaire of 24 questions comprising 3 subscales (joint pain, stiffness and physical function) for participants with OA of the knee. WOMAC A1 pain subscale (measure of pain during walking on a flat surface) was measured on 11-point (NRS) ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extreme), where lower score represented no pain and higher score represented extreme pain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 4
|
58.6 percentage of participants
|
53.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 8
|
65.0 percentage of participants
|
62.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 12
|
66.4 percentage of participants
|
62.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 16
|
69.1 percentage of participants
|
63.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 20
|
65.0 percentage of participants
|
66.5 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Positive WOMAC A1 Responder Over 26 Weeks
Week 26
|
68.2 percentage of participants
|
67.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline up to Week 26Population: Analysis was performed on safety population which included randomized participants who received at least 1 injection or part of an injection of Hylan G-F 20 or placebo.
Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug and did not necessarily had a causal relationship with the treatment. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened (according to the Investigator opinion), or became serious during the on-treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 Participants
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
142 Participants
|
134 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Hylan G-F 20
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 participants at risk
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 participants at risk
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis B
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.91%
2/220 • Number of events 2 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.92%
2/218 • Number of events 2 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon Cancer
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Ovarian Fibroma
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal Cancer
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral Infarction
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lacunar Infarction
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis Coronary Artery
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.92%
2/218 • Number of events 2 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Adhesions
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral Disc Protrusion
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal Osteoarthritis
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine Polyp
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint Injury
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
0.00%
0/220 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.46%
1/218 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius Fracture
|
0.45%
1/220 • Number of events 1 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
0.00%
0/218 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=220 participants at risk
Participants received a single IA injection of phosphate buffered saline on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
Hylan G-F 20
n=218 participants at risk
Participants received a single IA injection of 6 mL Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One) on Day 1 and were observed for 26 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
5.5%
12/220 • Number of events 18 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
6.0%
13/218 • Number of events 14 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
13.6%
30/220 • Number of events 40 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
12.8%
28/218 • Number of events 31 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
3.6%
8/220 • Number of events 9 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
5.0%
11/218 • Number of events 16 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
10.9%
24/220 • Number of events 29 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
11.9%
26/218 • Number of events 35 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
|
1.8%
4/220 • Number of events 5 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
7.3%
16/218 • Number of events 18 • AE data was collected from the time of the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit.
Reported AEs are TEAEs that developed, worsened, or became serious during the treatment period (time from the injection of IMP up to Week 26 follow-up visit). Analysis was performed on safety population.
|
Additional Information
Trial Transparency Team
Sanofi aventis recherche & développement
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Sponsor supports publication of clinical trial results but may request that investigators temporarily delay or alter publications in order to protect proprietary information. The Sponsor may also require that the results of multicenter studies be published only in their entirety and not as individual site data.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER